United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Aflion Panda vs. Gazzew LT

An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the Gazzew LT switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, there are numerous options available, each with its own unique characteristics. Two switches that stand out in the market are the Aflion Panda and the Gazzew LT. The Aflion Panda is a tactile switch, known for its unparalleled, hyper-tactile sensation and profoundly "thocky" sound profile. This switch is perfect for those who value a super responsive tactile force and enjoy a full-bodied, sonorous audio feedback while typing. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT is a linear switch that offers an auditory symphony of deep, resonant thockiness with its enticing lilac hue. It provides a seamless glide with every keystroke, making typing a smooth and enjoyable experience. So, while the Panda focuses on hypertactility and a resonant sound, the LT emphasizes a bassy, thocky audio feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the perfect switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

65g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

N/A

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Proprietary Gazzew blend

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Single-stage 15mm long spring

Spring

Stainless steel Korean spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Aflion Panda and the Gazzew LT exhibit distinct differences in terms of sound profile and material composition. The Panda's polycarbonate top housing lends itself to a sharper and crisper sound due to its stiffer nature. This stiffness allows for a clear and resonant sound profile, making it an ideal choice for those seeking a high-pitched sound with RGB lighting capabilities. In contrast, the LT's proprietary Gazzew blend top housing, commonly known as "boba plastic," delivers a rich and deep sound profile. This unique plastic blend's softness contributes to a more mellow and full-bodied sound experience.

When it comes to the bottom housing, the Panda employs a classic switch material: nylon. Nylon is known for its ability to produce a deeper and fuller sound profile. Its relatively softer nature allows for more sound absorption, resulting in a rounder and duller sound. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT utilizes its proprietary Gazzew blend "boba plastic" for the bottom housing. Similar to its impact on the top housing, this special plastic blend contributes to a rich and deep sound profile due to its softness. Both the nylon and Gazzew blend bottom housings offer a desirable sound experience but with slightly different characteristics.

While the top and bottom housings of the Aflion Panda and the Gazzew LT differ in material composition, it is important to note the impact these materials have on the overall sound and feel of the switch. The qualities brought by each housing material are distributed between the top and bottom, enhancing different aspects of the typing experience. The bottom housing has more influence on the bottom-out sound and feel, providing a tactile response when a key is pressed down. Meanwhile, the top housing is responsible for the sound produced when a key is released, contributing to the overall auditory experience. Thus, while the specific housing materials may differ, both switches offer the potential for a satisfying and impactful typing experience.

Weight

When comparing the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Gazzew LT linear switch, their actuation and bottom out forces differ slightly. The Aflion Panda has an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, both of which fall into the medium range. On the other hand, the actuation force of the Gazzew LT switch is currently unknown, but it has a bottom out force of 65 grams, classifying it as medium-heavy.

The weight of a switch is an important factor to consider, as it can greatly impact the typing experience. Some individuals prefer a lighter switch, as it allows for longer periods of comfortable typing, making it suitable for those who use their keyboards extensively at work or during extended gaming sessions. Meanwhile, others may prefer a heavier switch that provides a stronger push feel, offering a more substantial typing experience.

If comparing the actuation force, one must note that the exact value for the LT switch is unavailable. However, if it is similar to the Panda switch, with a force of 50 grams, then their actuation forces would be the same. In terms of the bottom out force, the Panda switch is lighter at 60 grams, whereas the Gazzew LT switch is slightly heavier with 65 grams.

Ultimately, individuals seeking a medium actuation force and bottom out force can opt for the Aflion Panda tactile switch. Meanwhile, those who desire a slightly heavier typing experience may prefer the Gazzew LT linear switch, despite the unknown actuation force.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Gazzew LT linear switch, it is clear that there is a difference in their respective distances. The Panda has a travel distance of 4 mm, while the LT has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.2 mm. The Panda's 4 mm travel distance falls into the more traditional range, offering a deeper key press experience. On the other hand, the LT's 3.2 mm travel distance is shallower and may appeal to those who prioritize faster response times, such as gamers. The choice between the two ultimately depends on personal preference - if you value a more responsive typing experience, the shorter travel distance of the LT may be more suitable. However, if you prefer a deeper and more satisfying key press, the Panda's longer travel distance would be a better option. Despite their differences, both switches offer a unique tactile experience and can deliver similar results depending on the user's preferences.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.

The Gazzew LT comes in at $6.50 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is best known for its unparalleled "thocky" sound profile. When typing on these switches, users can expect a deep, sonorous audio feedback that resonates with each keystroke. The sound profile is clean, sharp, and immersive, providing a unique auditory experience. On the other hand, the Gazzew LT linear switch offers a different type of sound experience. Described as "bassy," these switches produce a deeper and richer sound profile during key presses. The lower frequency range resembles the depth and richness associated with bass tones. Additionally, the LT switches are characterized as "thocky," producing a satisfying and soft "knock" or "thud" sound when pressed and released. It is also worth noting that the choice of keyboard board and keycaps can influence the overall sound of the switches.

In terms of feel, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is described as an "accented" switch. This means it falls into the category of a medium tactile switch that provides a prominent amount of tactility without being overwhelming or too subtle. Users can expect a tactile sensation that is invigorating, offering pronounced feedback, moderate to firm actuation force, and a snappy and reactive feel. On the other hand, there is no specific description available for the feel of the Gazzew LT linear switch, so it is unknown how it compares to the tactile experience of the Panda switch.

Considering the available information, it is clear that both the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Gazzew LT linear switch offer unique and desirable qualities. The Panda switch stands out with its hyper-tactile sensation and "thocky" sound profile that sets a gold standard for hypertactility and sonorous audio feedback. On the other hand, the LT switch entices with its lilac hue and delivers a seamless glide with every keystroke, accompanied by a deep and resonant "thocky" sound. While there is limited information on the feel of the LT switch, it is safe to assume that it will provide a satisfactory typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, tactility, and aesthetic considerations.

Conclusion

To sum up, if you prioritize having a hyper-tactile sensation and a deep, sonorous audio feedback, the Aflion Panda tactile switch would be the ideal choice for you. With its medium bottom out force of 60 grams, the Panda offers a medium-tactile experience that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. Additionally, the Panda's "thocky" sound profile provides a clean and sharp resonance when typing. On the other hand, if you prefer a linear switch with a heavier bottom out force of 65 grams, the Gazzew LT would be the better option. The LT switches are known for their deep, resonant "thockiness" and seamless glide during keystrokes. While information about the LT's feel is not available, its captivating lilac hue adds an aesthetic appeal to your keyboard. Ultimately, the decision between the Aflion Panda and Gazzew LT boils down to personal preferences for typing experience and sound profile.

Mentioned in this article