Gateron Box CJ vs. Cherry MX Speed Silver
An in-depth look at the Gateron Box CJ and the Cherry MX Speed Silver switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron Box CJ and Cherry MX Speed Silver both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Gateron Box CJ is renowned for its marriage of CJ lineage attributes with the swift characteristics of speed switches, providing typists with rapid response and higher-pitched clacks. Its smooth push feel makes typing a breeze, and the option to customize lubrication allows enthusiasts to tailor the switch to their exacting standards. In contrast, the Cherry MX Speed Silver stands out for its linear action, low spring resistance, and full height design, making it perfect for gamers seeking maximum speed and instant triggering. Each switch has its own strengths and qualities that appeal to different users; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
57g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.20 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
15.4mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron Box CJ and the Cherry MX Speed Silver, it is clear that both switches have nylon bottom housings. This means that when typing on either switch, users can expect a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon. The differences in sound between the two switches will likely come from their respective top housings. The Box CJ features a polycarbonate top housing, which is described as creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, while the MX Speed Silver's nylon top housing will produce a deeper and fuller sound.
One important distinction between the Box CJ and the MX Speed Silver is their top housing materials. The polycarbonate top housing of the Box CJ is known for its stiffness and ability to create a clear and resonant sound profile. This results in a more sharp and high-pitched sound compared to the MX Speed Silver's nylon top housing, which absorbs more sound and produces a duller and rounder sound. While both switches have nylon bottom housings, the choice of top housing material will significantly impact the overall sound and feel of typing on these switches.
Overall, the housing materials of the Gateron Box CJ and the Cherry MX Speed Silver play a crucial role in determining the sound profile and typing experience of each switch. The choice between a polycarbonate top housing for a sharper sound or a nylon top housing for a fuller sound will come down to personal preference. However, both switches share the common feature of nylon bottom housings, which contribute to a deeper and fuller sound profile. Ultimately, whether using the Box CJ or the MX Speed Silver, users can expect a unique typing experience based on the combination of top and bottom housing materials in each switch.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch, it is clear that the MX Speed Silver is the lighter of the two switches. The MX Speed Silver has an actuation force of 30 grams, making it a lighter touch compared to the Box CJ's 45 grams. Additionally, the Box CJ has a bottom out force of 57 grams, while the bottom out force of the MX Speed Silver is unknown. Both switches provide a different typing experience due to the varying actuation and bottom out forces. Some users may prefer the lighter actuation force of the MX Speed Silver for extended typing sessions, while others may opt for the heavier actuation force of the Box CJ for a more substantial typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing force and feedback.
Travel distance
The Gateron Box CJ linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm, which is considered a traditional distance. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch has a shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm, making it a more popular choice among gamers for its faster response times. For those who prefer a shallower key press, the MX Speed Silver would be the ideal choice. However, if you prefer a deeper key press that feels more substantial, the Gateron Box CJ with its longer travel distance may be more suitable. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches comes down to personal preference and the type of typing experience you are looking for.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron Box CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Box CJ for $5.35.
The Cherry MX Speed Silver has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Speed Silver for $4.00.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Gateron Box CJ linear switch is best described as clacky, offering a sharp and snappy sound when pressed. The Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch, on the other hand, is known for its thocky sound, producing a deep and satisfying tone. Depending on personal preference, the Box CJ may be preferred for its brighter and more percussive sound, while the MX Speed Silver may appeal to those seeking a deeper and more resonant acoustic experience.
When it comes to feel, the Gateron Box CJ offers an impossibly smooth push feel that glides effortlessly, providing a mild typing experience that is approachable to most users. In contrast, the Cherry MX Speed Silver is noted for its low spring resistance and instant triggering, with some users finding it textured or scratchy upon actuation. Those who prioritize a smooth typing experience may lean towards the Box CJ, while gamers looking for rapid response times may prefer the tactile feedback of the MX Speed Silver.
Overall, both switches have their own unique qualities that cater to different preferences and needs. While the Gateron Box CJ excels in providing a smooth and clacky typing experience, the Cherry MX Speed Silver stands out for its rapid response and thocky sound. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and typing style. However, both switches offer high-quality performance and are sure to provide a satisfying typing experience for their respective users.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Cherry MX Speed Silver linear switch, you should consider your priorities. If you are looking for a switch that combines the swift characteristics of speed switches with the smooth push feel, higher-pitched clacks, and customizable lubrication options, the Box CJ may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prioritize rapid response, low spring resistance, and an essential tool for gaming where milliseconds count, the MX Speed Silver might be more suitable. Ultimately, your decision should depend on whether you value the unique attributes and customization options of the Box CJ or the rapid response and full height design of the MX Speed Silver.
Mentioned in this article
