Huano Caramel Latte vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the Huano Caramel Latte and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Huano Caramel Latte and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 offer compelling choices for those seeking a smooth linear typing experience. The Huano Caramel Latte stands out with a medium actuation weight of 50g and a bright, clacky sound profile, making it an excellent option for typists and gamers who enjoy feedback in every keystroke. Its embodiment of tactile delight contributes to an overall satisfying typing journey, ideal for long sessions of writing or gaming. On the other hand, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 may not boast specific renowned features, it still provides a linear feel that many users appreciate for its smooth keypresses and quiet operation, allowing for a more subdued typing atmosphere. Both switches cater to different preferences: the Caramel Latte for those who crave an auditory element coupled with tactile satisfaction, and the Lotus V2 for users who favor a straightforward and serene typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POK
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Huano Caramel Latte and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, one of the key distinctions lies in the top housing materials. The Caramel Latte employs a POK top housing, which offers a remarkably low coefficient of friction and exceptional durability. With a wear resistance significantly superior to POM and enhanced shock resistance compared to Nylon, the POK material contributes to a smooth tactile experience during operation. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 utilizes a POM top housing, which, while also smooth, is inherently different in its sound profile. POM is known for its muted and deeper sound, offering a distinct auditory experience that contrasts with the lively and clacky nature associated with POK. This divergence in top housing materials not only affects the tactile experience but also significantly influences the acoustic character of each switch.
In terms of the bottom housing, both the Huano Caramel Latte and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 incorporate POM, but they approach sound and performance from different angles. The Caramel Latte's nylon bottom housing is designed to absorb sound more effectively, resulting in a fuller and deeper auditory experience that is softer and rounder. This material choice complements the lively POK top by providing a well-rounded sound profile. In contrast, the Lotus V2's POM bottom housing continues its theme of a deeper and more muted sound, akin to its top housing. Despite the different top materials, the shared use of POM in the bottom phase allows both switches to deliver a unique sound experience, albeit with contrasting profiles stemming from their respective top housings.
Ultimately, the individual characteristics of each switch's housing material create a split effect on performance, sound, and tactility. The Caramel Latte showcases the energetic properties of POK in the top housing while relying on the sound-absorbing qualities of nylon to achieve a rich acoustic experience. Meanwhile, the Lotus V2 maintains a consistent sound profile across both housings through its POM material, leading to deeper and more muted responses. Both switches capitalize on the strengths of their respective materials, ensuring that users can enjoy a satisfying tactile experience paired with distinctive sound signatures. While each switch has a different auditory character, they both achieve smoothness and durability through their carefully selected materials, promising an enjoyable experience regardless of preference.
Weight
When comparing the Huano Caramel Latte linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, both share the same actuation force of 45 grams, providing a consistent keystroke experience that favors typists and gamers who prefer a lighter touch, essential for extended use without fatigue. However, the two switches differ in terms of bottom out force; the Caramel Latte bottoms out at 55 grams, while the bottom out force for the Lotus V2 is unknown. This indicates that while the actuation feel is identical, the Caramel Latte offers a more tactile, definitive feel when the switch is fully pressed down, which some users may appreciate for feedback on deeper keystrokes. With the Caramel Latte being the heavier switch due to its bottom out force, users looking for a subtler experience might gravitate towards the lighter feel of the Lotus V2, despite the lack of specific bottom out data. Overall, those preferring a medium-light option with feedback may opt for the Caramel Latte, while the Lotus V2 may appeal to those seeking a lighter pressing experience, contingent upon its unknown bottom out force.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the Huano Caramel Latte linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, the Caramel Latte measures 3.6 mm, while the Lotus V2 has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. This means that for users seeking a more responsive typing experience, the Lotus V2 might be the better option due to its quicker actuation. Conversely, those who prefer a more substantial engagement might find the Caramel Latte's longer travel distance more satisfying, providing a deeper feel that can enhance the overall typing experience. Both switches fall into the modern trend of shorter travel distances, which cater to gamers and others eager for swift response times, yet they cater to slightly different preferences with the Caramel Latte offering a bit more depth compared to the Lotus V2.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Huano Caramel Latte has an MSRP of $3.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Caramel Latte for $2.75.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Huano Caramel Latte linear switch stands out with a bright, clacky sound profile that adds a tantalizing auditory dimension to the typing experience. This switch's acoustic characteristics contribute to its overall charm, making keystrokes feel lively and engaging. On the other hand, the subjective qualities of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch remain unknown, which leaves a gap in understanding how it may compare. However, it’s worth noting that the sound produced by any switch can vary significantly based on factors such as the keyboard construction, materials used, and individual keycap choices.
When considering the feel, the Caramel Latte switch is noted for its super smooth typing experience, ensuring that every keystroke is pleasurable and effortless. The medium weight of 50g at the bottom out contributes to a balanced sensation, making it suitable for both typing and gaming. As for the Jerrzi Lotus V2, its tactile feedback and overall feel remain unspecified. This ambiguity does not allow for a direct comparison, which can be crucial for a newcomer wanting to gauge whether they would prefer a smoother or more tactile typing experience.
Taking into account the sound and feel attributes, the Huano Caramel Latte linear switch offers a lively auditory experience coupled with a smooth tactile feedback, making it a strong candidate for those who value both charm and performance. In contrast, the lack of information regarding the Jerrzi Lotus V2's sound and feel makes it challenging to provide a comprehensive comparison. Ultimately, if you are looking for dynamic engagement in your typing, the Caramel Latte is an excellent choice, while further research may be required to fully appreciate what the Lotus V2 has to offer. Depending on your preferred typing experience, any similarities or dissimilarities in sound and feel may lead to a decision that caters to your specific needs.
Conclusion
To conclude, when deciding between the Huano Caramel Latte linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, your specific preferences and typing style can guide you in making the choice. If you appreciate a slightly heavier feel that is still comfortable for extended typing sessions, the Caramel Latte's medium-light bottom out force of 55 grams paired with its smooth and satisfying keystroke may suit you perfectly. It’s particularly ideal if you enjoy a bright, clacky sound profile that adds character to your typing experience. On the other hand, if you favor an ultra-smooth keystroke and a quieter setup, the Lotus V2 could be a worthy consideration, especially if its characteristics were described. However, it’s essential to note that there isn't much detailed information available on the Lotus V2, which can make it a less predictable choice. Therefore, if you’re seeking a reliable switch with known qualities, you may lean towards the Huano Caramel Latte, while keeping the Jerrzi Lotus V2 in mind if you’re looking for something unique yet undefined. Ultimately, the decision depends on what you prioritize in your typing experience—be it sound, feel, or weight—so consider trying both options if possible to see which aligns best with your preferences.
Mentioned in this article
