Gateron Box CJ vs. HC Studio Roselle
An in-depth look at the Gateron Box CJ and the HC Studio Roselle switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gateron Box CJ and the HC Studio Roselle mechanical keyboard switches, it becomes evident that both offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The Box CJ is renowned for its swift characteristics and higher-pitched clacks, making it ideal for those seeking rapid response and a smoother push feel. On the other hand, the Roselle stands out for its inherent smoothness and low-pitched sound signature, providing a frictionless typing experience. While the Box CJ is categorized as 'Clacky', 'Mild', 'Neutral', and 'Chirpy', the Roselle is categorized as 'Bassy', 'Frictionless', 'Low-pitched', 'Mild', and 'Neutral'. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will come down to personal preference and usage requirements; however, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
57g
Bottom-out force
52g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
Y3
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
15.4mm single-stage spring
Spring
20.5mm lengthened single-staged spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron Box CJ and the HC Studio Roselle, we can see that the Box CJ utilizes polycarbonate for the top housing while the Roselle uses POM. Polycarbonate produces a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile due to its stiffness, making it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. On the other hand, POM creates a deeper and more muted sound profile, providing a different typing experience for users. Both materials have their own unique qualities that contribute to the overall sound and feel of the switch.
Moving on to the bottom housing, the Box CJ features a nylon bottom housing while the Roselle has a POM bottom housing. Nylon is known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile, thanks to its softer plastic composition that absorbs more sound. This creates a duller and rounder sound compared to the sharper sound of polycarbonate. Similarly, POM in the Roselle's bottom housing also contributes to a deeper and more muted sound profile, aligning with the overall typing experience offered by the Roselle switch.
Overall, the top and bottom housing materials play a crucial role in determining the sound and feel of a switch. While the Box CJ and Roselle switches utilize different materials for their top and bottom housings, they both aim to provide a unique and enjoyable typing experience for users. Whether it's the sharp and crisp sound of polycarbonate or the deep and muted sound of POM, both switches offer distinct qualities that cater to different preferences among mechanical keyboard enthusiasts.
Weight
The Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the HC Studio Roselle linear switch both have a similar actuation force of 45 grams. However, the Box CJ has a higher bottom out force of 57 grams compared to the Roselle's 52 grams. This means that the Box CJ will provide a slightly heavier typing experience when fully pressed. In terms of weight, both switches fall into the medium-light category, making them suitable for those who prefer a lighter typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on whether the user prefers a slightly heavier bottom out force for a more substantial typing experience or a lighter touch for longer typing sessions.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the HC Studio Roselle linear switch, it is clear that the Roselle has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm compared to the 4 mm travel distance of the Box CJ. The shorter travel distance of the Roselle may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the Box CJ may provide a more satisfying depth for those who prefer a longer travel distance. Both switches fall within the traditional range of travel distances, with the Roselle being on the shallower end and the Box CJ being slightly longer. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to individual preference for travel distance and desired level of responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron Box CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Box CJ for $5.35.
The HC Studio Roselle has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Roselle for $4.70.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gateron Box CJ offers a clacky typing experience with sharp and snappy sounds, providing a percussive feel to each keystroke. On the other hand, the HC Studio Roselle produces a low-pitched sound profile with a bass-heavy and mellow tone, creating a deeper and richer auditory experience. Depending on personal preference, the Box CJ leans towards a brighter and more intense sound, while the Roselle offers a more subdued and soothing typing acoustics.
In terms of feel, the Gateron Box CJ provides an impossibly smooth push feel that glides effortlessly, offering a mild tactile experience that falls within a safe, middle-ground zone. Conversely, the HC Studio Roselle is described as frictionless, delivering an extremely smooth and effortless typing experience with minimal resistance or friction when pressing the keys. Both switches aim to provide a satisfying typing feel, with the Box CJ focusing on a smoother glide while the Roselle prioritizes a frictionless travel.
Taking all factors into consideration, the Gateron Box CJ and HC Studio Roselle switches offer distinct advantages in sound and feel preferences. The Box CJ excels in producing a clacky sound and providing a smooth push feel, making it ideal for those who seek a snappy typing experience. On the other hand, the Roselle stands out for its low-pitched sound profile and frictionless typing feel, catering to individuals looking for a deeper and smoother keystroke sensation. Depending on personal preferences for sound and feel, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance the overall typing experience, allowing users to customize their mechanical keyboard to suit their specific preferences. Ultimately, users can expect similar results in terms of quality and performance, as both the Gateron Box CJ and HC Studio Roselle switches are designed to deliver exceptional typing experiences with their respective sound and feel characteristics.
Conclusion
To sum up, when considering whether to choose the Gateron Box CJ linear switch or the HC Studio Roselle linear switch, you should take into account your preference for bottom out force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force of 57 grams and enjoy a clacky sound profile with a smooth push feel, the Box CJ may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force of 52 grams and enjoy a low-pitched sound with an impossibly smooth and frictionless typing experience, the Roselle might be the better option. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will come down to personal preference and the typing experience you are seeking.
Mentioned in this article
