Huano Acacia vs. TTC Neptune
An in-depth look at the Huano Acacia and the TTC Neptune switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to selecting the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, two popular linear options are the Huano Acacia and the TTC Neptune, each offering unique characteristics that cater to different typing preferences. The Huano Acacia switch is recognized for its medium-light weight, generous factory lubrication, and minimal stem wobble, resulting in an outstanding typing experience right out of the box. On the other hand, the TTC Neptune features an innovative internal structure that creates a remarkably smooth, almost frictionless glide, complemented by a springy resistance reminiscent of chewy mochi or tapioca pearls, making it particularly enticing for fast typists. Additionally, the Neptune exhibits a muted and thocky sound signature, which can appeal to those looking for a quieter experience. While both switches boast their own advantages, the Acacia excels in immediate usability, while the Neptune offers a unique tactile sensation that some may find irresistible. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your typing style.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
41g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Spring
Lengthened 21.5mm spring
Housing materials
The Huano Acacia and the TTC Neptune switches showcase distinct differences in their housing materials, which significantly influence their sound profiles and typing experiences. The Acacia utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, known for its stiffness and ability to produce a sharper, more resonant sound. This choice is particularly beneficial for users who appreciate a crisper auditory feedback, especially when utilizing RGB lighting due to the translucency of polycarbonate. In contrast, the Neptune's top housing is made from POM, a material that creates a deeper and more muted sound profile. This fundamental difference means that typing on the Acacia may feel more vibrant and lively, while the Neptune provides a more subdued and softer auditory experience.
When examining the bottom housing materials, the differences between the switches become even more pronounced. The Acacia opts for a nylon bottom housing, which is known for its softer qualities that contribute to a fuller, deeper sound profile. This allows for a rounded auditory feedback that can feel comforting during typing. Conversely, the Neptune features a polycarbonate bottom housing, which, like its top counterpart, lends itself to a sharper and crisper sound profile. This contrast in materials means that the overall sound experience of the two switches is influenced by the unique properties of their individual bottom housings, making the bottom-out sound of the Acacia deeper and fuller, while the Neptune's bottom housing reinforces a clearer, more resonant output.
Ultimately, the split between the top and bottom housing materials in both switches leads to an intricate interplay that shapes the typing experience. The Acacia combines a crisp, bright sound from its polycarbonate top with a deeper, fuller response from its nylon bottom, resulting in a balanced auditory profile. The Neptune, on the other hand, delivers a consistent sharpness from its polycarbonate bottom paired with a muted sound from its POM top, leading to a uniquely satisfying, albeit different, typing experience. Users who appreciate the acoustic properties affected by different materials will discover that the distinct combinations yield varied results, showcasing the nuanced artistry in switch design and the importance of material selection in crafting desired ergodynamic and auditory characteristics.
Weight
When comparing the Huano Acacia linear switch and the TTC Neptune linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The Acacia features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 55 grams, categorizing it as medium-light. In contrast, the Neptune has a lighter actuation force of 41 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it a light switch overall. This means that the Neptune requires less force to trigger a keystroke, which may be preferable for those who type for extended periods or engage in prolonged gaming sessions, as it can reduce finger fatigue. Conversely, the Acacia, with its slightly heavier actuation and bottom out force, may appeal to users looking for a more substantial typing experience and a firmer response when bottoming out. Thus, while both switches have their unique characteristics, the TTC Neptune is the lighter option, making it a suitable choice for users prioritizing comfort over longer durations, while the Huano Acacia offers a bit more weight for those who enjoy a stronger push feel.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Huano Acacia linear switch and the TTC Neptune linear switch, it is clear that the Acacia offers a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Neptune has a longer travel distance of 3.8 mm. This means that the Acacia would provide a more responsive feel, appealing to gamers and users who prefer quicker key presses, whereas the Neptune's longer travel distance may cater to those who appreciate a more pronounced tactile experience with greater depth. While both switches fall within the modern spectrum of travel distances, the Acacia's reduced distance could be considered advantageous for those seeking speed, while the Neptune may be favored by users who prefer a slightly deeper press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Neptune has an MSRP of $7.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Neptune for $5.09.
The Huano Acacia comes in at $3.39 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Huano Acacia linear switch isn't explicitly described in the provided information, but given its medium-light weight and generous lubrication, it can be expected to have a smoother sound profile, likely leaning toward a neutral tone. In contrast, the TTC Neptune linear switch is characterized by its low-pitched, muted, and thocky sound signature. This combination provides a bass-heavy and subdued auditory experience, making it a quieter option that minimizes the typical clacks associated with mechanical keyboards while still delivering a pleasurable "thock" when pressed. Users who prioritize sound profiles might find the Neptune to be a more satisfying choice due to its unique tonal qualities.
In terms of feel, the Acacia's lack of specific descriptors leaves it open to interpretation based on its general performance traits, which suggests a potentially smooth and comfortable typing experience attributed to its factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble. Conversely, the TTC Neptune switch is noted for its buttery, frictionless feel, which offers a seamless typing experience combined with a gummy sensation when bottoming out, akin to the soft resistance of a trampoline or a gummy bear. This blend of textures provides a dynamic and enjoyable tactile feedback that can enhance the typing experience considerably, positioning the Neptune as an excellent option for those seeking a unique touch and feel.
In conclusion, while the Huano Acacia linear switch may provide a smoother, more neutral sound and potentially a comfortable feel due to its construction, the TTC Neptune might appeal more to those looking for a rich auditory experience and a particularly smooth, engaging tactile sensation. Both switches offer enjoyable typing experiences, but they target slightly different preferences regarding sound and feel. Ultimately, trying both will be the best way to determine which aligns with your personal preferences as both are designed to deliver gratifying results in their own ways.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Huano Acacia linear switch and the TTC Neptune linear switch, consider your personal typing preferences and the environment in which you'll be using your keyboard. If you lean towards a medium-light bottom-out force of 55 grams and appreciate a typing experience that comes ready with excellent factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble, the Acacia might be the ideal choice for you. Its more pronounced sound profile may appeal to those who enjoy a slightly tactile feel without the clackiness of some other options. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter switch with a bottom-out force of 50 grams for swift typing, coupled with the unique internal structure that provides an almost frictionless glide, then the Neptune could be more suited to your needs. It offers a soft, thocky sound signature that creates an engaging auditory experience, particularly if you favor a deep and mellow sound while typing. Therefore, your choice should be influenced by whether you prioritize a slightly heavier feel and characteristically polished experience of the Acacia or the buttery, springy sensations paired with muted sound of the Neptune. Ultimately, either switch has something special to offer, so you can't go wrong with either one based on your individual typing style and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
