United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Durock Anubis vs. Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red

An in-depth look at the Durock Anubis and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboards, the switch you choose can greatly impact your typing experience. Two popular options to consider are the Durock Anubis and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red. The Anubis is a tactile switch that is best known for its deep and resonant sound profile, offering a satisfying and assertive tactile feedback with every keystroke. Its pronounced bump provides a sharp tactility that adds an extra level of intensity to your typing. On the other hand, the G Pro 3.0 Red is a linear switch from Gateron's budget-friendly G Pro line-up. It is designed to deliver a smooth typing experience with a medium-light actuation force that strikes a perfect balance between responsiveness and ease of use. Additionally, its frosted light diffuser allows for brighter and more vibrant RGB lighting effects, while its medium-high pitch offers a satisfying auditory experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond these generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your preferences and typing style.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

65g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated

Spring

20.5mm lengthened stainless steel spring

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Durock Anubis and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red differ in terms of the top housing material. The Anubis features a nylon top housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon, being a relatively softer plastic, absorbs more sound than harder plastics, creating a duller and rounder sound. In contrast, the G Pro 3.0 Red has a polycarbonate top housing. This material provides a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate contributes to a more clear and resonant sound profile. Additionally, the G Pro 3.0 Red's translucent polycarbonate top housing is especially useful for those planning to use RGB lighting, as it allows for better light diffusion.

Moving on to the bottom housing, both the Anubis and the G Pro 3.0 Red utilize nylon. Nylon is a classic switch housing material known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile. Its relatively softer nature allows for better sound absorption compared to harder plastics. Consequently, both switches will deliver a duller and rounder sound when typing due to the nylon bottom housing.

Considering the impact of the housing materials, we can observe that the bottom housing has a more significant influence on the bottom-out sound and feel when pressing down a key. This suggests that the choice of material for the bottom housing plays a crucial role in determining the overall typing experience. On the other hand, the top housing has a greater impact on the sound produced when releasing a key. Therefore, while the Durock Anubis and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red may share similarities in terms of the nylon bottom housing, the choice of top housing material sets them apart and results in distinct sound profiles for each switch.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch, there are noticeable differences. The Anubis unfortunately does not provide information on its actuation force, making it difficult to make direct comparisons in this aspect. However, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch has an actuation force of 45 grams, which suggests that it requires a relatively light touch to trigger a keystroke. On the other hand, the Anubis has a bottom out force of 65 grams, indicating that it provides a medium-heavy resistance when pressed all the way down.

In terms of weight, the G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch seems to be the lighter option. This lighter actuation force can be beneficial for those who prefer typing or gaming for extended periods, as it may reduce fatigue and strain on their fingers. Additionally, a lighter actuation force can offer a quicker and more responsive typing experience.

However, for individuals who prefer a stronger push feel and a more substantial typing experience, the Anubis may be a better option. Its heavier bottom out force of 65 grams can provide a satisfying tactile feedback and a sense of solidity during typing or gaming sessions.

Although the specific actuation force of the Anubis is unknown, if it happens to be similar to the G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch, users can expect similar results in terms of the force required to trigger a keystroke. This can be advantageous for those who prefer consistency or who may want to switch between different keyboards without experiencing a significant difference in the typing experience.

Ultimately, the choice between the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch depends on personal preferences. Those who prioritize a lighter typing experience may lean towards the G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch, while individuals seeking a stronger push feel may gravitate towards the Anubis.

Travel distance

The Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch have the same travel distance of 4 mm. This means that both switches will provide a similar tactile experience when pressed, allowing users to feel the key being pressed down to the same extent. In terms of travel distance, neither switch is shorter or longer than the other as they offer the same distance for key travel. Therefore, if one is looking for a consistent tactile feel and key travel distance, both the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch would provide similar results.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red has an MSRP of $2.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Red for $2.77.

The Durock Anubis comes in at $8.00 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, both the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch have a similar neutral sound profile. A neutral switch typically has a moderate actuation force requirement and a moderate sound profile, making it suitable for various purposes. However, it's important to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by other factors such as the type of board and keycaps used. Therefore, while the sound of these switches is described as neutral, the overall sound experience may vary based on additional elements.

Moving on to feel, the Anubis offers an accented and polished tactile experience. Accented switches can be described as providing a medium amount of tactility that is neither overwhelming nor subtle. Combined with the polished finish, the Anubis switch offers reduced friction and smooth key travel, resulting in a sleek and refined typing experience. On the other hand, the G Pro 3.0 Red switch is described as creamy, mild, polished, and silky. This indicates that it provides a smooth and buttery typing experience, with a gentle and approachable feel. Similarly to the Anubis, the G Pro 3.0 Red switch also offers reduced friction and smooth key travel.

Considering all the available information, both the Durock Anubis tactile switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch have their own unique qualities. The Anubis switch excels in providing a sharp and intense tactile feedback with a deep and resonant sound profile. Its accented and polished feel enhances the typing experience by providing a medium amount of tactility and reduced friction. The G Pro 3.0 Red switch, on the other hand, offers a smooth and budget-friendly linear option with a medium-light actuation force. Its creamy, mild, polished, and silky feel creates a silky and effortless typing sensation. While the sound profiles are described as neutral for both switches, it's important to consider other factors such as the keyboard and keycaps used, as they influence the overall sound experience. Ultimately, whether you choose the Anubis or the G Pro 3.0 Red switch, you can expect satisfying and enjoyable typing experiences.

Conclusion

In closing, if you prefer a more intense and assertive typing experience with a sharp tactility, the Durock Anubis tactile switch would be an excellent choice for you. With its medium-heavy bottom out force of 65 grams and pronounced bump, it offers a deep and resonant sound profile that adds a new level of intensity to every keystroke. On the other hand, if you prioritize a smoother and more budget-friendly option, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch is a great option. With a light bottom out force of 50 grams and a medium-light actuation force, it strikes a balance between responsiveness and ease of use. Additionally, its frosted light diffuser allows for brighter and more vibrant RGB lighting effects, while its medium-high pitch provides a satisfying auditory experience. Ultimately, the choice between the Durock Anubis and Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red will depend on your personal preferences for tactile feedback and typing experience.

Mentioned in this article