Aflion Panda vs. KTT F2
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the KTT F2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, two popular options to consider are the Aflion Panda and the KTT F2. The Aflion Panda is renowned for its hyper-tactile sensation and deep thocky sound profile, making it a top choice for those who value hypertactility and sonorous audio feedback. On the other hand, the KTT F2 switches stand out with their distinct hollow sound signature and lightly textured feel, offering a comfortable typing experience with a tactile nuance. While the Panda is categorized as accented, invigorating, and resonant, and the F2 as feathery, mild, neutral, subdued, and subtle, both switches have their unique strengths and qualities. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
43g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
53g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
While both the Aflion Panda and the KTT F2 feature polycarbonate top housings that create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, they differ in their choice of bottom housing material. The Panda utilizes a nylon bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's softer properties that absorb more sound. In contrast, the F2 opts for a polycarbonate bottom housing, which maintains the sharp and clear sound profile associated with polycarbonate's stiffness. These differences in bottom housing material impact the overall sound and feel of the switches when pressed.
The aesthetic aspect of using polycarbonate in switch housings is worth noting for both the Panda and the F2, as the translucent nature of polycarbonate allows for RGB lighting to shine through, enhancing the visual appeal of the switches. However, the choice of nylon for the Panda's bottom housing versus polycarbonate for the F2's bottom housing also affects the tactile experience when typing. Typing on the Panda with a nylon bottom housing may feel softer and more cushioned, while typing on the F2 with a polycarbonate bottom housing may feel crisper and more responsive due to the different sound-absorbing properties of the two materials.
In terms of performance, the split between top and bottom housing materials in the Panda and F2 switches highlights the importance of these components in creating a unique typing experience. The characteristics of each housing material contribute to the overall sound profile and tactile feedback of the switches, with the bottom housing impacting the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing influences the sound upon key release. By understanding these differences in housing materials, users can choose a switch that aligns with their preferences for sound, feel, and aesthetics.
Weight
When comparing the Aflion Panda tactile switch to the KTT F2 linear switch in terms of actuation force and bottom out force, it is evident that the Panda requires a slightly heavier touch. This is seen in its actuation force of 50 grams and bottom out force of 60 grams, making it a medium-weight option. In contrast, the F2 switch is lighter, with an actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, giving it a medium-light feel. Both switches provide a satisfying typing experience, but the Panda offers a more substantial push feel compared to the lighter touch of the F2. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on individual preference for a lighter or heavier typing experience.
Travel distance
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the KTT F2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that the Panda has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the F2. In general, a longer travel distance can provide a more satisfying and tactile typing experience, while a shorter travel distance may be preferred for faster response times, especially by gamers. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on personal preferences for typing feel and responsiveness. If you prefer a switch with a bit more depth, the Panda may be the better option, but if you prefer a shorter travel distance for quicker feedback, the F2 could be more suitable. Both switches offer a different typing experience, so it's important to consider what feels most comfortable for you.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Aflion Panda tactile switch offers a resonant experience with a higher-pitched sound profile and a deep, immersive sound. On the other hand, the KTT F2 linear switch provides a neutral sound profile with a subdued, dampened sound when pressed. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, with the Panda being more resonant and immersive, while the F2 offers a quieter, more subtle sound signature.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Panda is described as accented and invigorating, providing a tactile and immersive typing sensation with a medium amount of tactility. In contrast, the F2 is characterized as feathery, mild, and subtle, offering a light and comfortable typing experience with a gentle resistance. Both switches provide distinct tactile feedback, with the Panda having a more pronounced tactile feel compared to the F2's lighter touch.
Overall, the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT F2 linear switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. If you prefer a super responsive tactile force with a deep thocky sound profile, the Panda would be a great choice. On the other hand, if you prefer a comfortable typing experience with a distinct hollow sound signature, the F2 would suit your preferences. Both switches excel in their own right, providing users with a variety of options depending on their personal preferences for sound and feel.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT F2 linear switch, consider the characteristics that best suit your preferences and typing needs. If you value a hyper-tactile sensation with a deep thocky sound profile and medium actuation force, the Aflion Panda switches would be the ideal choice for you. However, if you prefer a distinct hollow sound signature, comfortable typing experience with a medium-light actuation force, and lightly textured feel with each keystroke, then the KTT F2 switches might be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, whether you prioritize tactility and sonorous audio feedback or prefer a comfortable and lightly textured typing experience, both the Aflion Panda and KTT F2 switches offer unique features that cater to different preferences in the mechanical keyboard community.
Mentioned in this article
