Huano Caramel Latte vs. KTT Mannan Pipefish
An in-depth look at the Huano Caramel Latte and the KTT Mannan Pipefish switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When selecting a mechanical keyboard switch, the differences between options can significantly impact your typing experience. The Huano Caramel Latte, a linear switch, is renowned for its medium weight of 50g at bottom-out, providing a satisfying clacky sound profile that many enthusiasts appreciate. This switch is ideal for those who enjoy a tactile response with every key press, making it a favorite for gamers and typists alike seeking a balanced performance. In contrast, the KTT Mannan Pipefish also offers a linear experience but distinguishes itself with a lighter actuation force of 45g, complemented by a lengthened spring that promises a more effortless typing journey. This switch caters to users who prioritize comfort and ease, making it an excellent choice for casual typists or anyone looking to minimize finger fatigue. While both switches deliver a smooth typing experience, they cater to different preferences and use cases. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the switch that suits you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
55g
Bottom-out force
45g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
POK
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Spring
22mm spring
Housing materials
When comparing the housing materials of the Huano Caramel Latte and the KTT Mannan Pipefish, we find that notable differences exist in their top housing compositions. The Caramel Latte features a POK (polyketone) top housing, recognized for its low coefficient of friction and remarkable durability. With a wear resistance that surpasses POM by a factor of fourteen and enhanced shock resistance compared to Nylon, POK contributes to a smooth and clacky sound profile. In contrast, the Mannan Pipefish utilizes polycarbonate for its top housing, a material known for its rigidity and ability to produce a sharper, crisper sound. The translucency of polycarbonate makes it an ideal choice for RGB setups, allowing for an aesthetically pleasing illumination that enhances visual effects during use. While both materials come with distinct auditory characteristics and aesthetic advantages, they serve different purposes in shaping the overall switch performance.
Interestingly, both switches share the same material for their bottom housing: nylon. This consistent choice of material leads to similar sound attributes, as nylon's softer composition is known to absorb sound, generating a deeper and fuller profile. Consequently, the bottom housing plays a significant role in determining the overall acoustic experience when typing, regardless of the differing top materials. The rounded sound produced by nylon serves to balance the various tonal qualities of the activated switch, ensuring a cohesive auditory experience. Therefore, while the top housings diverge in their structure and resulting sound dynamics, the bottom housings of both switches create a shared foundation of acoustic performance.
In summary, the juxtaposition of POK and polycarbonate top housings of the Huano Caramel Latte and KTT Mannan Pipefish illustrates how the choice of materials influences not only the auditory experience but also the aesthetic presentation. Meanwhile, the uniformity of nylon in the bottom housing results in commonalities in sound profile that bridge the gap between the two switches. If one aims for a specific typing experience, understanding how each housing material contributes to the overall performance can serve as an invaluable guide for selecting the ideal switch. By balancing the qualities of the different top and bottom materials, users can achieve an individual switch experience that harmonizes durability, sound clarity, and visual appeal.
Weight
When comparing the Huano Caramel Latte linear switch and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch, notable differences arise in both their actuation and bottom out forces. The Caramel Latte features an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 55 grams, categorizing it as medium-light and appealing to users who appreciate a balance between responsiveness and a satisfying keystroke. Conversely, the Mannan Pipefish boasts an actuation force of just 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams, indicating that it is lighter and ideal for those seeking a more effortless typing experience. While both switches provide distinct feedback during use, the Caramel Latte requires more force, making it a better choice for users who prefer a firmer push feel and a more substantial typing experience. In contrast, the Pipefish caters to users who favor quicker, lighter keystrokes for extended typing sessions or gaming. Overall, those who lean towards lighter switches may find the KTT Mannan Pipefish more suitable, while the heavier Huano Caramel Latte appeals to those who enjoy a little more resistance in their keystrokes.
Travel distance
The Huano Caramel Latte linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This means that if you prefer a more responsive experience, the Caramel Latte may be the better option due to its shorter travel distance, allowing for quicker keystrokes. On the other hand, if you enjoy a more substantial feel while typing or gaming, the Mannan Pipefish might suit your needs better with its longer travel distance. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches boils down to personal preference: those who seek rapid response times might gravitate towards the Caramel Latte, while users who appreciate a heartier depth will find the Mannan Pipefish more appealing.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Huano Caramel Latte has an MSRP of $3.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Caramel Latte for $2.75.
The KTT Mannan Pipefish has an MSRP of $3.53 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Mannan Pipefish for $3.05.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Huano Caramel Latte switch produces a bright, clacky sound profile, which many typists find pleasurable and lively. This makes them suitable for environments where a bit of acoustic feedback is appreciated, adding an engaging element to each keystroke. On the other hand, the KTT Mannan Pipefish is characterized by a neutral sound profile. This means it operates with a moderate sound level, allowing for versatile use in both home and work settings. While the Caramel Latte's acoustic signature may appeal to those who enjoy a more pronounced auditory experience, the Mannan Pipefish caters to those seeking a quieter typing environment. Keep in mind that the overall sound can vary based on factors such as board construction and keycap choice.
When considering the feel of these switches, the Huano Caramel Latte offers a smooth typing experience with a medium weight of 50g bottom-out force. This balance provides satisfying resistance, making each keystroke feel deliberate yet fluid. In contrast, the KTT Mannan Pipefish is designed with an easy-to-press action, employing a lighter 45g actuation and bottom-out force that minimizes effort during typing. With a polished finish, the Pipefish ensures smooth key travel and reduces friction, making for a comfortable typing experience. While both switches strive to enhance user enjoyment, the Caramel Latte leans towards a more pronounced tactile experience, while the Pipefish promotes a lighter and more effortless touch.
In conclusion, both the Huano Caramel Latte and KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switches offer unique advantages that cater to different preferences. The Caramel Latte excels in providing a lively sound profile and medium resistance, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a more tactile typing experience. In contrast, the Mannan Pipefish focuses on ease and comfort, appealing to those who prioritize a lightweight feel and a neutral sound environment. Ultimately, the choice between the two will come down to personal preferences regarding sound and feel, but either option can deliver a satisfying typing journey within its unique context.
Conclusion
To conclude, choosing between the Huano Caramel Latte and the KTT Mannan Pipefish linear switches ultimately comes down to your typing preferences and intended use. If you enjoy a slightly heavier keystroke that offers a bit more feedback, the Caramel Latte, with its medium-light bottom-out force of 55 grams, may be a better fit for you. Its bright and clacky sound profile can enhance your typing experience, especially if you like auditory feedback while typing or gaming. Conversely, if you prefer a lighter touch and seek a switch that minimizes finger fatigue during prolonged usage, the Mannan Pipefish is an excellent choice. With a bottom-out force of just 45 grams, this switch allows for effortless typing, making it ideal for casual typists who prioritize comfort and ease of use over sound feedback. Its polished design ensures smooth key travel, further emphasizing a strain-free typing experience. Ultimately, consider your typing style and environment—whether you thrive on a more dynamic auditory experience or desire a subdued, comfortable session—as these factors will guide your selection between these two compelling options.
Mentioned in this article
