Huano Acacia vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the Huano Acacia and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the choice of switch can greatly influence your typing experience, and two popular linear options are the Huano Acacia and the Jerrzi Lotus V2. The Huano Acacia stands out for its medium-light weight and generous factory lubrication, which contribute to a smooth and satisfying feel right from the get-go. Its minimal stem wobble further enhances the typing experience, making it an appealing choice for both gamers and typists looking for responsiveness and comfort. In contrast, while specific details about the Jerrzi Lotus V2's notable features are less pronounced, its linear design is still crafted with a focus on delivering a consistent keystroke. Many users may be drawn to it for its straightforward functionality and potential versatility across various applications. Ultimately, each switch has its own strengths that cater to different preferences and needs; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the perfect switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Huano Acacia and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, it becomes clear that the two switches approach sound profiles differently despite the presence of some commonalities. The Acacia employs a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for producing a sharper and more resonant sound profile due to its stiffness. This characteristic allows the switch to create a crisper auditory experience, particularly when RGB lighting is incorporated, as the translucency of polycarbonate enhances the visual appeal. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 utilizes a POM top housing, which offers a contrasting sound profile. The POM material creates a deeper, more muted sound, providing a unique auditory experience that differs from the bright, crisp notes produced by the Acacia. Thus, while both switches aim to deliver compelling sound profiles, the materials used in the top housing set them apart significantly.
In terms of bottom housing, the Acacia features a nylon material, which is typically known for generating a deeper and fuller sound experience. The softness of nylon allows it to absorb sound effectively, resulting in a duller and rounder audio output. Conversely, the Lotus V2 also opts for a POM bottom housing, which delivers a similar deeper and muted sound profile as its top counterpart. This creates a more cohesive auditory experience throughout the switch, reinforcing the unique sound character that POM provides. The different combinations of materials highlight how the overall feel and auditory feedback of a switch can be influenced by the chosen housing materials, with POM promoting a more uniform experience while nylon favors a distinct profile for the Acacia.
The influence of top and bottom housing materials cannot be overstated when it comes to creating a compelling switch experience. Even though the Acacia features diverging materials with polycarbonate and nylon, the combination yields an intriguing auditory output where the brightness of the top contrasts with the warmth of the bottom. Meanwhile, the Lotus V2 maintains a harmonious relationship between its top and bottom POM housings, allowing for a consistent, muted sound throughout. This division of sound characteristics underscores the importance of understanding how housing materials interact; a user's experience will depend largely on the interplay between the materials chosen for each component. Ultimately, even as the two switches diverge in their specific material choices, they both succeed in delivering distinct and engaging audio experiences through carefully designed housing configurations.
Weight
When comparing the Huano Acacia linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, both switches exhibit the same actuation force of 45 grams, which makes them feel quite similar in terms of keystroke triggering. This medium-light actuation force is beneficial for users who prefer a lighter typing experience, making it suitable for long typing sessions at work or extended gaming marathons. However, the bottom out forces differ significantly: the Acacia has a bottom out force of 55 grams, while the bottom out force for the Lotus V2 is unknown. This means that while both switches share the same actuation force, the Acacia provides a more definite feedback when bottoming out, potentially offering a more substantial typing experience for users who appreciate that tactile feedback. Consequently, the Acacia is the heavier of the two switches when it comes to the bottom out experience, making it more suitable for those who prefer a firmer feel during intense gaming or heavy typing. Without a specified bottom out force for the Lotus V2, it remains unclear how it compares in that regard.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the Huano Acacia linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, the Acacia has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, whereas the Lotus V2 measures at 3.4 mm. This makes the Acacia the longer switch by 0.1 mm. For gamers seeking faster response times, the shorter travel distance of the Lotus V2 may be more appealing, offering quicker key activation that can enhance gameplay. However, for those who prefer a more pronounced keypress and a sense of depth, the Acacia's longer travel distance may feel more satisfying. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches boils down to personal preference regarding the feel and responsiveness of the keystrokes.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
The Huano Acacia comes in at $3.39 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The Huano Acacia linear switch is known for its relatively quiet operation, which contributes to a smooth and unobtrusive typing experience. The generous factory lubrication helps to dampen any potential sound, allowing it to be particularly pleasant for those who work in shared environments or prefer a more muted click. The sound profile of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, however, is not clearly defined or described, leaving some uncertainty regarding its acoustic characteristics. It's important to remember, though, that the overall sound of either switch can also be influenced by the specific keyboard build, including the materials used in the case and the keycaps selected.
In terms of feel, the Acacia switch shines with its medium-light weight, allowing for effortless actuation with minimal force. This makes for a comfortable and fluid typing experience that can accommodate long typing sessions without causing fatigue. The generous lubrication also enhances its smoothness, reducing any friction during keypresses. Conversely, the feel of the Lotus V2 remains undefined in the information provided, which leaves a gap in understanding how it might compare in terms of actuation force, smoothness, and overall typing comfort.
Overall, the Huano Acacia linear switch stands out due to its well-rounded performance, characterized by a quiet sound profile and a pleasant, smooth feel. The lack of information about the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch in these areas makes it challenging to draw a direct comparison. However, if you're seeking a solid typing experience straight out of the box, the Acacia is a strong contender. Should the Lotus V2 offer similar characteristics to the Acacia in terms of smoothness and sound dampening, you might enjoy a comparable experience, but without more specific details, it's difficult to make a definitive judgment.
Conclusion
To conclude, choosing between the Huano Acacia linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch largely depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you’re looking for a reliable option with a balanced, medium-light actuation force of 55 grams, the Huano Acacia is an excellent choice. It is designed to deliver a satisfying typing experience right out of the box, thanks to its generous factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble, making it perfect for both gaming and typing tasks. If you appreciate linear switches that require less force to activate and enjoy a smooth feel with little resistance, then the Smooth Acacia is the way to go. On the other hand, if the Jerrzi Lotus V2 becomes available and you find no specific characteristics tied to it yet, it might be worth considering if you prioritize novelty or potential performance enhancements that haven’t been fully explored. Ultimately, your choice will hinge on whether you prefer a proven, well-rounded switch like the Acacia for its comfort and performance or are curious about what the Lotus V2 might offer in the future.
Mentioned in this article
