HMX Game1989 vs. HMX Perky

Overview

When it comes to enhancing your typing and gaming experience, selecting the right mechanical keyboard switch can make all the difference, and the HMX 1989 and HMX Perky are two compelling linear options to consider. The HMX 1989, renowned for its deep thocky sound and feel, provides a satisfying auditory experience that gamers and typists alike may find appealing, especially for those who appreciate a more robust keypress. On the other hand, the HMX Perky boasts a softer, glittery nylon housing, offering a neutral yet deeply satisfying typing experience, particularly thanks to its shorter travel distance that promotes a more condensed and responsive feel. While the 1989 might cater to those who revel in tactile feedback and pronounced sounds, the Perky could be the choice for users seeking a sleek, polished, and silky typing sensation. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX Game1989 Linear

HMX Perky Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX 1989 and the HMX Perky, a notable distinction arises in the choice of materials for the top housing. The HMX 1989 utilizes polycarbonate for its top housing, which is known for its stiffness and translucency. This results in a sharper and crisper sound profile that enhances the clarity and resonance of typing. In contrast, the HMX Perky employs nylon for its top housing, a material characterized by its softer properties that contribute to a deeper and fuller sound. This choice of housing material plays a significant role in how each switch performs acoustically, leading to a fundamentally different sound experience when typing on each switch.

Both the HMX 1989 and HMX Perky feature nylon as the material for their bottom housings, which harmonizes the acoustic profiles to some degree. The nylon bottom housing in both switches promotes a duller and rounder sound, making their typing experiences more similar at the bottom-out point. Since the bottom housing significantly affects the overall sound and feel of a key press, users would find a shared acoustic quality when bottoming out on either switch. Thus, while the top housing contributes distinct characteristics to the sound profile, the similarity in the bottom housing helps maintain a level of consistency in the auditory experience.

Ultimately, the differences between the HMX 1989 and HMX Perky lie in their top housing materials; however, the shared nylon bottom housing establishes a crucial link in the tactile experience of both switches. Typing on the HMX 1989’s polycarbonate top will result in a bright, resonant sound when key releases occur, whereas the HMX Perky will offer a more muted sound profile with its nylon top. Nevertheless, the combination of the nylon bottom in both switches ensures that users can achieve satisfying results regardless of the chosen model, as the grounding effects of nylon help unify the typing experience while accentuating the unique qualities of the individual top housings.

Weight

When comparing the HMX 1989 linear switch with the HMX Perky linear switch, notable distinctions arise in both actuation force and bottom out force. The 1989 switch features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, classifying it as medium-light. In contrast, the Perky switch is lighter, with an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, categorizing it as light. This diminutive force in the Perky switch may make it more appealing for tasks that require extended typing sessions, offering less strain on the fingers. On the other hand, the 1989 switch provides a slightly more substantial feel due to its higher forces, which might cater to users who prefer a firmer typing experience. Overall, users seeking a lighter feel would gravitate toward the Perky switch, while those who appreciate a stronger push should consider the 1989 switch.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Perky linear switch, it is clear that the 1989 offers a longer travel distance of 4 mm, while the Perky measures 3.4 mm. This difference positions the Perky as the shorter option, catering to those who prefer a quicker response time, which is favored by many gamers today. In contrast, the 1989 provides a more traditional travel experience that some users may find more satisfying due to its deeper feel. Ultimately, while both switches aim to provide a reliable pressing experience, the choice between them hinges on personal preference—whether one leans towards the swift feedback of shorter distances or the substantial depth associated with longer distances.

Price comparison

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the HMX 1989 switch is known as the deepest and thockiest of its series, indicating a rich, resonant sound profile that many typists find satisfying. It likely delivers a sound that is much less pronounced compared to the HMX Perky switch, which is characterized by its clacky nature. The Perky produces a crisp, bright, and percussive noise that many gamers and typists love for its sharp response. Overall, if you lean towards a deeper, more muted acoustic sensation, the 1989 may be your preference, while the Perky offers a more vibrant, pronounced auditory feedback.

In terms of feel, the HMX 1989 switch likely provides a heftier and more substantial tactile experience, aligning with its thocky sound signature. This heavier feedback can enhance the typing experience for those who enjoy a pronounced actuation. The HMX Perky switches, by contrast, shine with their polished and silky feel, enabling a remarkably smooth typing experience. The combination of materials and potential factory lubrication contributes to a refined, frictionless interaction with the keys. If you appreciate short travel distances and a smooth experience, the Perky will cater to that desire while the 1989 may feel more robust and deliberate in its actuation.

In summary, both switches offer unique qualities tailored to different preferences in sound and feel. The HMX 1989 excels with its deeper, richer sound and likely heftier feel, making it suitable for those who enjoy a more substantial typing experience. On the other hand, the HMX Perky is geared towards users who favor a lighter, brighter auditory experience along with a polished and silky feel. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you resonate more with a deep thocky typing experience or prefer a clacky, smooth interaction with shorter travel distances.

Conclusion

To conclude, your choice between the HMX 1989 linear switch and the HMX Perky linear switch ultimately hinges on your specific typing preferences and usage scenarios. If you prefer a slightly heavier feel and enjoy a thockier sound that adds depth to your keystrokes, the 1989 is your best option. It's particularly well-suited for gaming, where responsiveness and feedback can enhance your overall performance. On the other hand, if you seek a light and refined typing experience with a more condensed travel distance, the Perky is a fantastic choice. Its polished and silky feel, coupled with the clacky sound profile, makes it ideal for extended typing sessions where comfort and a cheerful auditory feedback enhance your productivity. Essentially, choose the 1989 for a more substantial, immersive feel, while the Perky will serve you well if you prioritize a smoother and more nimble typing experience.

Mentioned in this article

HMX Game1989 Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more

HMX Perky Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn more