Aflion Panda vs. HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Panda and Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U offer unique experiences for users seeking different characteristics. The Panda is celebrated for its hyper-tactile sensation and deep "thocky" sound profile, providing a super responsive tactile force that sets a new standard for those who value tactility and audio feedback. In contrast, the Hyacinth V2U boasts a fuller travel distance and a softer, bassier sound signature, marrying traditional typing experiences with modern features. While the Panda is characterized as 'Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Resonant', the Hyacinth V2U is labeled as 'Neutral', 'Polished', 'Silky', 'Subdued'. These differences make each switch appealing for different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
52g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.90 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The Aflion Panda and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U both feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is due to the stiffness of polycarbonate, which leads to a more clear and resonant sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate is especially useful for switches that plan to use RGB lighting. While both switches have the same material for their top housing, their bottom housings differ.
The Panda's nylon bottom housing creates a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing, as nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound than harder plastics. On the other hand, the Hyacinth V2U also features a nylon bottom housing, which contributes to a similar deep and full sound profile when typing. The use of nylon in the bottom housing of these switches allows for a duller and rounder sound compared to the sharper sound produced by the polycarbonate top housing.
Overall, the Aflion Panda and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U offer a unique combination of housing materials that result in a satisfying typing experience. The split between the top and bottom housing materials allows for distinct sound profiles depending on whether you are pressing down on a key or letting go. While both switches share the benefits of using polycarbonate in the top housing for a clear and resonant sound, their differences in bottom housing material contribute to a varied typing experience with a depth of sound that can be appreciated by keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a slightly heavier actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch. The Panda requires 50 grams of force to actuate and 60 grams to bottom out, while the Hyacinth V2U needs 45 grams and 52 grams respectively. Both switches fall into the medium range of actuation and bottom out forces, offering a balance between light and heavy typing experiences. For those who prefer a lighter touch, the Hyacinth V2U would be the better choice, while the Panda would suit those who enjoy a bit more resistance for a more substantial typing feel. Regardless, both switches provide a comfortable typing experience for extended periods of use.
Travel distance
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch has a travel distance of 3.9 mm. This makes the Hyacinth V2U slightly shorter in travel distance compared to the Panda. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Panda being slightly on the longer side. Gamers who value faster response times may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Hyacinth V2U, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may lean towards the Panda. Ultimately, both switches offer a tactile typing experience, but the slight difference in travel distance may impact the overall feel of the switch for different preferences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The HMX Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U for $2.91.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Aflion Panda emits a resonant, high-pitched sound profile that provides an immersive auditory experience with a clean and sharp tone. On the other hand, the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U produces a softer, bassier sound signature due to its nylon material construction and enhanced with a 22mm spring for added bounciness. The Hyacinth V2U offers a more subdued and neutral sound compared to the bold and pronounced thocky echo of the Panda, catering to those who prefer a quieter typing experience. However, both switches can deliver satisfying sound profiles depending on personal preference, with the Panda offering a more resonant and immersive audio feedback, while the Hyacinth V2U provides a softer and more mellow sound signature.
In terms of feel, the Aflion Panda is known for its accented and invigorating tactile sensation, offering a medium level of tactility that is not overwhelming but still provides a noticeable feedback. This adds to an immersive typing sensation that is snappy and reactive, enhancing the overall typing experience. On the other hand, the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U boasts a polished and silky feel, providing smooth and refined key travel with reduced friction. The V2U switches offer a sleek typing experience that minimizes resistance when pressing and releasing keys, catering to those who prioritize a smooth and effortless typing feel.
In conclusion, the Aflion Panda and Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U switches offer distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Panda excels in providing a hyper-tactile sensation with a resonant and thocky sound profile, while the Hyacinth V2U focuses on delivering a fuller travel distance with a softer and more subdued sound signature. Both switches cater to different preferences, with the Panda being ideal for those seeking a bold tactile experience and immersive auditory feedback, while the Hyacinth V2U appeals to users looking for a smoother and quieter typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for tactile feedback and sound profiles.
Conclusion
In conclusion, when choosing between the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Sillyworks Hyacinth V2U linear switch, you should consider your preferences and priorities. If you value a hyper-tactile sensation with a deep "thocky" sound profile, along with a medium bottom out force, the Panda would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a fuller travel distance, a bouncier feel, and a softer, bassier sound signature, the Hyacinth V2U with its medium-light bottom out force could be the better option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for tactility, sound profile, and overall typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
