United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Zuoce Bubblegum vs. Wuque Studio WS Morandi

An in-depth look at the Zuoce Bubblegum and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch to the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch, one can see a stark contrast in their characteristics. The Bubblegum switch, known for its clacky and bouncy typing experience, is an excellent choice for enthusiasts seeking a tactile and engaging feedback while typing. On the other hand, the WS Morandi switch stands out for its innovative design and visual aesthetics, providing a buttery, creamy, and subdued typing experience that is complemented by a mesmerizing RGB lighting effect. While the Bubblegum switch offers a more pronounced tactile response, the WS Morandi switch boasts a smoother and more relaxing typing feel. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

37g

Actuation force

50g

Bottom-out force

45g

Bottom-out force

60g

Pre-travel

1.80 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM+SL

Stem material

UPE

Top housing material

POM

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

18mm double-stage spring

Housing materials

The Zuoce Bubblegum and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi both utilize POM as their top housing material, creating a pleasing and unique sound profile that leans towards the deeper side and is relatively muted. However, the key point of differentiation comes in their bottom housing materials. The Bubblegum features a nylon bottom housing, known for eliciting a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. On the other hand, the WS Morandi opts for a POM bottom housing, which complements the top housing in creating a similar sound profile that is deep and muted.

The contrasting housing materials of the Bubblegum and WS Morandi result in a unique typing experience for users. The nylon bottom housing of the Bubblegum provides a tactile feel and a deeper, fuller sound when a key is pressed, enhancing the typing experience with its softer plastic that absorbs more sound. In comparison, the POM bottom housing of the WS Morandi offers a different tactile feel and sound profile, enriching the typing experience with its ability to create a similarly deep and muted sound as the POM top housing.

While the top and bottom housings of the Zuoce Bubblegum and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi differ in material, both switches ultimately aim to provide users with a satisfying typing experience. The split qualities between the top and bottom housings contribute to the overall sound and feel of the switches, with the bottom housing influencing the bottom-out sound and feel when a key is pressed, while the top housing impacts the sound when a key is released. Despite the differences in housing materials, both switches offer a unique typing experience that caters to individuals looking for a deeper, more muted sound profile in their mechanical keyboards.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch, there are noticeable differences. The Bubblegum switch has a lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, providing a softer and more effortless typing experience. On the other hand, the WS Morandi switch has a heavier actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 60 grams, offering a more substantial and tactile typing feel. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Bubblegum switch, ideal for extended periods of typing or gaming sessions. In contrast, individuals seeking a more pronounced keystroke sensation may lean towards the WS Morandi switch. Overall, the actuation and bottom out forces play a significant role in determining the typing experience and feel of each switch, catering to different preferences and needs.

Travel distance

The travel distance of both the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch is 3.5 mm, which means that pressing down on either switch will result in a similar feel in terms of travel distance. Both switches offer a consistent and satisfying keystroke experience with an equal amount of distance to cover when typing. In this aspect, the travel distance of the two switches is the same, providing a familiar sensation to users regardless of which switch is chosen.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Zuoce Bubblegum has an MSRP of $3.10 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Bubblegum for $2.30.

The Wuque Studio WS Morandi comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch is known for its sharp and snappy clacky sound, providing a crisp and bright auditory experience when typing. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch offers a more low-pitched and subdued sound profile, with a thocky quality that produces a deep, rich, and satisfying tone. While the Bubblegum switch delivers a more pronounced and energetic sound, the Morandi switch provides a smoother and more relaxed auditory experience, catering to different preferences in sound aesthetics.

Moving on to feel, the Zuoce Bubblegum switch is recognized for its bouncy sensation, offering a spring-like feedback that adds liveliness to each key press. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Morandi switch is described as buttery and creamy, providing a smooth and fluid typing experience that feels seamless and effortless. With a silky typing sensation, the Morandi switch ensures that keystrokes glide with ease, enhancing the overall typing comfort and satisfaction. While the Bubblegum switch offers a more dynamic and responsive feel, the Morandi switch focuses on delivering a luxurious and consistent typing experience.

Overall, the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch present distinct qualities in both sound and feel. The Bubblegum switch stands out with its clacky sound and bouncy feedback, appealing to those who prefer a more energetic typing experience. On the other hand, the Morandi switch impresses with its low-pitched and subdued sound, coupled with a buttery and creamy feel for a smooth and luxurious typing sensation. Depending on personal preferences for sound and tactile feedback, both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different typing styles and preferences, ensuring that users can find a switch that suits their individual needs.

Conclusion

In closing, when it comes to choosing between the Zuoce Bubblegum linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Morandi linear switch, consider your preferences for typing experience. If you prioritize a light and clacky typing feel with a vibrant visual appeal, the Bubblegum switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-weight switch with a smooth and buttery keystroke that offers a more subdued sound profile, the WS Morandi switch could be the better option. Ultimately, your decision should be based on what type of typing experience you value most. Happy typing!

Mentioned in this article