United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Gateron CJ vs. Gateron Jupiter Banana

An in-depth look at the Gateron CJ and the Gateron Jupiter Banana switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When looking at the Gateron CJ, a linear switch, and the Gateron Jupiter Banana, a tactile switch, it becomes evident that they offer unique experiences for mechanical keyboard users. The CJ stands out for its smooth push feel and higher-pitched clacks, making it a favorite among those seeking a linear switch. On the other hand, the Jupiter Banana is praised for its high-precision molds and softer backlight effects, providing a tactile feedback that is consistent and satisfying. While the CJ is described as 'Chirpy', 'Neutral', 'Mild', 'Low-pitched', and 'Thocky', the Jupiter Banana is categorized as 'Polished', 'High-pitched', 'Creamy', and 'Resonant'. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal to different preferences, making it important to consider the specific qualities that matter most to you. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

50g

Actuation force

59g

Bottom-out force

60g

Bottom-out force

69g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

No

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Proprietary INK blend

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated

Spring

Spring steel

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Gateron CJ and the Gateron Jupiter Banana, we see that the CJ utilizes a proprietary INK blend for the top housing, while the Jupiter Banana features a polycarbonate top housing. Both materials offer a high-pitched sound profile, with the INK blend leaning towards a more satisfying and clacky sound, while the polycarbonate creates a sharper and crisper sound. Aesthetically, the polycarbonate housing of the Jupiter Banana is translucent, making it ideal for use with RGB lighting, while the INK blend of the CJ does not offer this feature.

Moving on to the bottom housing, the CJ utilizes a POM housing, resulting in a deeper and more muted sound profile, while the Jupiter Banana features a nylon bottom housing for a fuller and deeper sound. The use of POM in the CJ and nylon in the Jupiter Banana showcase the different sound characteristics that can be achieved through varying housing materials. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, creating a rounder sound profile compared to the more solid and less absorbent POM material.

Overall, while the top and bottom housing materials differ between the Gateron CJ and the Gateron Jupiter Banana, both switches offer unique sound profiles based on the qualities of their respective housing materials. The choice between INK blend and polycarbonate for the top housing, as well as POM and nylon for the bottom housing, will ultimately impact the sound and feel of typing on these switches. Whether you prefer a more clacky and high-pitched sound from the INK blend of the CJ or a sharper and crisper sound from the polycarbonate of the Jupiter Banana, both switches offer distinct qualities that cater to different preferences.

Weight

The Gateron CJ linear switch and the Gateron Jupiter Banana tactile switch both fall within the medium range when it comes to actuation force and bottom out force. The CJ has a slightly lighter actuation force of 50 grams compared to the Jupiter Banana's 59 grams, while the bottom out force of the CJ is also lighter at 60 grams compared to the Jupiter Banana's 69 grams, making the Jupiter Banana a bit heavier overall. Those who prefer a lighter touch may lean towards the CJ switch, as it requires less force to trigger a keystroke and bottom out, making it ideal for extended typing sessions or gaming. However, for users who enjoy a more substantial typing experience with a stronger push feel, the Jupiter Banana with its heavier actuation and bottom out forces may be more suitable. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for typing feel and force requirements.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distance of the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Gateron Jupiter Banana tactile switch, it is clear that the CJ has a longer travel distance of 4 mm compared to the Jupiter Banana's 3.4 mm. The CJ's 4.0mm is more traditional, offering a deeper key press feel, while the Jupiter Banana's 3.4 mm provides a slightly shallower key press. Gamers may prefer the shorter travel distance of the Jupiter Banana for faster response times, while those who enjoy a more substantial key press may opt for the CJ. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and key press depth.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Gateron CJ has an MSRP of $6.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the CJ for $5.35.

The Gateron Jupiter Banana comes in at $2.80 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Gateron CJ linear switch is known for its chirpy and neutral sound profile, with a higher-pitched clack that sets it apart from other linear switches. On the other hand, the Gateron Jupiter Banana tactile switch offers a high-pitched and resonant sound profile, creating a sharp and crisp typing experience. Depending on personal preference, users can choose between the unique acoustic signature of the CJ or the immersive auditory experience of the Jupiter Banana.

When it comes to feel, the Gateron CJ linear switch is described as offering a mild typing experience, with a gentle feel that falls into a safe middle-ground zone. In contrast, the Gateron Jupiter Banana tactile switch provides a polished and creamy typing sensation, with a smooth and refined finish that results in reduced friction and smooth key travel. Whether one prefers the mild and approachable feel of the CJ or the silky sensation of the Jupiter Banana, both switches offer a satisfying typing experience.

In conclusion, the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Gateron Jupiter Banana tactile switch offer distinct sound and feel qualities that cater to different preferences. The CJ provides a chirpy sound and a mild feel, while the Jupiter Banana offers a high-pitched and resonant sound with a polished and creamy tactile feel. Ultimately, choosing between these switches will depend on individual preferences in sound, feel, and typing experience. Both switches provide high-quality performance, and one can expect a unique and enjoyable typing experience with either option.

Conclusion

In conclusion, when deciding between the Gateron CJ linear switch and the Gateron Jupiter Banana tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preferences and typing style. If you prefer a lighter bottom out force and enjoy a unique higher-pitched sound profile with a smooth push feel, the CJ linear switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force and value a strong return with softer backlight effects, the Jupiter Banana tactile switch could be more suitable. Consider your typing habits, sound preference, and desired typing experience to make the best decision for your mechanical keyboard setup.

Mentioned in this article