Aflion Panda vs. KTT Laurel
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the KTT Laurel switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, two popular options to consider are the Aflion Panda and the KTT Laurel. The Aflion Panda is a tactile switch that is best known for its unparalleled hyper-tactile sensation and deeply satisfying "thocky" sound profile. It offers a super responsive tactile force paired with a sonorous audio feedback, making it the ideal choice for those who value hypertactility and a full-bodied typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel is a linear switch that offers a medium-light touch with a perfect balance of responsiveness and comfort. It features a full POM housing, short travel, and a long pole design, resulting in a smooth and enjoyable typing experience. Additionally, the KTT Laurel switch provides a subtly low-pitched sound profile. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the perfect switch for your needs.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
43g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
22m spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Aflion Panda and the KTT Laurel have distinct differences in terms of sound profiles and aesthetics. The Panda's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. Its translucency is ideal for showcasing RGB lighting. In contrast, the Laurel's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. While both materials offer unique sound profiles, the Panda's polycarbonate is more focused on clarity and resonance, whereas the Laurel's POM emphasizes a pleasing and deeper sound.
Moving on to the bottom housings, the Panda's nylon bottom housing elicits a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer plastic composition. The nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound compared to harder plastics. Similarly, the Laurel's POM bottom housing also produces a deep and muted sound. Although they share similarities in sound profiles, the Panda's nylon provides a fuller sound due to its ability to absorb more sound.
While the top and bottom housings have different materials, each housing material brings its unique qualities to the switch. Pressing down on the switch will primarily result in feeling the impact and sound qualities of the bottom housing. The bottom housing has a more significant influence on the bottom-out sound and feel. Conversely, the top housing plays a crucial role in the sound produced when releasing a key. Therefore, even with contrasting materials, the overall experience and outcome of using the switches will have some similarities as the sound profile is split between the top and bottom of the switch.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch, several differences can be observed. The Panda tactile switch has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, which can be considered as medium. On the other hand, the Laurel linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, which falls into the light category.
Weight considerations play a significant role in the selection process as it pertains to personal preference. For individuals who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Laurel linear switch with its lighter actuation force would be a suitable choice. This lighter weight allows for extended typing periods, making it ideal for work or long gaming sessions. In contrast, those who prefer a heavier push feel and a more substantial typing experience may opt for the Aflion Panda tactile switch. Its heavier actuation force provides a satisfying resistance while typing.
It is important to note that both switches aim to provide the desired tactile experience for users, albeit through different approaches. The Aflion Panda tactile switch offers a slightly heavier actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Laurel linear switch. However, individuals seeking similar results can still achieve a comparable typing experience with either switch, as both aim to fulfill the user's preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
In summary, the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch differ in terms of actuation force and bottom out force. The Panda switch offers a medium actuation force and bottom out force, while the Laurel switch provides a lighter typing experience with its lighter actuation force. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches depends on the individual's preference for typing feel, whether they prefer a lighter or more substantial push.
Travel distance
The Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch have different travel distances. The Panda has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the Laurel has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. Both switches offer a decent amount of travel distance, with the Panda being slightly longer than the Laurel. A 4.0mm travel distance is more traditional, providing a satisfactory depth for many users. On the other hand, the 3.5mm travel distance of the Laurel offers a slightly shallower key press. Gamers often prefer shorter travel distances for faster response times, so if you prioritize responsiveness, the Laurel may be a better choice. However, some individuals find shorter travel distances too abrupt, and if you prefer a more substantial key press, the longer 4.0mm travel distance of the Panda would be more suitable. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches depends on personal preference and the specific needs of the user.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The KTT Laurel has an MSRP of $4.42 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Laurel for $3.95.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is known for its resonant and thocky sound profile. Typing on these switches will provide a higher-pitched sound that is clean and sharp, creating an immersive auditory experience. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel linear switch has a low-pitched sound profile. This means that the sound from these switches will be more bass-heavy and mellow compared to higher-pitched switches. However, it is important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Aflion Panda is described as accented and invigorating. These switches offer a medium level of tactility, providing a prominent amount of feedback without being overwhelming. They also have a firm actuation force, creating a snappy and reactive feel that enhances the typing sensation. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel switch is described as snappy. These switches are super responsive, which can be attributed to longer or dual-staged springs. This results in a typing experience that feels more alive and responsive.
Taking all the available information into account, it is clear that the Aflion Panda and KTT Laurel switches offer distinct subjective qualities. The Panda provides a hyper-tactile sensation with a resonant sound profile, while the Laurel offers a comfortable and responsive typing experience with a low-pitched sound profile. Both switches have their own unique features and advantages. However, if you are looking for a similar result in terms of sound or feel, it is important to consider factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used, as they can greatly influence the overall experience.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch, it ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing style. If you value a super responsive tactile force and a deep thocky sound profile, then the Panda switch would be an excellent choice for you. Its medium bottom out force of 60 grams provides a balanced typing experience, while the hyper-tactile sensation and sonorous audio feedback add to its appeal. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter switch with a subtle low-pitched sound profile, the Laurel switch might be more suitable. With its 50-gram bottom out force, full POM housing, and short travel, the Laurel strikes a balance between responsiveness and comfort. Additionally, the snappy feel of the Laurel switch enhances the typing experience. Ultimately, your decision should be based on whether you prioritize hypertactility and a deep sound profile (Panda) or responsiveness and comfort (Laurel).
Mentioned in this article
