United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Sarokeys BCP vs. KTT Lightning

An in-depth look at the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Lightning switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Lightning mechanical keyboard switches, it's clear that both offer unique experiences for users. The BCP from Sarokeys provides a creamy and bouncy typing sensation with a signature poppy and clacky sound profile, making it a great choice for those who enjoy a tactile and satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Lightning is known for its speed and efficiency, perfect for situations where fast response times are crucial. With a slick feel and a clacky sound profile, the Lightning switches offer a more polished and subtle typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

51g

Actuation force

43g

Bottom-out force

57g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

1.30 mm

Pre-travel

1.00 mm

Total travel

3.20 mm

Total travel

3.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Spring

Single-staged 20mm lengthened spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The Sarokeys BCP and KTT Lightning both utilize nylon for their bottom housing, which results in a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing. This is because nylon's softer nature allows it to absorb more sound, creating a duller and rounder sound compared to harder plastics. However, the BCP uses nylon not only for the bottom housing but also for the top housing, while the Lightning features a polycarbonate top housing. The polycarbonate top housing of the Lightning creates a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffer nature, enhancing the overall typing experience.

In terms of aesthetics, the KTT Lightning stands out with its polycarbonate top housing, which is clear and allows for RGB lighting to shine through. This makes the switch visually appealing and offers customization options with different lighting effects. On the other hand, the Sarokeys BCP's all-nylon construction may appeal to those looking for a more classic look and feel without the need for RGB lighting. Despite their differences in top housing material, both switches offer a similar typing experience with their nylon bottom housing, providing a deep and full sound profile that is ideal for typists who enjoy a quieter typing experience.

Overall, the choice between the Sarokeys BCP and KTT Lightning ultimately comes down to personal preference in terms of sound profile and aesthetics. The BCP's all-nylon construction offers a classic typing experience with a deeper sound profile, while the Lightning's combination of nylon and polycarbonate provides a sharper and crisper sound, along with the added visual appeal of RGB lighting. Both switches showcase the unique qualities that different housing materials can bring to a typing experience, allowing users to tailor their keyboard to their preferences.

Weight

The actuation force and bottom out force of the Sarokeys BCP linear switch and the KTT Lightning linear switch differ in terms of weight. The BCP switch has a slightly heavier actuation force of 51 grams and a bottom out force of 57 grams, providing a medium-light typing experience. On the other hand, the Lightning switch has a lighter actuation force of 43 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams, making it a lighter option. In terms of weight preference, those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the Lightning switch for longer typing or gaming sessions, while those who prefer a more substantial typing experience may opt for the BCP switch. Overall, the actuation and bottom out forces of both switches offer a unique typing experience, catering to different preferences in typing feel.

Travel distance

The travel distance of the Sarokeys BCP linear switch is 3.2 mm, while the KTT Lightning linear switch has a travel distance of 3 mm. In this case, the Lightning switch has a shorter travel distance compared to the BCP switch. The difference may seem insignificant, but for those who prioritize speed and quick response times, the Lightning switch may be the preferred choice. On the other hand, individuals who prefer a more substantial key press and a deeper feel may opt for the BCP switch with its slightly longer travel distance. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, making them suitable for those who value swift keystrokes. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and the specific needs of the user.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Sarokeys BCP has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the BCP for $4.85.

The KTT Lightning comes in at $3.41 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, both the Sarokeys BCP and the KTT Lightning switches are described as having a clacky sound profile. This means that when pressed, they produce a sharp, snappy, and crisp sound that can be bright and percussive. While the BCP offers a poppy and clacky sound, the Lightning adds a high-pitched element to its sound profile, along with a chirpy quality that adds a unique acoustic signature. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch is also influenced by factors like the keyboard, keycaps, and typing technique.

Moving on to feel, the Sarokeys BCP switch is known for providing a bouncy and creamy typing experience. The bouncy sensation offers a spring-like and elastic feedback when pressed, giving a lively feel with rebound. The creamy feel adds a smooth and buttery sensation to typing, making each keystroke feel silky and effortless. On the other hand, the KTT Lightning switch is described as having a subtle resistance and a polished finish. The subtle resistance offers a gentle feel that is not overly light but still maintains a light typing experience, suitable for shared spaces. The polished finish results in smooth and refined key travel, with reduced friction for a sleek typing feel.

In conclusion, both the Sarokeys BCP and KTT Lightning switches share certain qualities like a clacky sound profile. However, the BCP provides a bouncy and creamy feel, while the Lightning offers a subtle resistance and a polished finish. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on personal preference for sound, feel, and typing experience. Experimenting with different switches on various keyboards can help you find the perfect match for your preferences and typing style.

Conclusion

In closing, when choosing between the Sarokeys BCP linear switch and the KTT Lightning linear switch, consider your preferences and needs. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force with a creamy and bouncy feel, accompanied by a signature poppy and clacky sound, the Sarokeys BCP may be the best option for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a light bottom out force switch with a slick feel and a clacky sound profile that is also suited for competitive gaming due to its speed, then the KTT Lightning may be the more suitable choice. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will come down to your personal typing preferences and intended usage.

Mentioned in this article