United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Kailh Box Jade vs. Wuque Studio WS Jade

An in-depth look at the Kailh Box Jade and the Wuque Studio WS Jade switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to choosing between the Kailh Box Jade and the Wuque Studio WS Jade mechanical keyboard switches, you'll be faced with a decision between a clicky and a linear switch. The Box Jade is perfect for those who prefer a medium-heavy typing experience with a clicky sound profile and tactile feedback, thanks to its crisp clicks and crunchy tactile bumps. On the other hand, the WS Jade stands out for its metallic insert in the stem base, creating a bright and resonant sound profile, along with a light diffuser for a captivating RGB display. Typing on the WS Jade offers a creamy and smooth experience with a rock-solid bottom-out. Both switches have their unique characteristics that cater to different preferences and typing styles. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

UPE

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

Plate (3-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Kailh Box spring

Spring

18mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

Overall, the housing materials of the Kailh Box Jade and the Wuque Studio WS Jade switches offer different characteristics when it comes to sound profiles and typing experiences. The Box Jade's polycarbonate top housing provides a sharper and crisper sound profile, ideal for those who prefer a more high-pitched typing sound. In contrast, the WS Jade's POM top housing delivers a deeper and more muted sound, catering to users who enjoy a softer typing experience. Both materials have their own unique advantages, with polycarbonate being clear and suitable for RGB lighting, while POM offers a pleasing and distinctive sound.

Moving on to the bottom housings, the Box Jade's nylon material creates a deeper and fuller sound, thanks to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. This results in a duller and rounder sound profile that may appeal to users seeking a quieter typing experience. Similarly, the WS Jade's POM bottom housing contributes to a deep and muted sound profile, aligning with the overall characteristics of the switch. Despite the difference in materials used for the bottom housings, both switches offer a similar typing experience in terms of sound depth and roundness.

In conclusion, the choice between the Kailh Box Jade and the Wuque Studio WS Jade ultimately comes down to personal preference in sound and typing feel. While the Box Jade's polycarbonate top housing produces a sharper sound and the nylon bottom housing creates a fuller sound, the WS Jade's POM top and bottom housings offer a deeper and more muted typing experience. Whether you prefer a crisper, high-pitched sound or a softer, deeper tone, both switches provide unique options for customizing your typing experience. Ultimately, regardless of the differences in housing materials, both switches are designed to deliver a satisfying and enjoyable typing experience for keyboard enthusiasts.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Kailh Box Jade clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, they both have the same actuation force of 50 grams and bottom out force of 60 grams, making them equal in weight. This means that users can expect a consistent typing experience in terms of force required for keystrokes and bottoming out. The actuation force determines the amount of force needed to trigger a keystroke, while bottom out force measures the pressure required to press the key all the way down. Both switches have a medium actuation and bottom out force, providing a balanced typing experience. Some users may prefer a lighter weight for longer typing sessions, while others may prefer a heavier weight for a more substantial typing experience. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preference for actuation and bottom out force.

Travel distance

Both the Kailh Box Jade clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch have the same travel distance of 3.6 mm. This means that when pressing down on either switch, you will experience a similar amount of key travel from the top to the bottom. In terms of travel distance, there is no difference between the two switches, so you can expect comparable results when using either one. Whether you prefer a clicky or linear switch, both the Box Jade and WS Jade offer the same travel distance for a consistent typing experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

For 10 switches, the Kailh Box Jade comes in at $5.50, whereas the Wuque Studio WS Jade comes in at $4.30.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Kailh Box Jade switch is known for its high-pitched and crunchy sound profile, creating a sharp and crisp auditory experience reminiscent of stepping on crunchy autumn leaves. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade switch produces a clacky and resonant sound, giving off a bright and percussive tone with a clean and sharp profile. While both switches offer unique sound characteristics, the Box Jade leans towards a sharper clicky sound, while the WS Jade provides a more resonant and metallic tone.

In terms of feel, the Kailh Box Jade switch offers an invigorating typing experience with pronounced tactile feedback and a medium-heavy actuation force. This creates a tactile sensation that is not overwhelming yet still provides a satisfying amount of feedback. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Jade switch is described as silky and creamy, offering an exceptionally smooth typing experience with minimal resistance when pressing and releasing keys. This smoothness enhances the overall typing feel, allowing for effortless keystrokes that glide across the keys with ease.

In conclusion, the Kailh Box Jade and Wuque Studio WS Jade switches each offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Box Jade provides a crisp and crunchy clicky sound paired with an invigorating tactile sensation, while the WS Jade offers a resonant and silky smooth typing experience. Depending on your preference for sound and feel, you can choose between the sharper and tactile experience of the Box Jade or the smooth and creamy typing sensation of the WS Jade. Ultimately, both switches offer distinct characteristics that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboard switches.

Conclusion

In closing, when deciding between the Kailh Box Jade clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS Jade linear switch, consider your preference for typing experience and sound profile. If you enjoy a medium-heavy typing feel with crisp clicks and tactile bumps, the Box Jades are a great choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a smooth and creamy typing experience with a bright metallic sound and solid bottom-out, the WS Jades may be more suitable. Ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and what type of typing sensation and sound profile you prefer. Consider these factors when selecting the perfect switch for your mechanical keyboard setup.

Mentioned in this article