United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Aflion Panda vs. Gateron Mini i

An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the Gateron Mini i switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Panda and the Gateron Mini i stand out as excellent choices within the tactile switch category. The Aflion Panda is renowned for its hyper-tactile sensation and deep thocky sound profile, making it ideal for those who prioritize responsiveness and audio feedback. On the other hand, the Gateron Mini i offers a more subtle tactility and a muted sound profile, catering to individuals seeking a quieter typing experience ideal for office settings. While the Panda excels in providing a full-bodied, resonant typing experience, the Mini i offers a lightweight and easy-to-press feel suitable for long hours of comfortable typing. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

40g

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.40 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Single-stage 15mm long spring

Spring

22mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The Aflion Panda and the Gateron Mini i both feature nylon bottom housings, which elicit a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the material's softer nature that absorbs more sound compared to harder plastics. This results in a duller and rounder sound when typing on these switches. However, the Panda stands out with its polycarbonate top housing, creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The use of polycarbonate in the top housing leads to a more clear and resonant sound, making it ideal for those who prefer a more pronounced typing experience, especially when accompanied by RGB lighting.

In terms of aesthetic appeal, the Panda's polycarbonate top housing offers a translucent look that is commonly associated with a sharper and more vibrant sound profile. This is particularly useful for users who enjoy customizable RGB lighting effects on their keyboards. On the other hand, the Mini i's nylon top housing provides a classic appearance that emphasizes a deeper and fuller sound profile. While both switches feature nylon bottom housings that contribute to the overall sound experience, the differences in top housing materials highlight the unique sound characteristics each switch offers.

Overall, the choice between the Aflion Panda and the Gateron Mini i will depend on individual preferences in sound profiles and aesthetics. The Panda's combination of polycarbonate top housing for a sharp sound and nylon bottom housing for a fuller sound may appeal to those seeking a balanced typing experience. On the other hand, the Mini i's consistent use of nylon housing throughout offers a classic and unified sound profile that resonates with a different set of users. Whether you prioritize a sharper, crisper sound or a deeper, fuller sound, both switches provide unique qualities that cater to diverse preferences.

Weight

The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a slightly heavier actuation force and bottom out force compared to the Gateron Mini i tactile switch. The Panda requires 50 grams of force to actuate and 60 grams to bottom out, making it more medium in terms of weight. On the other hand, the Mini i only needs 40 grams to actuate and 50 grams to bottom out, which makes it lighter. The difference in weight between the two switches can offer different typing experiences to users. Some may prefer the lighter feel of the Mini i for extended typing sessions, while others may enjoy the more substantial push of the Panda for a more satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is considered more traditional and provides a deeper keystroke feel. On the other hand, the Gateron Mini i tactile switch has a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it ideal for those who prefer a quicker response. Gamers, in particular, may lean towards the Gateron Mini i for its shorter travel distance, allowing for faster keystrokes. However, those who enjoy a more substantial key press may find the Aflion Panda to be more to their liking due to its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and feel.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.

The Gateron Mini i comes in at $6.00 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Aflion Panda offers a resonant typing experience with a deep "thocky" sound profile, providing an immersive auditory experience. On the other hand, the Gateron Mini i switch has a more neutral sound profile, with a moderate actuation force requirement that is suitable for various purposes. Both switches offer distinct sound qualities that cater to different preferences, with the Panda emphasizing a rich, resonant sound while the Mini i focuses on a more neutral and muted audio feedback.

When it comes to feel, the Panda switch is described as accented and invigorating, providing a medium tactile experience with pronounced feedback and a reactive feel. On the other hand, the Gateron Mini i switch is characterized as bouncy, easy-to-press, mild, snappy, subtle, and stepped, offering a range of tactile sensations from gentle resistance to a more lively and responsive typing experience. Both switches offer different tactile experiences that cater to varying preferences, with the Panda emphasizing a more pronounced tactility while the Mini i offers a lighter and more spring-like feel.

In conclusion, the Aflion Panda and Gateron Mini i switches offer distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Panda excels in providing a deep "thocky" sound profile and a hyper-tactile typing experience, while the Mini i offers a more neutral sound profile and a range of tactile sensations from gentle to bouncy. Depending on your preference for sound and feel, both switches provide unique typing experiences that can enhance your overall keyboarding experience. Ultimately, choosing between the two will depend on your individual preferences for sound, tactility, and typing comfort.

Conclusion

In summary, when deciding between the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Gateron Mini i tactile switch, you should consider the level of tactility and sound profile you prefer. If you value a hyper-tactile sensation with a deep thocky sound profile, the Aflion Panda would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a more subtle tactile experience with a fairly muted sound profile that is suitable for office environments, the Gateron Mini i would be a better fit. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences for typing experience and the environment in which you will be using the keyboard. Choose the switch that best suits your needs and typing style for an optimal typing experience.

Mentioned in this article