United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Aflion Blue Sky vs. Wuque Studio WS POM+

An in-depth look at the Aflion Blue Sky and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch that meets your typing preferences, the Aflion Blue Sky and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ stand out as exceptional linear options, each offering unique characteristics that cater to different needs. The Aflion Blue Sky is renowned for its long pole stem, providing a crystal clear linear typing experience complemented by a high-pitched, sparkling sound profile and a remarkably smooth push feel, making it an excellent choice for those who prioritize tactile feedback and sound. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS POM+ distinguishes itself with its all-POM composition, delivering a deep and satisfying "thock" sound signature accompanied by a buttery-smooth keystroke that appeals to users who value a rich auditory experience alongside a seamless typing action. Both switches offer their own merits, with the Blue Sky catering to those seeking a more vibrant tactile sensation, while the WS POM+ caters to those who appreciate a deeper, more resonant sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

55g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

15mm spring

Spring

22mm extended double-stage spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Aflion Blue Sky and the Wuque Studio WS POM+, distinct differences emerge in their choice of materials, which contribute uniquely to their sound profiles. The Blue Sky features a polycarbonate top housing, known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound. Polycarbonate's stiffness enhances its resonance capabilities, making it particularly effective for clear and bright sound characteristics. In contrast, the WS POM+ employs a POM top housing, which lends itself to a deeper and more muted sound profile. While polycarbonate and POM may serve similar functions as housing materials, their differing physical properties result in distinct auditory experiences that can appeal to different preferences among users.

The bottom housings of the two switches present another interesting point of comparison. The Blue Sky utilizes a nylon bottom housing, revered for its classic qualities that yield a deeper, fuller sound profile. Nylon’s softer nature allows it to absorb sound, further contributing to a rounder and more muted auditory experience. In contrast, the WS POM+ also incorporates a POM bottom housing, which, similar to the POM top, emphasizes a deeper tone and muted sound. Despite both switches utilizing POM for the top housing of the WS POM+ and the nylon for the Blue Sky’s bottom housing, the overall characteristics imparted by these materials lead to differing tactile and auditory outcomes during use.

When using these switches, the discrepancies in material compositions affect both the sound and feel experienced by the user. The polycarbonate's sharper sound in the Blue Sky contrasts with the muted tones of the POM in the WS POM+, but one may achieve similar results by carefully choosing typing techniques and usage contexts. Since the bottom housing's attributes significantly influence the bottom-out sound and feel, associations may be drawn between the deeper sound profile of the WS POM+ and the fuller sound created by the nylon bottom housing of the Blue Sky. Ultimately, the individual appeal of each switch rests in its blend of material qualities, resulting in unique auditory and tactile experiences that cater to different preferences.

Weight

When comparing the Aflion Blue Sky linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, we see notable differences in both actuation and bottom out forces. The Blue Sky requires an actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, classifying it as a medium force switch. In contrast, the WS POM+ has a lighter actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 55 grams, placing it in the medium-light category. Consequently, the WS POM+ is the lighter option between the two, making it more suitable for prolonged typing sessions or for users who prefer less resistance. This lighter actuation force may appeal to those who value speed and endurance, while the heavier Blue Sky offers a more substantial feel, catering to users who appreciate a stronger pushback during their typing experience. Overall, the differences in force between these two switches suggest that the choice depends on individual preferences for tactile feedback and typing comfort.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the Aflion Blue Sky linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, a distinct difference emerges. The Aflion Blue Sky features a travel distance of 4.0 mm, which aligns with the traditional preference for deeper key presses, offering a more robust tactile experience. In contrast, the WS POM+ has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm, which may appeal to gamers seeking quicker response times from their switches. Consequently, if you lean toward more substantial keystrokes for a satisfying typing experience, the Aflion Blue Sky is the superior choice. Conversely, for those who favor swift, responsive actions, the WS POM+ provides an edge due to its reduced travel distance. Thus, in this comparison, the Blue Sky's longer travel distance of 4.0 mm is a preference for depth, while the WS POM+'s 3.6 mm caters to those desiring a more immediate feedback.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Aflion Blue Sky has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Blue Sky for $4.07.

The Wuque Studio WS POM+ comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Aflion Blue Sky linear switch is known for its high-pitched sound profile, producing a sharp and crisp sound when pressed, complemented by a neutral quality that makes it versatile for various environments. This characteristic makes it suitable for both home and work settings, catering to users who prefer a cleaner auditory experience without the richer and bassier tones found in other switches. Meanwhile, the sound qualities of the Wuque Studio WS POM+ are not explicitly detailed, leaving its auditory experience open to interpretation. However, it is important to note that sound perception can vary based on the keyboard setup, including the type of board and keycaps used.

When it comes to feel, the Aflion Blue Sky switches offer a mild typing experience that is approachable for most users. The polished nature of the Blue Sky switch ensures a smooth and refined keystroke, allowing for reduced friction during key travel, enhancing the overall typing experience. The WS POM+ also emphasizes a buttery-smooth keystroke, which suggests a refined tactile experience, but lacks specific descriptors, making direct comparison challenging. Users can likely expect a smooth feel from both switches, though the nuances of the WS POM+ remain unspecified.

In summary, the Aflion Blue Sky linear switch delivers a high-pitched and neutral sound profile, alongside a mild and polished feel, making it an excellent choice for those who prefer a clean and refined typing experience. The WS POM+, while offering a deep "thock" sound signature and a smooth keystroke, does not provide explicit details on sound and feel descriptors. Both switches promise a smooth typing experience, but the subjective qualities of the WS POM+ require further exploration to fully appreciate its unique attributes. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your preference for sound and feel nuances, and either switch may provide satisfying results based on your setup.

Conclusion

To sum up, choosing between the Aflion Blue Sky linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch largely depends on your personal preferences for tactile feedback, sound profile, and intended use. If you prefer a more pronounced and slightly heavier feel, the Blue Sky switch, with its 60 grams of bottom-out force, offers a smooth and crystal-clear typing experience, making it an excellent choice for gamers or typists who enjoy a high-pitched sound and consistent keystroke feedback. These switches are particularly fantastic if you enjoy a "pop" when you type and favor a polished feel that minimizes friction. On the other hand, if you gravitate towards a softer, more muted experience, the WS POM+ switch, with its medium-light 55 grams of bottom-out force, provides a deep "thock" sound that many find satisfying for both work and leisure. Its buttery-smooth keystroke is ideal for those who prefer a more grounded typing experience that doesn’t wear on the fingers during lengthy typing sessions. Ultimately, your choice should align with whether you prioritize a pronounced auditory feedback and a polished feel with the Blue Sky, or a smooth, thocky typing sensation with the WS POM+. Select the switch that most closely matches your typing style and environment for the best experience.

Mentioned in this article