Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 offer unique experiences for users. The Baby Kangaroo is a tactile switch, providing a satisfying click and a vibrant sound profile, with descriptors like 'Bouncy' and 'Snappy' capturing its essence. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 is a linear switch, offering a smooth and consistent keystroke without any tactile feedback. While the Baby Kangaroo is praised for its tactile experience, the Lotus V2 is known for its simplicity and reliability. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
59g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm double-stage gold-plated
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) features a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharper and crisper sound profile compared to the Lotus V2's POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound. The use of polycarbonate in the top housing of the Baby Kangaroo (V2) also allows for a clearer and more resonant sound, making it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the POM top housing of the Lotus V2 provides a unique and pleasing sound experience that leans towards the deeper end of the spectrum.
In terms of the bottom housing, the Baby Kangaroo (V2) utilizes a nylon material that offers a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition that absorbs more sound. This creates a duller and rounder sound compared to the POM bottom housing of the Lotus V2, which also contributes to a deep and muted sound experience. Both switches provide a unique sound quality through their choice of materials, with the nylon bottom housing of the Baby Kangaroo (V2) highlighting a more absorbent and full-bodied sound compared to the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing.
Overall, while both switches offer distinct sound profiles based on their housing materials, the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) features a combination of polycarbonate and nylon for a sharper, crisper, and fuller sound experience. In contrast, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 utilizes POM for both top and bottom housings, resulting in a unique and pleasing sound that leans towards the deeper end of the spectrum. Despite their differences, both switches provide a satisfying typing experience with their respective housing materials enhancing the overall sound profile.
Weight
In comparing the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) tactile switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, it is clear that the actuation force and bottom out force play a significant role in determining the typing experience. The Baby Kangaroo (V2) has a higher actuation force of 59 grams compared to the Lotus V2's 45 grams, making it a heavier option. Additionally, the Baby Kangaroo (V2) also has a higher bottom out force of 67 grams, providing a more substantial typing experience compared to the Lotus V2, which has an unknown bottom out force. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Lotus V2 with its lower actuation force, while those seeking a more robust feel may opt for the Baby Kangaroo (V2). Ultimately, the weight of the switches can impact typing comfort and efficiency, so users should consider their preferences before making a choice.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) tactile switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is the same, with both having a travel distance of 3.4 mm. When comparing these two switches, it is clear that they will provide a similar typing experience in terms of the distance the switch travels from the top to the bottom. The tactile feedback of the Baby Kangaroo and the smooth linear feel of the Lotus V2 will offer a different typing experience, but in terms of travel distance, they both offer the same level of keypress depth. Overall, both switches will provide a consistent and satisfying typing experience despite their different switch characteristics.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Baby Kangaroo (V2) for $5.50.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) tactile switch is characterized as having a clacky, marbly, high-pitched, and resonant sound profile. When pressed, these switches produce a sharp and snappy sound with a clean, bright, and percussive quality. The sound is high-pitched and resonant, offering an immersive auditory experience during typing sessions. On the other hand, there is no specific information available regarding the sound profile of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch. However, it is essential to note that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard's construction and the choice of keycaps.
Moving on to the feel, the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) tactile switch is known for being snappy, bouncy, and polished. These switches are super responsive and provide a spring-like or elastic feedback sensation, making typing feel more lively and dynamic. The keys have a polished finish, resulting in a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. Conversely, there is no specific information available regarding the feel of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch.
Taking all available information into consideration, the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) tactile switch offers a unique blend of tactile feedback and a crisp, marbly sound profile, along with a snappy and polished feel. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch lacks specific details on both sound and feel. If you are looking for a switch that provides a distinct tactile experience with a crisp sound and responsive feel, the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) may be the ideal choice for you. However, keep in mind that personal preferences, typing style, and other factors will ultimately determine which switch is the best fit for your needs.
Conclusion
To sum up, when choosing between the Gateron Baby Kangaroo (V2) tactile switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, consider the characteristics that are most important to you. If you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force and enjoy a tactile typing experience with a crisp, light tactility and a recognizable clacky, marbly sound profile, then the Baby Kangaroo (V2) may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a switch with no specified bottom out force and are looking for a linear typing experience with a smooth key travel and refined finish, the Lotus V2 may be more suitable for your preferences. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to your personal typing style and sound preferences, so choose the one that aligns best with your needs and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
