HMX Blue Topaz vs. KTT Laurel
An in-depth look at the HMX Blue Topaz and the KTT Laurel switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the HMX Blue Topaz and the KTT Laurel both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Blue Topaz, a linear switch, stands out for its incredibly smooth actuation and lightweight feel, providing a seamless typing experience accompanied by a visually captivating glittery housing and a clacky sound signature. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel, also a linear switch, boasts a medium-light design with a full POM housing, short travel, and long pole design, striking a balance between responsiveness and comfort while producing a subtly low-pitched sound profile. While the Blue Topaz is ideal for those seeking an easy-to-press and clacky typing experience, the Laurel caters to users who prefer a low-pitched and snappy feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
43g
Bottom-out force
48g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
3.90 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22m spring
Housing materials
The HMX Blue Topaz and KTT Laurel both offer unique housing materials for their switches, with the Blue Topaz featuring a polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing, while the Laurel utilizes a POM top housing and POM bottom housing. While both switches have different top housing materials, they both share a POM bottom housing, resulting in a similar sound profile for the bottom-out sound. The Blue Topaz's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and crisper sound profile, ideal for those looking for a clear and resonant typing experience. On the other hand, the Laurel's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound, providing a different auditory experience for users.
In terms of aesthetics, the Blue Topaz's polycarbonate top housing offers translucency, making it suitable for use with RGB lighting setups. This can add a visually appealing element to the switch, enhancing the overall look of the keyboard. In contrast, the Laurel's POM top housing may not offer the same level of transparency, but it still provides a unique and pleasing sound that caters to users who prefer a deeper tone. The choice between the two housing materials ultimately comes down to personal preference, whether you prioritize a sharper sound profile like the Blue Topaz or a deeper sound profile like the Laurel.
When considering the impact of the housing materials on the typing experience, it's important to note that the bottom housing plays a significant role in the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing influences the sound when releasing a key. This means that the combination of housing materials in each switch will affect how the typing experience feels and sounds overall. Whether you prefer the stiffer and crisper sound of the Blue Topaz's polycarbonate top housing or the deeper and more muted sound of the Laurel's POM top housing, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences in keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
The HMX Blue Topaz linear switch has a lighter actuation force of 40 grams compared to the KTT Laurel linear switch, which has an actuation force of 43 grams. Similarly, the bottom out force of the Blue Topaz is lighter at 48 grams, while the Laurel has a slightly heavier bottom out force of 50 grams. Both switches offer a relatively light typing experience, making them suitable for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. However, for those who prefer a more substantial typing feel, the Laurel may provide a slightly firmer keystroke due to its slightly heavier actuation and bottom out forces. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches comes down to personal preference for typing experience and the desired level of key responsiveness.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the HMX Blue Topaz linear switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch, we see that the Blue Topaz has a travel distance of 3.9 mm, while the Laurel has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that the Blue Topaz has a slightly longer travel distance than the Laurel. The 0.4 mm difference may not seem significant, but for some users, it can affect the typing experience. The Blue Topaz may provide a more deliberate feeling when typing due to the longer travel distance, while the Laurel may feel snappier and more responsive with its shorter travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference, with those looking for more depth opting for the Blue Topaz and those seeking a quicker response choosing the Laurel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Blue Topaz has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Blue Topaz for $3.49.
The KTT Laurel has an MSRP of $4.42 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Laurel for $3.95.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
Overall, the HMX Blue Topaz linear switch offers a more clacky sound profile, providing a sharp and snappy auditory experience that many users find satisfying. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel linear switch produces a subtly low-pitched sound, offering a more mellow and bass-heavy tone that appeals to those looking for a quieter typing experience. In terms of feel, the Blue Topaz is known for its easy-to-press actuation and lightweight feel, making typing effortless and reducing finger fatigue. In contrast, the KTT Laurel switch is described as snappy, providing a super responsive typing experience that feels more alive.
When comparing the two switches, users can expect different sound and feel characteristics that cater to their personal preferences. If a user prefers a clacky sound and easy-to-press feel, the HMX Blue Topaz linear switch would be the ideal choice. On the other hand, if a user prefers a low-pitched sound and a snappier typing experience, the KTT Laurel linear switch would be more suitable. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance the overall typing experience, providing users with a variety of options to suit their individual needs and preferences.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when it comes to choosing between the HMX Blue Topaz linear switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch, it ultimately depends on your personal preferences. If you prefer a super smooth and lightweight feel with a clacky sound signature, the Blue Topaz is the way to go. On the other hand, if you're looking for a medium-light switch with a balance of responsiveness and comfort, along with a subtly low-pitched sound profile, then the Laurel may be more suited to your typing style. Consider the sound and feel descriptions provided for each switch to determine which one aligns best with your typing preferences and needs. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance your overall typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
