Huano Acacia vs. KTT MoonRosa
An in-depth look at the Huano Acacia and the KTT MoonRosa switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When selecting the right mechanical keyboard switch, the Huano Acacia and KTT MoonRosa offer distinct experiences that cater to different preferences. The Huano Acacia, a medium-light linear switch, is celebrated for its generous factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble, delivering an excellent typing experience straight out of the box. Its responsive feel makes it a suitable choice for those who desire a balanced tactile sensation without significant resistance. Conversely, the KTT MoonRosa, constructed entirely from POM, boasts a buttery smooth typing experience that is coupled with a neutral sound signature, making it an attractive option for users seeking a quiet yet satisfying keystroke. This switch is characterized as mild, low-pitched, and easy to press, appealing to those who favor effortless actuation. Both switches present unique advantages: the Acacia for its immediate usability and minimal need for post-purchase adjustments, and the MoonRosa for its silky smoothness and subdued auditory feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Spring
22mm spring
Housing materials
The Huano Acacia and the KTT MoonRosa switches both utilize distinct materials in their housings that contribute to their unique sound profiles. The Acacia features a polycarbonate top housing that is recognized for producing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. This characteristic primarily stems from polycarbonate's relatively stiff structure, which enhances sound resonance and clarity. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it an excellent choice for RGB lighting setups, as it allows light to shine through and create visual effects. In contrast, the MoonRosa employs a POM top housing, which delivers a notably deeper and more muted sound profile. POM, while still providing some clarity, tends to favor a more rounded auditory experience compared to polycarbonate.
When examining the bottom housings of both switches, the materials employed continue to demonstrate their contrasting qualities. The Acacia uses nylon for its bottom housing, which is a classic choice known for generating a deeper and fuller sound. This is attributed to nylon's softer nature, which absorbs sound more effectively than harder plastics, leading to a duller and more rounded audio quality. Meanwhile, the MoonRosa opts for a POM bottom housing, which, like its top counterpart, produces a pleasing and unique sound profile that mirrors the deeper and muted characteristics noted in its top housing. Both materials provide a rich sound experience, yet the result is an audible difference in depth and resonance that is shaped by the unique properties of POM and nylon.
Ultimately, the interaction between the housing materials in the Acacia and MoonRosa weaves a complex tapestry of sound. The combination of a polycarbonate top with a nylon bottom in the Acacia gives it a distinct sharpness and fullness that cannot be replicated by the POM used in both of MoonRosa's housings. However, if they were to be arranged differently, with either switch adopting a shared housing material, the acoustical experience would leverage the softer and more muted sound profile of the POM throughout both housing components. This example illustrates how delving into the specific materials used in keyboard switches not only reveals the intricacies of their sound profiles but also how designers can manipulate those characteristics to tailor user experiences according to preference.
Weight
The Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch differ in both actuation force and bottom out force, making them suitable for different typing preferences. The Acacia switch has a higher actuation force of 45 grams compared to the MoonRosa’s lighter actuation force of 37 grams. This means that the Acacia requires more effort to trigger a keystroke, appealing to users who prefer a slightly heavier feel for a substantial typing experience. Additionally, the bottom out force of the Acacia is 55 grams, while the MoonRosa bottoms out at 45 grams, further emphasizing the Acacia's heavier response when pressing keys completely down. Overall, the Huano Acacia is the heavier option, which may be better for users who favor a firmer touch, whereas the KTT MoonRosa is lighter, catering to those who desire a more effortless typing experience, especially during long extended sessions.
Travel distance
Both the Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch feature the same travel distance of 3.5 mm, which means that users can expect a similar feel when pressing down on these keys. With identical travel distances, both switches will respond with a comparable depth and tactile feedback, making them equally suitable for typing and gaming experiences where precision is key. Since both switches have the same measurement, there is no need to choose one over the other based on travel distance alone.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
For 10 switches, the Huano Acacia comes in at $3.39, whereas the KTT MoonRosa comes in at $4.88.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Huano Acacia linear switch is designed to produce a subtle and neutral auditory experience, allowing for a more focused and distraction-free typing environment. Although the specific sound profile is not extensively detailed, it can be inferred that it doesn’t deviate significantly from the typical characteristics of linear switches. On the other hand, the KTT MoonRosa switch boasts a low-pitched sound, which contributes to a mellow, bass-heavy auditory signature that is generally appealing to users who prefer a quieter typing experience. The overall sound output from both switches is influenced by external factors such as the keyboard build and keycap materials, but the MoonRosa's emphasis on a softer tone provides a discernible contrast to the Acacia.
When it comes to feel, the Acacia switch offers a typing experience that is characterized by its medium-light weight and ease of activation. This design minimizes stem wobble while featuring generous factory lubrication, enhancing the smoothness of each key press without requiring excessive force. In comparison, the MoonRosa switch presents a feel that is mild and easy to press, providing gentle resistance during activation. This switch's construction not only supports a comfortable typing experience but also significantly reduces finger fatigue during longer typing sessions. Both switches cater to users who prioritize a smooth, enjoyable typing experience, though the MoonRosa leans towards a more effortless, low-impact feel.
Overall, both the Huano Acacia and KTT MoonRosa linear switches bring distinct advantages to the table, catering to different preferences among keyboard enthusiasts. The Acacia's combination of medium-light weight, smooth operation, and neutral sound may appeal to those who enjoy a balanced typing experience. Conversely, users who favor a low-pitched sound and an easy-to-press feel may find the MoonRosa switch to be the better option. Ultimately, though they share similarities in providing a pleasant and efficient typing experience, the subtle differences in sound and feel make each switch uniquely suited to different typing styles and preferences.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Huano Acacia and KTT MoonRosa linear switches, consider the type of typing experience you prefer. If you lean towards a medium-light typing feel and appreciate a switch that comes pre-lubed for a smooth glide, the Huano Acacia is an excellent choice, particularly for those who enjoy an effortless yet slightly more resistant typing experience. Its moderate bottom-out force of 55 grams is perfect for users looking for a balance between feedback and ease of pressing. On the other hand, if you prioritize a lighter touch, the KTT MoonRosa would serve you well, especially with its remarkably low actuation force of 45 grams. This makes it an ideal option for users prone to finger fatigue or those who simply prefer a more effortless typing experience. Additionally, the MoonRosa's all-POM construction gives it a buttery smooth feel and a gentle sound profile, which might appeal to users seeking a mild and low-pitched auditory experience. Ultimately, your choice should reflect your personal preferences regarding typing resistance, sound, and overall comfort, ensuring you find the switch that best enhances your mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
