Aflion Panda vs. KTT Lightning
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the KTT Lightning switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Panda and the KTT Lightning offer two distinct options to suit different preferences and needs. The Aflion Panda is highly regarded for its unrivaled tactility and deep "thocky" sound, making it a go-to choice for those who value a hyper-tactile sensation and a full-bodied, sonorous audio feedback. On the other hand, the KTT Lightning is known for being a linear switch that prioritizes speed and responsiveness, making it the ideal option for situations where split-second decisions can determine success or failure. Typing on the Lightning offers a slick and clacky feel, providing a more polished experience. However, let's delve deeper beyond these generalities so you can make an informed decision about which switch is best suited for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
43g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The housing materials of the Aflion Panda and the KTT Lightning have some similarities and differences. Both switches use polycarbonate for their top housing material. This choice results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile for both switches. The relatively stiffer nature of polycarbonate enhances the clarity and resonance of the sound. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that utilize RGB lighting. Therefore, both the Aflion Panda and the KTT Lightning share similar characteristics when it comes to their polycarbonate top housing.
However, there is a difference in the bottom housing material of the two switches. The Panda employs a nylon bottom housing, while the Lightning also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing on switches. This is due to the relatively softer nature of nylon, which absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics. Consequently, the nylon bottom housing of both the Aflion Panda and the KTT Lightning contributes to a duller and rounder sound when bottoming out keys.
In terms of overall sound and feel, the distribution of housing materials plays a role. The qualities of the bottom housing material have a greater impact on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down on the switch. On the other hand, the top housing material influences the sound when releasing a key. Therefore, although the Aflion Panda and the KTT Lightning may have different bottom housing materials, the overall switch experience will still yield similar results with regards to their sound profiles.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the KTT Lightning linear switch, there are some notable differences. The Panda has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, which falls into the medium range. On the other hand, the Lightning switch has a lighter actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, categorizing it as a light switch.
Considering weight as an important factor, those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Lightning switch. This lighter actuation force allows for typing over longer periods without fatigue, making it suitable for work or extended gaming sessions. In contrast, some users crave a stronger push feel to enhance the tactile typing experience. These individuals may prefer the Panda switch with its slightly heavier force. The actuation force of the Panda provides a more substantial feedback when pressing the keys, enhancing the overall typing experience.
It is important to note that while there is a difference in actuation and bottom out forces between these two switches, both offer similar results when it comes to triggering keystrokes. Both switches provide the necessary force to initiate a keystroke, ensuring efficient and responsive typing performance. However, the choice between the two ultimately comes down to individual preference, with the Panda offering a slightly heavier feel and the Lightning providing a lighter touch.
Travel distance
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the KTT Lightning linear switch has a travel distance of 3 mm. The Panda's travel distance of 4 mm is considered more traditional, offering a deeper key press feeling. On the other hand, the Lightning's travel distance of 3 mm is more shallow and is preferred by gamers for faster response times. If you value quick responsiveness, the Lightning switch would be the better option. However, some individuals find shorter travel distances to be too abrupt and prefer a more substantial key press. In this case, the Panda switch with its longer travel distance would be the preferred choice. Both switches offer different tactile experiences, catering to different preferences and needs.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is best known for its resonant sound profile. Typing on these switches produces a higher-pitched sound that is clean and sharp. This switch provides an immersive auditory experience, making it a great choice for those who value a sonorous audio feedback. On the other hand, the KTT Lightning linear switch is described as clacky, producing a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. It has a crisp, bright, and percussive sound profile. Additionally, it is mentioned that high-pitched switches like the Lightning offer a sharp and crisp sound. If you prefer a more rich and bassy sound, the Lightning may not be the ideal choice. Overall, while the sound characteristics differ between these two switches, both offer unique and enjoyable auditory experiences.
Moving on to feel, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is described as accented, providing a medium level of tactility that is not overwhelming but still prominent. This switch offers an invigorating typing sensation, with pronounced feedback and a snappy feel. It requires moderate to firm actuation force, ensuring a responsive typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Lightning linear switch is labeled as subtle and polished. It has a gentle resistance that is not feather-light but still maintains a light typing feel. This switch offers smooth and refined key travel, thanks to reduced friction and a sleek finish. It should be noted that the Panda offers a more prominent tactile experience, while the Lightning focuses on a smooth and polished typing experience.
Taking into account the available information, the Aflion Panda tactile switch stands out for its hyper-tactile sensation and deep "thocky" sound profile. It is an excellent choice for those who value hypertactility and enjoy a full-bodied audio feedback. On the other hand, the KTT Lightning linear switch is geared towards speed and precision, making it ideal for situations where milliseconds can make a difference. The Lightning offers a slick typing experience with a clacky sound profile. While these switches differ in their subjective qualities, they each provide unique and desirable experiences for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. If you are looking for a similar level of tactility and sound to the Panda but prefer a linear switch, the Lightning switch may offer a comparable typing experience. Ultimately, both switches offer their own distinct qualities and cater to different preferences and typing styles.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you value a super responsive tactile force and a full-bodied, sonorous audio feedback, along with a medium bottom out force, then the Aflion Panda tactile switch is the way to go. It offers an unparalleled, hyper-tactile sensation and a deep thocky sound profile, creating an immersive typing experience. On the other hand, if you prioritize speed and milliseconds can make a difference for you, the KTT Lightning linear switch is the better choice. With a light bottom out force and a slick type feel, it provides a clacky sound profile that is crisp, bright, and percussive. Additionally, if you prefer switches with a gentle resistance and a polished finish for a smooth typing experience, the Lightning switch would be suitable. Ultimately, the decision comes down to whether you prioritize hypertactility and a resonant sound profile (Panda) or speed and a clacky sound profile (Lightning), as well as your preference for the feel of the switch.
Mentioned in this article
