HMX Canglan V2 vs. Jwick Taro
An in-depth look at the HMX Canglan V2 and the Jwick Taro switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, preferences often boil down to the tactile experiences they offer, and two notable contenders in the market are the HMX Canglan V2 and the Jwick Taro. The Canglan V2, a linear switch, boasts a satisfyingly thocky sound profile and a smooth, light feel, making it ideal for users who crave a consistent keystroke without the interruption of tactile feedback. Its silky and bouncy characteristics provide an enjoyable typing experience that many enthusiasts have come to adore. On the other hand, the Jwick Taro, a tactile switch, offers a more pronounced typing experience with its snappy, medium-level tactility and acute, crisp clacks that engage typists and gamers alike. The buttery feel of the Taro caters to those who appreciate a tangible sensation upon each keystroke, making it a suitable choice for precise typing tasks. While each switch has its unique qualities, your choice ultimately depends on your personal preference for sound, feel, and responsiveness. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
N/A
Bottom-out force
48g
Bottom-out force
67g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.70 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
No
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T2
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the HMX Canglan V2 and the Jwick Taro, a significant difference lies in their top housings. The Canglan V2 features a nylon top housing, which is known for its ability to produce a deeper and fuller sound profile. This characteristic is largely attributed to nylon’s softer plastic composition, which absorbs more sound than stiffer materials. As a result, users often enjoy a mellow auditory experience that can feel more subdued and rounded during use. In contrast, the Taro utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which is stiffer and results in a sharpened sound profile. The polycarbonate's rigidity contributes to a crisper and more resonant audio quality, making it especially appealing for those who appreciate a brighter sound, particularly when using RGB lighting.
On the other hand, both the Canglan V2 and the Taro share the same housing material for their bottoms: nylon. This commonality means that when considering the bottom-out sound and tactile feedback, users can expect a richer, fuller experience from both models. As described, nylon's softer composition contributes to a more muted auditory response when the key is fully pressed down. This results in a comforting and cushioned typing feel, regardless of the switch model. Since they both feature nylon along the bottom, users of the Canglan V2 and Taro will experience similar sound qualities in this respect, emphasizing the role of the bottom housing in affecting the typing sensation and bottom-out sound.
Ultimately, the contrasting materials of the top housings define the auditory experience between the HMX Canglan V2 and the Jwick Taro, while their shared nylon bottom housing unites them in terms of sound profile during keypresses. Users who prefer a softer and more rounded sound will likely gravitate towards the Canglan V2, while those who favor a sharper and more resonant output may favor the Taro. Because of the interplay between the materials, typists can find satisfaction from both switches, with the nylon bottom providing a consistent foundation that balances each switch's distinctive top housing characteristics.
Weight
The HMX Canglan V2 linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch exhibit notable differences in their actuation and bottom out forces, impacting the typing experience they offer. The Canglan V2 features a light actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, making it ideal for users who prefer a softer touch and longer typing sessions. In contrast, the Taro switch has an unspecified actuation force but boasts a significantly heavier bottom out force of 67 grams, categorizing it as medium-heavy. This heavier resistance may appeal to those seeking a more substantial feel when typing. As a result, while the Canglan V2 is the lighter option, perfect for extended use, the Jwick Taro provides a firmer response for users who favor a stronger push feel. Overall, their differing forces cater to varied preferences in typing style, allowing users to choose based on their specific needs and comfort.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX Canglan V2 linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch, it’s evident that the Canglan V2, with a travel distance of 3.5 mm, is shorter than the Taro, which has a travel distance of 3.7 mm. This difference of 0.2 mm may seem minor, but it can significantly affect the typing experience. Gamers, who typically prefer quicker response times, would likely gravitate towards the Canglan V2 due to its shorter travel distance, allowing for more rapid keystrokes. On the other hand, those who favor a more gradual feel when typing might opt for the Taro, as its longer 3.7 mm travel offers a deeper engagement. In summary, if you desire a more responsive experience, the Canglan V2 would be the better choice, while the Taro appeals to those who prefer a more substantial keystroke.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX Canglan V2 has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Canglan V2 for $2.99.
The Jwick Taro has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Taro for $4.25.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When comparing the sound qualities of the HMX Canglan V2 linear switch with the Jwick Taro tactile switch, notable differences emerge. The Canglan V2 is celebrated for its low-pitched, thocky sound signature, producing a satisfying deep "thud" when pressed and released. This creates an engaging auditory experience, perfect for those who prefer a rich tonal quality. In contrast, the Jwick Taro switches generate sharp, acute clacks. While both switches offer distinct sounds that cater to different preferences, users may gravitate towards the Canglan V2 for a more mellow and bass-heavy sound, while the Taro appeals to those who enjoy a crisp auditory feedback.
In terms of feel, the Canglan V2 excels with its silky, feathery, and bouncy characteristics. It provides a remarkably smooth typing experience that minimizes resistance, enhancing comfort during extended use. The light actuation force means less strain on the fingers, making it suitable for prolonged typing or gaming sessions. Conversely, the Jwick Taro switches are described as buttery and stepped, offering a smooth keystroke along with a subtle tactile feedback that catches users off guard. This tactile sensation, while present, is more subdued than that found in hypertactile switches, providing a mild, two-stage experience that can be satisfying for those who prefer some tactile definition without overwhelming intensity.
In conclusion, both the HMX Canglan V2 and the Jwick Taro switches deliver unique experiences tailored to different preferences. The thocky, low-pitched sound of the Canglan V2 contrasts with the sharp, acute clacks of the Taro, appealing to diverse auditory tastes. The tactile experience also differs, with the Canglan V2 providing an exceptionally smooth and light feel compared to the Taro's more noticeable tactile feedback. Ultimately, your choice will hinge on whether you prioritize sound profile or tactile feedback, but both switches guarantee enjoyable typing experiences that can cater to varied preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, choosing between the HMX Canglan V2 linear switch and the Jwick Taro tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal typing preferences and intended use. If you value a light, smooth, and thocky experience, especially during extended typing sessions or gaming marathons, the Canglan V2 is an excellent choice. Its low actuation force makes it ideal for those who may experience finger fatigue easily, while its deep sound signature adds an impressive auditory dimension to your keystrokes. On the other hand, if you prefer a more responsive, tactile feedback while typing, the Taro switch would be the way to go. Its medium-heavy actuation force and crisp, snappy tactility provide a gratifying typing experience, especially for those who enjoy feeling a distinct bump when pressing the keys. In essence, if your focus is on a leisurely and silky typing feel, opt for the Canglan V2, but if you desire a more interactive typing experience, go with the Jwick Taro. Ultimately, the choice lies in what enhances your comfort and enjoyment while typing.
Mentioned in this article
