United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron Box CJ vs. Wuque Studio WS Pearl

An in-depth look at the Gateron Box CJ and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When exploring mechanical keyboard switches, the Gateron Box CJ and Wuque Studio WS Pearl stand out as two compelling linear options, each offering distinct benefits to typists and gamers alike. The Gateron Box CJ is celebrated for its swift response time, making it ideal for users who prioritize speed and precision. Its higher-pitched clacks and unparalleled smoothness—derived from its unlubed design—provide a raw typing experience that can be customized, catering to enthusiasts who enjoy personalizing their gear. On the other hand, the WS Pearl switch brings a unique twist with its incorporation of ball-bearings, significantly reducing friction and resulting in a sublime, near-effortless keystroke. This switch yields a medium-high pitch sound, adding a pleasing auditory element to its remarkably smooth operation. Both switches cater to different preferences: the Box CJ for those who relish in a direct, customizable feel and the WS Pearl for those who seek an ultra-smooth and frictionless experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

30g

Bottom-out force

57g

Bottom-out force

58g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

15.4mm single-stage spring

Spring

16mm single-staged spring

Housing materials

The Gateron Box CJ and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl differ significantly in their choice of top housing materials, which profoundly influence the sound characteristics each switch produces. The Box CJ employs a polycarbonate top housing, known for its rigidity and ability to create a pronounced higher-pitched and crisp sound profile. This material's resonant qualities lead to a clearer auditory experience, particularly appealing to users who prioritize sharp acoustics in their typing experience. In contrast, the WS Pearl features a nylon top housing, which offers a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the material's softer and more sound-absorbing properties. This divergence highlights how housing material directly shapes the overall auditory output of a switch, with the Box CJ catering to those who prefer brightness, while the WS Pearl appeals to fans of warmth and richness in sound.

In terms of bottom housing, both switches utilize nylon, which fosters a consistent audio experience across the two models. The nylon bottom housing in the Gateron Box CJ contributes to a muted and rounded sound profile, similar to that provided by the WS Pearl's nylon bottom housing. This shared material choice means that, regardless of their differing top housings, both switches will produce a fuller sound when the key is bottomed out. Thus, the user experience for bottom-out feedback will be notably similar across both models, as nylon's inherent properties govern the sound characteristics from the bottom housing.

Ultimately, the impact of the housing materials manifests in the overall typing experience. While both switches share the nylon bottom housing, the contrasting top housings of the Box CJ and WS Pearl will determine the unique auditory signature when keys are released. Users seeking a crisp, articulate sound may gravitate towards the Box CJ, while those desiring a more rounded and resonant profile might prefer the WS Pearl. The synergy between the soft nylon and the differing top materials ultimately culminates in a varied yet complementary sound experience. By understanding these nuances in housing materials, enthusiasts can better tailor their choice of switch to align with their desired typing acoustics.

Weight

When comparing the actuation and bottom out forces of the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch, there are notable differences. The Box CJ features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 57 grams, categorizing it as medium-light in feel. In contrast, the WS Pearl is lighter with an actuation force of just 30 grams, though its bottom out force is slightly higher at 58 grams. This difference in actuation force can make the WS Pearl more suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch, making it ideal for long typing sessions or gaming marathons without fatigue. Meanwhile, the Box CJ's heavier actuation force offers a more substantial push feel, appealing to those who enjoy a stronger resistance when typing. While both switches provide a similar bottom out force, the variance in actuation forces suggests that users looking for a lighter experience should opt for the WS Pearl, while those seeking a more robust typing experience may gravitate towards the Box CJ.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch, the Box CJ stands out with a travel distance of 4 mm, while the WS Pearl offers a shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This difference means that the Box CJ will provide a more pronounced tactile experience, which some users might find preferable for a traditional typing feel, while the WS Pearl’s shorter travel distance may cater to gamers seeking quicker response times. If you favor a swift and responsive experience, the WS Pearl is the better option; however, if you enjoy a deeper and more substantial press, the Box CJ is ideal. Thus, while both switches serve different preferences, their distinct travel distances highlight the importance of choosing the right type based on your individual needs.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron Box CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Box CJ for $5.35.

The Wuque Studio WS Pearl comes in at $6.00 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

The sound profile of the Gateron Box CJ switch leans towards a higher-pitched clackiness, which makes it particularly engaging for typists who enjoy sharp, bright auditory feedback as they type. This switch produces a percussive and crisp sound, adding a lively character to the typing experience. It has characteristics that could also be perceived as neutral by some, making it suitable for various environments, including both home and office settings. In contrast, the WS Pearl switch generates a medium-high-pitched sound. While specific descriptors are not provided, one can expect a more refined audio experience akin to the Box CJ, though with a potentially smoother output thanks to its unique ball-bearing mechanism, which can alter the overall acoustics.

When it comes to the tactile feel, the Gateron Box CJ offers a smooth keystroke that typists will likely appreciate, particularly for its mild nature, making it approachable for users of all skill levels. The unlubed aspect gives a drier feel that certain enthusiasts might find satisfying for a less obstructive typing experience, while also creating an opportunity for customization through aftermarket lubricants. On the other hand, the WS Pearl is designed to provide a surreal level of smoothness due to its ball-bearing mechanism, which substantially reduces friction. Although explicit descriptors of its feel are not provided, the inherent design suggests a focus on providing an effortlessly smooth experience that could rival the Box CJ’s mild typing sensation.

In summary, both the Gateron Box CJ and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switches are engineered for a smooth typing experience. The Box CJ is characterized by its higher-pitched clacky sound profile and mild feel, appealing to users who enjoy auditory feedback and an approachable typing experience. The WS Pearl, with its unique ball-bearing design, promises exceptional smoothness and a medium-high pitch sound signature, although specific tactile qualities remain unspecified. Ultimately, while both switches may deliver satisfying results in terms of sound and feel, personal preference regarding sound signature and tactile feedback will guide newcomers in choosing between them.

Conclusion

To conclude, your choice between the Gateron Box CJ linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Pearl linear switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you prioritize a lightweight and fast typing experience, the Box CJ is an excellent option, especially if you enjoy a higher-pitched, clacky sound that can provide auditory satisfaction during your sessions. Its intentionally unlubed feel allows for customization, enabling you to adjust the smoothness to your liking if you're an enthusiast looking to experiment with lubrication. On the other hand, if you seek a uniquely smooth and effortless keystroke, the WS Pearl's ball-bearing design is a game-changer, allowing for a seamless typing experience that's remarkably satisfying. With its medium actuation force and medium-high pitch sound profile, it's versatile and suitable for various environments, whether at home or in the office. Ultimately, you should consider how you want your keyboard to feel and sound while typing; each switch offers distinct benefits that cater to different preferences.

Mentioned in this article