Aflion Panda vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Panda and Jerrzi Lotus V2 stand out as notable options, each offering unique features catering to different preferences. The Panda is a tactile switch celebrated for its unparalleled hyper-tactile sensation and deep "thocky" sound profile. It appeals to users looking for a super responsive tactile force and a full-bodied, sonorous audio feedback, making it perfect for those who value hypertactility. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 is a linear switch that doesn't have a standout feature, making it a versatile choice suitable for various typing styles. While these general points provide a glimpse into each switch's characteristics, further exploration is necessary to determine the best fit for individual needs. Let's delve deeper beyond these overviews to help you make the most informed decision.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Aflion Panda and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 both feature unique housing materials that contribute to the sound profile of the switches. The Panda's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper, higher-pitched sound, while the Lotus V2's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. In terms of aesthetics, polycarbonate is translucent and ideal for RGB lighting effects, whereas POM offers a more classic look. Both materials are known for their stiffness, but polycarbonate is stiffer, creating a clearer and resonant sound compared to POM.
On the other hand, the bottom housings of the Panda and Lotus V2 differ in material. The Panda utilizes a nylon bottom housing, known for creating a deeper and fuller sound due to its softer nature absorbing more sound. In contrast, the Lotus V2 features a POM bottom housing that also produces a deep and muted sound profile. While both materials offer a similar sound profile in terms of depth, the differences in texture and absorption of sound may lead to slight variations in the overall typing experience.
When it comes to typing experience, the combination of top and bottom housings plays a significant role in determining the overall sound and feel of the switch. The Panda's split between polycarbonate top and nylon bottom creates a dynamic sound profile, with the stiffer top housing affecting the sound when releasing a key, while the softer bottom housing influences the bottom-out sound and feel. Conversely, the Lotus V2's use of POM for both top and bottom housings results in a consistent and pleasing deep sound profile throughout the typing process. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of sound, feel, and aesthetics.
Weight
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a slightly heavier actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch with an actuation force of 45 grams. However, the Panda also has a heavier bottom out force of 60 grams, whereas the Lotus V2's bottom out force is unknown. This means that the Panda will provide a more substantial typing experience overall, with both a higher actuation force and bottom out force. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, the Lotus V2 may be the better option with its lighter actuation force. In general, if you prefer a lighter typing experience, the Lotus V2 would be the more suitable choice, while those who enjoy a more substantial feel might lean towards the Aflion Panda.
Travel distance
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is slightly longer than the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch with a travel distance of 3.4 mm. The Panda's travel distance is more traditional, while the Lotus V2 offers a slightly shallower travel distance. Gamers may prefer the Lotus V2 for its shorter travel distance, providing faster response times. However, those who prefer a more substantial key press may lean towards the Panda with its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for travel distance and key feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Aflion Panda tactile switch offers a resonant and deeply satisfying "thocky" sound profile that truly immerses the user in their typing experience. The sharp and clean sound of the Panda adds to the overall tactile sensation and creates a unique auditory feedback that is highly sought after by mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. On the other hand, information about the sound profile of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is currently unavailable, which makes it difficult to directly compare the two in this aspect. However, it is important to note that the sound of a switch is influenced by various factors, including the keyboard case and keycaps used.
When it comes to feel, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is often described as offering an invigorating and accentuated tactile experience. This means that the switch provides a moderate to firm actuation force, pronounced feedback, and a snappy feel that enhances the typing sensation. The tactile bump of the Panda is not overwhelming, but still prominent enough to be satisfying for users who prefer a more tactile typing experience. Unfortunately, there is currently no available information on the feel of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, making it challenging to compare the two switches directly in this aspect. However, based on the descriptions of the Panda, it is safe to assume that the Lotus V2 may provide a smooth and linear typing experience without the tactile bump present in the Panda.
In conclusion, the Aflion Panda tactile switch excels in offering a hyper-tactile sensation, a deep "thocky" sound profile, and an invigorating tactile feedback. While the subjective qualities of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch are not currently known, it is clear that the two switches offer different experiences - one focusing on tactile feedback and sound, while the other likely excels in providing a smooth and consistent linear typing experience. Depending on the user's preferences for typing feel and sound, both switches have their unique strengths that cater to different preferences within the mechanical keyboard community.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, you should choose the Aflion Panda if you value a hyper-tactile sensation, deep thocky sound profile, and a medium bottom out force of 60 grams. The Panda is perfect for those who enjoy a super responsive tactile force and a full-bodied, sonorous audio feedback. On the other hand, you may want to go for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 if you prefer a switch with no available bottom out force information. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your preferences for tactile feedback, sound profile, and actuation force. Choose the switch that best suits your typing style and preferences for the ultimate mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
