Aflion Cloudy Shadow vs. KTT Laurel
An in-depth look at the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the KTT Laurel switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and KTT Laurel both offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences. The Cloudy Shadow linear switch stands out for its neutral sound signature and bouncy feel, thanks to extended springs that provide a balanced typing experience with a 63.5g bottom-out force. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel linear switch features a full POM housing, short travel, and long pole design, striking a balance between responsiveness and comfort with a subtly low-pitched sound profile. While the Cloudy Shadow offers a mild and neutral typing experience, the Laurel provides a snappier feel. Ultimately, the decision between these two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
43g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.80 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
20mm double-stage spring
Spring
22m spring
Housing materials
The Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the KTT Laurel both feature unique housing materials that contribute to their overall sound profiles. The Cloudy Shadow utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which produces a sharper and crisper sound profile with higher-pitched tones, ideal for users who prefer a more distinct typing experience. In contrast, the Laurel's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound, offering a softer and more subdued typing experience. While both housings serve their purpose well, the Cloudy Shadow's polycarbonate top housing may be better suited for those who enjoy a brighter and more resonant sound, whereas the Laurel's POM top housing is perfect for users seeking a smoother and quieter typing experience.
In terms of bottom housing materials, the Cloudy Shadow features a nylon bottom housing, known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer plastic composition. This results in a duller and rounder sound that may appeal to users looking for a more substantial typing feel. On the other hand, the Laurel's POM bottom housing also produces a similar deep and muted sound, offering a consistent typing experience throughout the switch. While both switches have different bottom housing materials, they deliver comparable sound profiles that cater to individuals with varying preferences for sound and feel.
In summary, the choice between the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the KTT Laurel ultimately comes down to personal preference for sound and typing experience. The Cloudy Shadow's combination of polycarbonate top housing and nylon bottom housing provides a unique blend of sharpness and depth in sound, offering a distinctive typing experience. In contrast, the Laurel's POM top and bottom housing materials deliver a consistent and pleasingly muted sound profile, ideal for users who prefer a softer and more understated typing feel. Both switches offer high-quality housing materials that contribute to their overall performance, ensuring a satisfying typing experience for users with different preferences.
Weight
When comparing the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch, it is evident that the actuation and bottom out forces differ between the two. The Cloudy Shadow has an actuation force of None grams, whereas the Laurel requires 43 grams to actuate. In terms of bottom out force, the Cloudy Shadow measures at a heavier 63.5 grams, while the Laurel is lighter at 50 grams. The Cloudy Shadow provides a more substantial typing experience with its medium-heavy bottom out force, ideal for those seeking a stronger push feel. On the other hand, the Laurel offers a lighter actuation force, making it easier to type for extended periods of time, suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the Aflion Cloudy Shadow linear switch and the KTT Laurel linear switch is identical, with both switches having a travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that when pressing down on a key with either switch, users will experience the same level of key travel. This similarity in travel distance ensures that users will get consistent results in terms of keypress feel and responsiveness. Therefore, whether using the Cloudy Shadow or the Laurel linear switch, users can expect a similar typing experience in terms of key travel distance.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Aflion Cloudy Shadow has an MSRP of $5.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Cloudy Shadow for $3.91.
The KTT Laurel has an MSRP of $4.42 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Laurel for $3.95.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, both the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the KTT Laurel linear switches offer a low-pitched profile, with the Cloudy Shadow having a neutral sound signature as well. This means that you can expect a more bass-heavy and mellow tone from both switches, providing a pleasant auditory experience during typing sessions. Keep in mind that the sound of a switch can also be influenced by factors such as the keyboard's construction and the keycaps used.
In terms of feel, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow is described as providing a mild typing experience, offering a gentle feel that falls in a safe, middle-ground zone suitable for a wide range of users. On the other hand, the KTT Laurel switch is noted for its snappy feel, implying a level of responsiveness that gives the typing experience a lively quality. This suggests that while the Cloudy Shadow offers a more approachable typing feel, the Laurel may appeal to those who prefer a more dynamic and responsive sensation while typing.
Overall, both the Aflion Cloudy Shadow and the KTT Laurel linear switches exhibit low-pitched sound profiles, making them suitable for users who enjoy a more bass-heavy and mellow typing experience. While the Cloudy Shadow provides a mild and gentle typing feel, the Laurel offers a snappier and more responsive sensation. Depending on your preference for typing feel, you can choose between the approachable nature of the Cloudy Shadow or the liveliness of the Laurel, ensuring a satisfying typing experience with either switch.
Conclusion
To sum up, if you are looking for a linear switch with a medium-heavy bottom-out force and a bouncy feel, the Aflion Cloudy Shadow would be the ideal choice for you. This switch offers a balanced typing experience with a neutral sound profile. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom-out force and a snappier feel, the KTT Laurel linear switch would be more suited to your preferences. The Laurel provides a perfect balance of responsiveness and comfort with a subtly low-pitched sound profile. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for bottom-out force, sound profile, and typing feel.
Mentioned in this article
