United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Akko Botany vs. Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile

An in-depth look at the Akko Botany and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the Akko Botany and Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile stand out with their distinct characteristics and benefits. The Akko Botany switches are celebrated for their lively clacky sound, making them a delightful choice for typists who appreciate auditory feedback and the satisfaction of each keystroke. With their linear design, they offer a smooth typing experience free from any tactile resistance, ideal for those who prefer uninterrupted key presses during long typing sessions or gaming marathons. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile switches strike a balance between smoothness and feedback, boasting a noticeable tactile bump that enhances the typing experience without overwhelming the user. This makes them particularly appealing for individuals who enjoy a richer sensory experience while maintaining a neutral sound profile, ensuring a less disruptive environment. Ultimately, whether you lean towards the engaging sound of the Botany switches or the refined feel of the WS Light Tactile, both options cater to specific preferences in the mechanical keyboard landscape. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits your needs.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

38g

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

50g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

Nylon Pro

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Nylon

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel spring

Spring

15.4mm single-staged spring

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Akko Botany and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile, the most notable difference lies in their top housing compositions. The Akko Botany features a nylon top housing, which is associated with creating a deeper and fuller sound profile. This is attributed to nylon's softer nature, which allows it to absorb sound more effectively compared to harder plastics. The result is a typing experience that yields a rounder and more muted auditory feedback, enhancing the tactile feel of each keystroke. In contrast, the WS Light Tactile utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which delivers a distinctly sharper and higher-pitched sound profile. Polycarbonate's stiffer structure contributes to a clearer and more resonant sound, providing a different auditory experience, especially noticeable in the context of RGB lighting where its translucency can showcase vibrant colors.

On the other hand, both the Akko Botany and Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile share a common element in their bottom housings, as both switches feature nylon. Using nylon in the bottom housing for both switches reinforces the deeper and fuller sound characteristic attributed to this material. Given that the bottom housing plays a significant role in the bottom-out feel and sound of a key press, users can expect a similar tactile experience when bottoming out, regardless of the differences found in the top housing. This unifying detail of using nylon creates a consistency in the tactile feedback that may resonate well with users preferring a rounder emotional response from their typing experience.

Ultimately, the combination of nylon in the bottom housing and contrasting top housing materials leads to a unique interplay in sound and feel. While the Akko Botany offers a cohesive deep sound profile from both its nylon top and bottom, the WS Light Tactile introduces a dichotomy with its polycarbonate top and nylon bottom, resulting in a clearer sound on release combined with the satisfying depth when pressed down. Depending on personal preference, a typist may gravitate towards either the Akko Botany for a plush, enveloping experience or the WS Light Tactile for a vibrant, sharp engagement while still enjoying the consistent tactile foundation provided by the nylon bottom housing.

Weight

When comparing the Akko Botany linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch, notable differences in actuation and bottom out forces emerge. The Botany switch has a lighter actuation force of 38 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, while the WS Light Tactile requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. This means that the Botany switch is more suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch, making it ideal for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. Conversely, the WS Light Tactile is designed for those who appreciate a more substantial push feel, providing a heavier typing experience. While both switches are classified as light, the Botany's lighter forces may allow for quicker and less fatiguing keystrokes compared to the WS Light Tactile, making them distinctly appealing to different preferences in tactile feedback and effort required for key presses.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Akko Botany linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch, it is evident that the two differ in their design intent and user experience. The Botany features a travel distance of 3.6 mm, making it a shorter option that caters to those who prioritize quick responsiveness—ideal for gamers seeking faster actuation. In contrast, the WS Light Tactile has a slightly longer travel distance of 4.0 mm, aligning more closely with traditional preferences for deeper keystrokes, which some users may find more satisfying and less abrupt. Therefore, while the Botany offers a quicker response, the WS Light Tactile provides a more substantial tactile experience. If you prefer a snappier feel, the shorter travel distance of the Botany would be the better choice, whereas if you enjoy a more tactile depth, the longer travel distance of the WS Light Tactile may be more suitable.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Akko Botany has an MSRP of $3.89 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Botany for $3.11.

The Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile comes in at $4.20 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The Akko Botany switches produce a distinct and vibrant clacky sound that many users find engaging and enjoyable, providing an auditory feedback that can enhance the overall typing experience. This lively sound profile is particularly appealing for those who appreciate the acoustic dimension of keyboard interactions, making it an excellent choice for a wide range of environments. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switches offer a more neutral sound signature, characterized by moderate sound levels. This neutrality allows them to seamlessly fit into various settings—whether at home or in an office—without being intrusive, appealing to users who favor a subtler auditory experience while still valuing the essential feedback of keystrokes.

When it comes to feel, the Botany switches provide a smooth typing experience, though the specific tactile characteristics are less defined. In contrast, the WS Light Tactile switches feature a stepped design that provides users with a tactile bump, making the actuation point easily distinguishable. This design contributes to a gentle and comfortable typing experience, requiring minimal effort to press the keys while still offering a sense of satisfaction during use. The light actuation force allows for prolonged typing sessions without causing finger fatigue, enhancing overall productivity and comfort.

In summary, while the Akko Botany switches are characterized by their lively and clacky sound, making them fun for those who appreciate a pronounced auditory feedback, the WS Light Tactile switches provide a more neutral sound and a distinct tactile feel with their stepped design. Both switches present unique advantages, catering to different preferences in sound and tactile feedback. Choosing between them will ultimately depend on your desired typing experience—whether you prefer the lively sound and smooth feel of the Botany or the more subtle, yet tactile, experience of the WS Light Tactile.

Conclusion

To conclude, when deciding between the Akko Botany linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch, consider your personal preferences and typing needs. If you are looking for a switch that offers a lighter feel with a lively, clacky sound straight out of the box, the Botany switch would be an excellent choice for you. Its 45-gram bottom out force makes it suitable for those who appreciate a smooth linear typing experience without the tactile feedback. On the other hand, if you prefer a bit of tactile feedback while still maintaining a smooth keystroke, the WS Light Tactile switch is ideal. With a slightly higher actuation force of 50 grams, it provides a pleasant tactile bump that is easy to press, making it perfect for both casual typing and longer work sessions. Additionally, its neutral sound profile makes it versatile enough to fit into various environments, whether at home or in an office setting. Ultimately, your choice should reflect whether you lean more towards a lively linear experience or a tactile feedback in your typing journey.

Mentioned in this article