United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

PH Studio Aniya vs. KTT Pine

An in-depth look at the PH Studio Aniya and the KTT Pine switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing between the PH Studio Aniya and the KTT Pine mechanical keyboard switches, both linear switches boast unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The Aniya, with its medium-light actuation and pronounced clacky sound profile, offers a satisfying auditory experience without being overly loud. On the other hand, the KTT Pine stands out for its buttery smooth feel and low-pitched sound profile, making typing a breeze with its medium-heavy actuation. While the Aniya leans towards a more polished and resonant feel, the Pine excels in providing a creamy and bassy typing experience. Ultimately, the decision between these switches comes down to personal preference and specific needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

42g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Bottom-out force

58g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

Ly

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Single stage lengthened 20mm spring

Spring

15.5mm gold-plated spring

Housing materials

The PH Studio Aniya and KTT Pine both feature different housing materials for both the top and bottom of the switch. The Aniya utilizes POM for both the top and bottom housing, creating a deeper and relatively muted sound profile. On the other hand, the Pine incorporates polycarbonate for both the top and bottom housing, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This difference in housing materials directly affects the sound and feel of each switch, with POM contributing to a more subdued sound while polycarbonate offers a more vibrant and clear acoustics.

Although the housing materials of the Aniya and Pine switches are different, they both provide unique benefits based on their composition. POM is known for producing a pleasing and distinct sound, making it ideal for those looking for a quieter typing experience. In contrast, polycarbonate offers a more resonant and lively sound, appealing to users who prefer a sharper and crisper sound profile. The choice between POM and polycarbonate ultimately comes down to personal preference and the desired typing feel, with POM offering a softer touch and polycarbonate providing a more tactile experience.

It is important to note that the choice between POM and polycarbonate housing materials can significantly impact the overall typing experience. While POM creates a deeper and more muted sound profile, polycarbonate produces a sharper and crisper sound. The split between the bottom and top housing materials of a switch means that each component contributes differently to the overall sound and feel when typing. Ultimately, the decision between the Aniya and Pine switches boils down to individual preferences regarding sound quality, key feel, and overall typing experience.

Weight

The PH Studio Aniya linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 42 grams compared to the KTT Pine linear switch, which has an actuation force of 45 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Aniya requires 50 grams to fully press down while the Pine switch needs 58 grams, making the Aniya lighter in this aspect as well. The lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the Aniya make it ideal for users who prefer typing for longer periods or engaging in extended gaming sessions, as it requires less force to actuate and press down fully. On the other hand, the slightly heavier actuation and bottom out forces of the Pine switch provide a more substantial typing experience for users who prefer a stronger push feel. Overall, the Aniya offers a lighter typing experience while the Pine switch delivers a more medium force response.

Travel distance

The PH Studio Aniya linear switch has a travel distance of 3.2 mm, making it shorter compared to the KTT Pine linear switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Aniya offers a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, which is favored by gamers looking for fast reactions. On the other hand, the Pine switch provides a deeper key press experience with its longer travel distance, which may be preferred by those who enjoy a more pronounced tactile feel. Both switches offer unique advantages based on their travel distances, allowing users to choose based on their personal preferences for key press depth and responsiveness.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The PH Studio Aniya has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Aniya for $4.20.

The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the PH Studio Aniya linear switch has a clacky and slightly high-pitched profile, providing a crisp and sharp sound when pressed. On the other hand, the KTT Pine linear switch offers a bassier and lower-pitched sound, giving a deeper and richer tone during key presses. Both switches offer unique auditory experiences, with the Aniya leaning towards a more pronounced clacky sound, while the Pine delivers a smoother and bassier tone.

Moving on to feel, the Aniya switch is renowned for its creamy and silky typing experience, enhancing the overall smoothness of keystrokes. The use of Ly as the stem material in the Aniya switch contributes to its buttery feel, complemented by a medium-light actuation force. Similarly, the KTT Pine switch also provides a buttery and creamy typing experience, thanks to its polished, factory-lubed finish that minimizes friction for smooth key travel. Both switches aim to offer a seamless and effortless typing sensation, making each keystroke a delight for users.

In conclusion, while the PH Studio Aniya linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch offer different sound profiles and tactile experiences, they both excel in providing a smooth and enjoyable typing experience. Whether you prefer a clacky, high-pitched sound with a creamy feel or a bassy, low-pitched sound with a buttery feel, both switches cater to different preferences and ensure a satisfying typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference in sound and feel.

Conclusion

To sum up, when considering whether to choose the PH Studio Aniya linear switch or the KTT Pine linear switch, your decision should be based on your preferences for sound and feel. If you prefer a more pronounced clacky sound profile and a smooth, medium-light actuation, the Aniya switch would be a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a buttery smooth typing experience with a medium-heavy bottom out force and a polished, factory-lubed finish, the Pine switch might be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, the decision comes down to whether you prioritize sound profile or typing feel in your mechanical keyboard switches. Consider your preferences carefully to choose the switch that will provide you with the best typing experience possible.

Mentioned in this article