TTC Brother vs. Wuque Studio WS POM+
An in-depth look at the TTC Brother and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the TTC Brother and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ offer distinct yet appealing characteristics that cater to different typing preferences. The TTC Brother, recognized for its clicky nature, weighs in with a lightweight actuation force of just 37g, providing users with a tactile experience that is both engaging and accessible. Its satisfying crunch and well-defined tactile bump contribute to a delightful auditory experience, making it a favorite among enthusiasts who appreciate feedback in their keystrokes. On the other hand, the WS POM+, a linear switch, showcases a unique blend of smoothness and sound, with a deep, resonant "thock" that enhances the typing experience. This switch appeals to those who seek a quieter option that still delivers satisfaction through its buttery-smooth keystrokes. While both switches have their merits—one excelling in tactile feedback and the other in silky smooth execution—they serve different needs in the world of mechanical keyboards. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
37g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.20 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
17.5mm spring
Spring
22mm extended double-stage spring
Housing materials
When comparing the materials of the TTC Brother and the Wuque Studio WS POM+, it is evident that the two switches employ different top housing materials, which impart unique sound characteristics. The Brother utilizes a polycarbonate top housing that contributes to a sharper, crisper sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate enhances clarity, particularly when it comes to higher-frequency sounds. This makes it especially effective when paired with RGB lighting, as the translucence of the polycarbonate allows for vivid light passage. In contrast, the WS POM+ employs a POM top housing, known for producing a deeper and more muted sound profile. This inherent difference in material composition means that a user will discern significantly distinct auditory experiences when pressing these switches, with the Brother's polycarbonate offering a more impactful, high-pitched resonance while the WS POM+ provides a softer, fuller tone.
Moving on to the bottom housing, both the TTC Brother and the WS POM+ switch share a common quality in utilizing materials that produce deeper sound profiles, albeit through different compositions. The Brother is equipped with a nylon bottom housing, which, as a classic switch material, absorbs sound effectively due to its softer nature, leading to a duller and rounder auditory response. In contrast, the WS POM+ utilizes a POM bottom housing, which also fosters depth and provides a unique sound, described as muted. The similarities in the sound profiles created by these bottom housings indicate that while the materials differ, they are both capable of producing cushioned, rich auditory experiences. Yet, the nuances of each material can create slight deviations in sound quality and tactile feedback.
Ultimately, the combination of top and bottom housings in both switches further delineates their respective sound qualities. With the TTC Brother providing a sharper sound due to its polycarbonate top, paired with a fuller sound from its nylon bottom, users can expect a well-rounded auditory experience that balances crispness with warmth. On the other hand, the WS POM+, with both top and bottom composed of POM material, offers a consistent deep and muted audio experience, making it appealing for those seeking a more subdued sound profile. Therefore, while the material differences lead to variances in sound, both switches can yield similar overall results depending on user preferences, highlighting the multi-faceted nature of switch design.
Weight
When comparing the TTC Brother clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, there are notable differences in their actuation forces. The Brother switch has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams, which may appeal to users who prefer a less strenuous typing experience, making it ideal for prolonged use during work or gaming sessions. In contrast, the WS POM+ switch has a heavier actuation force of 45 grams, suitable for those who enjoy a more substantial feel while typing. Additionally, the bottom out force for the Brother switch is unknown, while the WS POM+ has a bottom out force of 55 grams, providing a clear indication of resistance when fully pressed. This heavier bottom out can create a more definitive typing experience compared to the lighter Brother switch. Overall, those looking for a lighter option might prefer the TTC Brother, while those desiring a firmer push should consider the WS POM+.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the TTC Brother clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch, there is a slight difference to note: the Brother switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the WS POM+ measures at 3.6 mm. This makes the Brother switch the shorter option by 0.1 mm. For gamers and those who favor quicker response times, the TTC Brother may be more appealing due to its shorter travel distance, providing a more immediate feedback sensation. Conversely, the WS POM+ offers a longer travel distance that could be preferred by users who enjoy a more robust and grounded typing experience. Although both switches are relatively close in distance, the choice between them can significantly affect tactile feel and responsiveness, depending on individual preferences.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The TTC Brother has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Brother for $3.30.
The Wuque Studio WS POM+ comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the TTC Brother clicky switch delivers a distinctly crunchy auditory experience. This sound can be likened to stepping on crisp autumn leaves, providing a satisfying auditory feedback that appeals to the enthusiasts of clicky switches. The click is sharp and precise, ensuring that each keystroke is accompanied by a clear sound, contributing to an actively engaging typing experience. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS POM+ switch is characterized by a deep, satisfying "thock." This sound is generally softer and more resonant than the Brother's click, offering a more subdued yet pleasurable auditory feedback. The choice of sound will ultimately depend on personal preference: those who enjoy a more pronounced click will lean towards the Brother, while those preferring a deeper thock may find the WS POM+ to be their ideal choice.
In terms of feel, the Brother switch is noted for its easy-to-press characteristics that require minimal force, making for a comfortable typing experience with reduced finger fatigue during prolonged use. The tactile feedback is stepped, meaning it offers a clear distinction between the pre-travel and post-travel phases of the keystroke, which allows typists to experience a refined sensation without being overwhelming. On the other hand, the feel of the WS POM+ remains unknown; its buttery-smooth keystroke suggests a linear, unbroken typing experience, but without tactile feedback, the comparison remains incomplete.
Taking all of this into consideration, the TTC Brother clicky switch provides an exciting and tactile journey characterized by its crunchy sound and nuanced feel. Meanwhile, the WS POM+ promises a smooth and deeper sonic experience with its thock sound, leaving an impression of quality, though its tactile characteristics are not well-defined. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on individual preferences regarding sound and feel—whether one prefers the lively experience of a clicky switch or the smoothness of a linear variant. Both serve distinct purposes and cater to different typing styles, ensuring that there is something for everyone within this realm of mechanical keyboards.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the TTC Brother clicky switch and the Wuque Studio WS POM+ linear switch ultimately hinges on your personal preferences and typing style. If you thrive on tactile feedback and enjoy an auditory experience featuring crisp, crunchy clicks, the Brother switch is your go-to option. Its lightweight actuation and distinct tactile bump make it an ideal choice for those who engage in prolonged typing sessions, as it minimizes finger fatigue while delivering an engaging feedback experience that many clicky enthusiasts cherish. On the other hand, if you prefer a smoother, quieter feel with a deep "thock" sound signature, the WS POM+ linear switch may be more suitable for your needs. Its medium-light bottom-out force ensures a comfortable typing experience, complementing users who favor fluid motion over tactile feedback. Therefore, consider what aspects are most important to you in a switch—whether it's the satisfying crunch of clicks or the buttery-smooth flow of linear strokes—to make the best choice for your mechanical keyboard journey.
Mentioned in this article
