Aflion Panda vs. TTC Neptune
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the TTC Neptune switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Aflion Panda, a tactile switch, to the TTC Neptune, a linear switch, it's clear that both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Panda is renowned for its hyper-tactile sensation and deep "thocky" sound profile, making it ideal for those who value a satisfying tactile feedback. On the other hand, the Neptune stands out for its innovative internal structure that provides a smooth and frictionless typing experience, reminiscent of chewy textures like mochi. While the Panda is accented, invigorating, and resonant, the Neptune is described as buttery, gummy, and subdued. Both switches have their own strengths and appeals, but diving deeper into their characteristics will help you make the best decision based on your preferences.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
41g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
Lengthened 21.5mm spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Aflion Panda and the TTC Neptune, it is evident that they differ significantly in their top housing materials. The Panda features a polycarbonate top housing, known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, especially ideal for showcasing RGB lighting due to its translucency. On the other hand, the Neptune utilizes a POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound profile. This contrast in sound profiles signifies distinct audio experiences when typing on switches of these two keyboards.
However, when examining the bottom housing materials of the Panda and the Neptune, a different pattern emerges. The Panda incorporates a nylon bottom housing, which generates a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's softer nature that absorbs more sound. In contrast, the Neptune opts for a polycarbonate bottom housing, which mirrors the top housing material of the Panda in creating a sharper, crisper sound profile. This similarity in bottom housing materials suggests that typing experience on the bottom of the switches may share more commonalities between the two keyboards compared to their top housing materials.
In terms of overall typing experience, the choice of housing materials in the Panda and the Neptune influences sound profiles when pressing down on the switch and letting go of a key. The split between top and bottom housing qualities in each keyboard results in a nuanced typing experience, where different aspects of sound and feel are accentuated depending on which material is more prominent in a specific area of the switch. This emphasizes the importance of housing materials in creating a unique typing experience for users of both the Aflion Panda and the TTC Neptune.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the TTC Neptune linear switch, it is evident that the Panda has a heavier actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Neptune's lighter actuation force of 41 grams. Similarly, the Panda also has a heavier bottom out force of 60 grams, whereas the Neptune has a lighter bottom out force of 50 grams. The Panda provides a more substantial typing experience with its medium actuation and bottom out forces, making it suitable for those who prefer a stronger push feel. On the other hand, the Neptune offers a lighter touch, which is ideal for those looking for a smoother and lighter typing experience, suitable for prolonged typing or gaming sessions. In both cases, users can expect reliable and consistent results based on their preference for either a lighter or heavier switch.
Travel distance
The Aflion Panda tactile switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, making it slightly longer than the TTC Neptune linear switch, which has a travel distance of 3.8 mm. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Panda on the longer end and the Neptune slightly shorter. Gamers may appreciate the shorter travel distance of the Neptune for quicker response times, while those who prefer a more substantial key press may lean towards the Panda. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches may come down to personal preference and typing style.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The TTC Neptune has an MSRP of $7.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Neptune for $5.09.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Aflion Panda offers a resonant and thocky typing experience, characterized by a higher-pitched sound profile and a deep, satisfying "thud" when the keys are pressed and released. On the other hand, the TTC Neptune provides a low-pitched and muted sound signature, producing a bass-heavy and mellow tone that is refined and unobtrusive. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, with the Panda catering to those who appreciate a more immersive and tactile sound profile, while the Neptune appeals to users looking for a quieter and more subdued typing experience.
When it comes to feel, the Aflion Panda is known for its accented and invigorating tactile feedback, offering a medium level of tactility that is pronounced yet not overwhelming. In contrast, the TTC Neptune is described as buttery, gummy, frictionless, mild, and polished, providing a smooth and effortless typing experience with minimal resistance or friction. The Panda focuses on delivering a tactile sensation that is responsive and engaging, whereas the Neptune prioritizes a seamless and uniform typing sensation that feels luxurious and polished.
In conclusion, the Aflion Panda and TTC Neptune switches offer distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Panda excels in providing a hyper-tactile and resonant typing experience with a deep thocky sound profile, appealing to users who value tactile feedback and a rich auditory experience. On the other hand, the Neptune stands out for its smooth and frictionless feel, accompanied by a low-pitched and muted sound signature that ensures a refined and effortless typing experience. Depending on individual preferences for sound and feel, both switches offer unique benefits that cater to different typing preferences and can provide equally satisfying results depending on the user's personal preferences.
Conclusion
In summary, if you are looking for a super tactile and "thocky" typing experience with a medium bottom out force, the Aflion Panda tactile switch would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth, almost frictionless typing experience with a light bottom out force and a more muted sound profile, the TTC Neptune linear switch would be more suitable for your preferences. Consider your typing style, preference for tactility, and desired sound and feel when making your decision between these two unique switches. Ultimately, the choice between the Aflion Panda and TTC Neptune switches will depend on what characteristics you prioritize in your mechanical keyboard experience.
Mentioned in this article
