Bsun Pine vs. Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile
An in-depth look at the Bsun Pine and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Bsun Pine and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile mechanical keyboard switches, both belonging to the tactile category, we see distinct features that cater to different preferences. The Bsun Pine switch is renowned for its sharp tactile bump and quick bottom-out, providing a direct and no-nonsense typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile switch offers a smooth yet perceptible bump with a neutral sound signature, appealing to those who seek a more subdued typing experience. While the Pine switch is praised for its accented and sharp feel, the WS Light Tactile switch is favored for its stepped and easy-to-press attributes. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
65g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
15.4mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Bsun Pine and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile, it is evident that both switches utilize polycarbonate for their top housing. Polycarbonate is known to create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to its stiffness, making it ideal for switches with RGB lighting. This commonality suggests that both the Pine and the WS Light Tactile will produce similar sound profiles and aesthetics related to their top housings.
However, where the two switches differ is in their choice of bottom housing material. The Pine features a nylon bottom housing, known for eliciting a deeper and fuller sound profile by absorbing more sound than harder plastics. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing, implying that both switches will offer a similar typing experience with a duller and rounder sound quality stemming from the softer nylon material.
Taking into consideration how the qualities of the housing materials are split between the top and bottom of a switch, it can be inferred that the Bsun Pine and Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile will differ slightly in the overall typing experience. The bottom housing will have a bigger impact on the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, while the top housing will influence the sound when a key is released. Despite these differences, both switches share the advantage of using polycarbonate for their top housing, ensuring a clear and resonant sound profile with the added bonus of compatibility with RGB lighting.
Weight
The Bsun Pine tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch both have an actuation force of 45 grams, providing a consistent typing experience in terms of the force needed to register a keystroke. However, when it comes to the bottom out force, the Pine switch requires 65 grams, while the WS Light Tactile only needs 50 grams. This makes the WS Light Tactile switch lighter and easier to bottom out compared to the Pine switch. For those who prefer a lighter touch and a smoother typing experience, the WS Light Tactile would be the ideal choice. On the other hand, the Pine switch offers a more substantial typing experience with a heavier bottom out force. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will depend on the user's preference for actuation and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Bsun Pine tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm, which is shorter compared to the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile tactile switch with a travel distance of 4 mm. The Pine offers a quicker response time due to its shorter travel distance, making it a preferred choice for gamers who require fast reactions. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile provides a deeper press with its longer travel distance, appealing to users who enjoy a more substantial keystroke feel. Both switches offer unique advantages based on their respective travel distances, catering to different preferences and needs. Ultimately, the choice between the two would depend on individual preferences for travel distance in a tactile switch.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Bsun Pine has an MSRP of $4.70 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $3.70.
The Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile comes in at $4.20 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Bsun Pine switch is well-known for its sharp and distinct tactile bump, which may result in a more audible typing experience compared to the neutral sound signature of the WS Light Tactile switch. The Pine's direct and no-nonsense tactility could potentially create a more pronounced and satisfying sound with each keypress, while the WS Light Tactile's moderate sound profile suits a variety of environments and preferences. Ultimately, the sound produced by these switches will also be influenced by external factors such as the keyboard build and keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Bsun Pine switch offers an invigorating and sharp typing sensation with its accentuated and snappy tactile feedback. The Pine's strong tactile bump provides a distinct feeling with each key press, making typing feel more alive and engaging. On the other hand, the WS Light Tactile switch boasts an easy-to-press and stepped tactile experience, offering a gentler and more mild tactility compared to the Pine. The Light Tactile's light actuation force and responsive feel aim to enhance typing comfort and reduce finger fatigue during extended use.
Considering the subjective qualities of the Bsun Pine tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch, it's evident that both switches offer unique typing experiences tailored to different preferences. While the Pine excels in providing a sharp and invigorating tactile feedback with potentially more audible sound, the WS Light Tactile focuses on a smoother and neutral typing feel with a moderate sound profile. Ultimately, the decision between these switches will depend on personal preference for tactility, sound level, and typing comfort. If you enjoy a pronounced and sharp tactile experience, the Bsun Pine may be the way to go, while if you prefer a more subtle and easy-to-press tactile sensation, the WS Light Tactile switch would be a suitable choice. Both switches offer distinct qualities that can enhance your typing experience based on your individual preferences.
Conclusion
In closing, when choosing between the BSUN Pine tactile switch and the Wuque Studio WS Light Tactile switch, consider the specific qualities and preferences that align with your typing style and needs. If you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force with a sharp and invigorating tactile feedback, the Pine switch would be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force with a smooth and easy-to-press feel, the WS Light Tactile switch would be more suitable. Both switches offer unique typing experiences, so ultimately, the decision comes down to personal preference and what feels most comfortable and enjoyable for you.
Mentioned in this article
