Aflion Panda vs. Bsun Tuzi (Bunny)
An in-depth look at the Aflion Panda and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When choosing between mechanical keyboard switches, two popular options are the Aflion Panda, a tactile switch, and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny), a linear switch. The Panda is renowned for its hyper-tactile sensation and deep "thocky" sound profile, making it a top choice for those who value a responsive tactile force and sonorous audio feedback. On the other hand, the Tuzi (Bunny) offers a refined typing experience with a blend of clack and smoothness thanks to its modified LY stem and meticulously designed components. While the Panda is characterized as 'Accented', 'Invigorating', 'Resonant', the Tuzi is labeled as 'Clacky', 'High-pitched', 'Silky'. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
50g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
60g
Bottom-out force
42g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
UPE
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Single-stage 15mm long spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
Both the Aflion Panda and the Bsun Tuzi utilize polycarbonate for their top housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The stiffness of polycarbonate contributes to a more clear and resonant sound, making it an ideal material for showcasing RGB lighting due to its translucency. The similarities in the top housing material of these two switches mean that users can expect comparable sound profiles and aesthetics when using either switch.
However, the key point of differentiation between the two switches lies in their bottom housing materials. The Panda features a nylon bottom housing, which lends itself to a deeper and fuller sound profile. The softer nature of nylon allows for more sound absorption, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when compared to the polycarbonate top housing. Conversely, the Tuzi opts for a nylon bottom housing as well, emphasizing a similar deeper and fuller sound profile that enhances the overall typing experience.
Ultimately, the combination of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing in both the Aflion Panda and Bsun Tuzi ensures a balanced sound experience for users. While the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key, the bottom housing has a more significant impact on the bottom-out sound and feel. This division of qualities between the top and bottom housings highlights the thoughtfulness in design and construction of these switches, catering to a variety of preferences in sound and typing feel.
Weight
When comparing the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it is evident that the Tuzi has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams, while the Panda requires 50 grams for actuation. In terms of bottom out force, the Tuzi again is lighter with 42 grams compared to the Panda's 60 grams. This means that the Tuzi switch provides a lighter and easier typing experience, making it ideal for those who prefer a lighter touch when typing or gaming for extended periods. On the other hand, the Panda switch offers a more substantial typing experience with a stronger push feel, which can be preferred by those who enjoy a more tactile and responsive typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches would depend on personal preference regarding the desired actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, it is evident that the Panda has a longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Tuzi's 3.6 mm. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Panda being on the slightly longer side. Gamers, who often prioritize faster response times, may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Tuzi. On the other hand, individuals who enjoy a more pronounced key press may lean towards the Panda with its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and typing experience desired.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Panda has an MSRP of $5.20 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Panda for $3.56.
The Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Tuzi (Bunny) for $3.49.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is renowned for its resonant and thocky sound profile, delivering a deep and immersive auditory experience with a clean and sharp sound. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch is known for its clacky and high-pitched sound, offering a sharp and snappy typing experience that is crisp, bright, and percussive. Both switches provide unique sound profiles that cater to different preferences, with the Panda excelling in its deep thocky echo and the Tuzi delivering a more clacky and high-pitched sound.
When it comes to feel, the Aflion Panda tactile switch is characterized as being accented and invigorating, offering a medium level of tactility that is not overwhelming but still provides a pronounced feedback and reactive feel. This creates an immersive typing sensation that is both satisfying and engaging. On the other hand, the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch is described as silky, providing an exceptionally smooth typing experience that enhances overall smoothness and minimizes resistance when pressing and releasing keys. While the Panda focuses on a tactile typing experience, the Tuzi excels in delivering a buttery smooth feel that is comfortable for long typing sessions.
Overall, the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch offer unique subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Panda provides a hyper-tactile sensation with a thocky sound profile, perfect for those who prefer a more tactile and sonorous typing experience. On the other hand, the Tuzi delivers a clacky and high-pitched sound with a silky smooth feel, catering to users who value a precise and smooth typing experience. Ultimately, selecting between these two switches will depend on individual preference for sound and feel, as both switches offer distinct qualities that can enhance the overall typing experience.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the Aflion Panda tactile switch and the Bsun Tuzi (Bunny) linear switch, you should consider your preference for tactile feedback and sound profile. If you value a hyper-tactile sensation with a deep thocky sound, the Panda switch is the way to go. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother typing experience with a clacky sound profile, the Tuzi (Bunny) switch would be more suitable for you. Ultimately, your choice should come down to whether you prioritize tactile feedback and sonorous audio feedback (Panda) or a refined typing experience with a smooth feel (Tuzi).
Mentioned in this article
