United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Huano Acacia vs. KTT Pine

An in-depth look at the Huano Acacia and the KTT Pine switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the perfect mechanical keyboard switch, the Huano Acacia and KTT Pine stand out as two compelling linear options, each with its own unique appeal. The Huano Acacia is celebrated for its medium-light weight, generous factory lubrication, and minimal stem wobble, which together create an exceptional typing experience right out of the box. This makes it an ideal choice for users who prioritize a balanced feel and a smooth performance without the need for extensive customization. In contrast, the KTT Pine offers a medium-heavy actuation force, creating a buttery smooth and effortless experience, aided by its polished, factory-lubed finish that reduces friction for seamless key travel. While both switches provide satisfying linear feedback, the Acacia leans towards a lighter touch, whereas the Pine is designed for those who appreciate a more substantial feel. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your typing style and preferences.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

55g

Bottom-out force

58g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

22mm single-staged spring

Spring

15.5mm gold-plated spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Huano Acacia and the KTT Pine switches exhibit both similarities and differences that significantly influence their acoustic properties and overall user experience. Both switches feature polycarbonate as the material for their top housings, which contributes to a sound profile characterized by a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper quality. The stiffness of polycarbonate enhances sound resonance, making it an optimal choice for achieving clarity, especially in applications that involve RGB lighting. This commonality in housing materials implies that users can expect a comparable brightness and clarity in sound when typing, regardless of which switch they ultimately choose.

However, notable differences arise with the bottom housing materials. The Huano Acacia utilizes nylon for its bottom housing, which inherently absorbs more sound due to its relative softness. This results in a deeper, fuller sound profile that contrasts with the KTT Pine's bottom housing, made of polycarbonate. The use of a stiffer material for the Pine amplifies the clarity of sounds produced at the bottom-out stage, leading to a sharper and more direct auditory feedback compared to the Acacia. Consequently, while the tops of both switches will yield similar sonic experiences thanks to their polycarbonate construction, the differing materials in the bottoms will distinctly affect how these switches sound when fully pressed down and released.

Ultimately, the combination of materials in the Huano Acacia and KTT Pine dictates the overall auditory characteristics and tactile sensations users will experience. The Acacia’s nylon bottom housing ensures a rounded auditory response upon bottoming out, while the Pine's polycarbonate bottom generates a more pronounced impact sound. This split in material choice creates a unique interplay between the two switches, as the Acacia emphasizes richness and warmth, while the Pine showcases clarity and sharpness. Thus, when selecting between these switches, users should consider how much they value the distinct sound profiles generated by each switch's respective housing materials.

Weight

The Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch exhibit similar actuation forces, both requiring 45 grams of pressure to register a keystroke. This equivalence means that users will experience comparable responsiveness when typing or gaming, making both switches suitable for prolonged use without significant fatigue. However, the bottom out forces differ between the two: the Acacia bottoming out at 55 grams, while the Pine requires a slightly heavier 58 grams of force. This means that while both switches are relatively light in actuation, the Pine offers a heavier overall feel when fully pressed down, catering to those who prefer a more substantial typing experience. Thus, for users who prioritize a lighter touch for extended sessions, the Huano Acacia may be the better choice, whereas those who enjoy a stronger tactile sensation may find the KTT Pine more appealing.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, it is clear that they differ considerably. The Acacia features a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Pine has a travel distance of 4 mm. This means that the Acacia offers a shorter travel distance compared to the Pine. If you favor quicker, more responsive key presses, the Acacia may appeal to you with its reduced travel distance, which can enhance speed during gaming or typing. On the other hand, the Pine’s longer travel distance of 4 mm may be more suitable for those who prefer a substantial key feel and a more pronounced bottom-out experience. Thus, if you value a rapid response, opt for the Acacia; however, for a more satisfying depth, the Pine would be the better choice.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.

The Huano Acacia comes in at $3.39 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Huano Acacia linear switch is prized for its relatively muted character, creating a pleasant and unobtrusive auditory experience, making it suitable for quiet environments or shared spaces. In contrast, the KTT Pine linear switch delivers a deeper sound profile with its bassy and low-pitched qualities. The richer tonal depth during keystrokes generates a more pronounced acoustic presence, which can add a satisfying auditory layer to the typing experience, albeit louder in a quieter setting. Ultimately, while both switches excel in sound, they cater to different preferences, with the Acacia being more discreet and the Pine offering a more resonant acoustic feedback.

In terms of feel, the Huano Acacia switch is characterized by its medium-light weight, which provides a comfortable typing experience without requiring excessive force. The generous factory lubrication and minimal stem wobble contribute to a smooth and consistent keystroke, allowing for a reliable and enjoyable touch when typing. On the other hand, the KTT Pine switch boasts a medium-heavy weight, providing a more substantial feel beneath the fingers. Its buttery and creamy characteristics offer significant ease of movement, allowing typists to glide from key to key effortlessly. The well-lubricated finish also minimizes friction, enhancing the overall smoothness of the typing experience. Each switch offers unique tactile feedback, suited for different typing preferences and styles.

In conclusion, both the Huano Acacia and the KTT Pine linear switches present excellent options for typists seeking a smooth and enjoyable experience. The Acacia’s more subdued sound and lighter feel appeal to those who prefer a quieter and less forceful typing interaction, while the Pine's deep, rich sound and buttery smoothness cater to those who seek a more pronounced auditory and tactile experience. Depending on one's priorities in sound and feel, either switch can deliver an outstanding performance tailored to individual preferences while allowing for similar results in daily typing tasks.

Conclusion

To conclude, choosing between the Huano Acacia linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch ultimately depends on your specific preferences and typing needs. If you prefer a medium-light switch that performs excellently right out of the box, then the Acacia is a solid choice. Its lower actuation force, generous factory lubrication, and minimal stem wobble make it ideal for those who value a smooth and comfortable typing experience without requiring any additional modifications. On the other hand, if you gravitate towards slightly heavier switches and appreciate a deeper, bassy sound profile, then the KTT Pine switch may be more suited to you. With its medium actuation force and buttery smooth feel, the Pine offers a more substantial typing experience while still maintaining comfort and fluidity. So, consider your typing style, sound preference, and the overall feel you're after before making your decision, as both switches have their unique qualities that cater to different experiences.

Mentioned in this article