United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Aflion Cloudy Shadow vs. Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown

An in-depth look at the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown offer unique typing experiences that cater to different preferences. The Cloudy Shadow's linear switches are praised for their neutral sound signature and bouncy feel, thanks to extended springs that provide a balanced typing experience with a 63.5g bottom-out force. On the other hand, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown's tactile switches offer a subtle tactile sensation with a gentle bump that enhances typing flow, along with a frosted light diffuser for vibrant RGB lighting. While the Cloudy Shadow is low-pitched and mild, the G Pro 3.0 Brown is easy-to-press and stepped, appealing to users seeking a quieter but responsive typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

55g

Bottom-out force

63.5g

Bottom-out force

63g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

20mm double-stage spring

Spring

20.5mm lengthened stainless steel spring

Housing materials

In comparing the housing materials of the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown, it is evident that both switches use polycarbonate for the top housing. Polycarbonate is known for creating a sharp, higher-pitched sound profile and is ideal for switches with RGB lighting due to its translucency. This means that both switches will likely have a clear, resonant sound when typing, giving a similar auditory experience to users.

However, when looking at the bottom housing material, the Cloudy Shadow uses nylon while the G Pro 3.0 Brown also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to polycarbonate. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when typing. Therefore, despite both switches having different top housings, the use of nylon for the bottom housing ensures that users will experience a similar, deep sound profile when typing on either switch.

Overall, the housing materials of the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown contribute to their unique sound profiles. The Cloudy Shadow's combination of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing creates a clear, resonant sound with a deep tone. On the other hand, the G Pro 3.0 Brown, with its polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing, also provides a sharp sound profile with a fuller, rounder tone. Despite the differences in materials used for the top and bottom housings, both switches offer a satisfying typing experience with distinct sound characteristics.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown tactile switch, it is evident that the Cloudy Shadow has a bottom out force of 63.5 grams, which is slightly heavier than the G Pro 3.0 Brown's 63 grams. However, the actuation force of the G Pro 3.0 Brown at 55 grams is lighter than that of the Cloudy Shadow, which is unknown. Overall, the Cloudy Shadow provides a more substantial typing experience with a heavier bottom out force, while the G Pro 3.0 Brown offers a lighter actuation force for longer typing sessions. Both switches deliver similar results in terms of bottom out force, making them suitable for individuals who prefer a medium feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for typing experience and force requirements.

Travel distance

The Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it shorter than the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown tactile switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. The Cloudy Shadow's shorter travel distance may appeal to gamers looking for faster response times, while the G Pro 3.0 Brown's longer travel distance may provide a more satisfying key press for those who prefer a deeper feel. Overall, the choice between the two switches ultimately depends on personal preference for travel distance and the desired typing or gaming experience.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Aflion Cloudy Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Cloudy Shadow for $3.91.

The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown has an MSRP of $2.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Brown for $2.77.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch offers a low-pitched and neutral sound profile, providing a more bass-heavy and mellow tone without being overly loud or distracting. On the other hand, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown tactile switch has a medium-high pitch that delivers a satisfying auditory feedback, adding an extra layer of joy to your typing sessions. While the Cloudy Shadow emphasizes a more subdued sound experience, the G Pro Brown brings a bit more excitement to the table with its audible feedback.

When it comes to the feel of the switches, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch offers a mild typing experience with a bouncy feel due to the extended springs, providing a balanced and approachable typing experience for users. On the other hand, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown tactile switch is described as easy-to-press, offering gentle resistance during key presses and requiring minimal force to activate. This light actuation force makes typing effortless and comfortable, enhancing the overall typing experience by providing a responsive and low-impact feel. Both switches fall into the category of mild switches, ensuring a safe middle-ground zone that is suitable for a wide range of users.

In conclusion, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch focuses on providing a neutral sound profile and a bouncy typing feel, while the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown tactile switch offers a medium-high pitch sound and an easy-to-press tactile experience. Depending on your preferences for sound and feel, both switches offer unique qualities that cater to different typing preferences. Ultimately, choosing between the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown will depend on whether you prioritize a more subdued and balanced typing experience or a more audible and responsive tactile feel.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Brown tactile switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prefer a switch with a slightly heavier bottom-out force for a more balanced typing experience with a bouncy feel, the Cloudy Shadow may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you are looking for a switch with a medium bottom-out force that offers a subtle tactile sensation and enhances your RGB lighting experience, the G Pro 3.0 Brown could be the better option. Ultimately, choose the switch that aligns with your typing preferences and desired sound and feel characteristics for an optimal typing experience.

Mentioned in this article