Gateron CM vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the Gateron CM and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gateron CM linear switch with the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, there are notable differences to consider. The Gateron CM switch stands out for its full nylon housing, which results in a richer and deeper sound signature compared to the Lotus V2. Equipped with an exceptional factory lube job, the CM promises a smooth typing experience that feels like gliding with each keystroke. Additionally, the CM's lengthened, dual-staged spring provides a bouncy typing sensation. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 doesn't have any specific features highlighted, making it a more mysterious option. If you prefer a buttery, bassy, and polished typing experience with a low-pitched and frictionless feel, the Gateron CM may be the ideal choice for you. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
55g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Dual-staged 20mm lengthened gold-plated spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The Gateron CM and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 both use different materials for their top and bottom switch housings. While the CM utilizes nylon for both its top and bottom housing, creating a deeper and fuller sound profile, the Lotus V2 opts for POM for both its top and bottom housing, resulting in a more muted and pleasing sound. Despite the different materials used, both switches offer a deeper sound profile due to the properties of nylon and POM, which absorb sound and create a duller, rounder sound compared to harder materials.
In terms of sound characteristics, the CM's nylon housing produces a more rounded and dull sound profile when typing on the switches. This is because nylon is a softer plastic that absorbs more sound, allowing for a deeper and fuller sound profile. On the other hand, the Lotus V2's POM housing results in a deeper and more muted sound profile, providing a unique and pleasing typing experience. Both materials offer distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences, with nylon offering a fuller sound and POM providing a more muted sound.
When it comes to the overall typing experience, the Gateron CM and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 showcase how different housing materials can impact the sound and feel of a switch. While the CM's nylon housing creates a deeper sound with a softer feel upon bottoming out, the Lotus V2's POM housing offers a more muted sound with a unique typing experience. Despite these differences, both switches deliver a satisfying typing experience that showcases the importance of housing materials in switch design. Ultimately, whether you prefer the deeper sound of nylon or the muted sound of POM, both switches offer distinct characteristics that can enhance your typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Gateron CM linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, it is clear that they have distinct differences. The Gateron CM has a heavier actuation force of 55 grams, while the Lotus V2 is lighter at 45 grams. The bottom out force of the Gateron CM is also heavier at 63.5 grams, whereas the bottom out force of the Lotus V2 is not provided. This means that the Gateron CM provides a more substantial typing experience with a heavier feel, while the Lotus V2 offers a lighter touch for longer typing sessions. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on individual preferences for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The Gateron CM linear switch has a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.4 mm. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances, which are becoming increasingly popular, especially among gamers looking for quicker response times. The difference in travel distance between the two switches is minimal, so the overall feel when pressing down on the keys may not be significantly different. However, for those who prefer a slightly deeper feel to their keystrokes, the Gateron CM switch with the longer travel distance may be more appealing. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference regarding key response and feel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron CM has an MSRP of $4.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the CM for $4.25.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Gateron CM linear switch stands out for its bassy, thocky, and low-pitched characteristics, providing a deep and rich sound profile during key presses. This switch offers a satisfying auditory experience with each keystroke, delivering a sense of depth and richness reminiscent of bass tones. On the other hand, details about the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch's sound profile are not provided, making it difficult to make a direct comparison in this aspect.
Moving on to the feel, the Gateron CM linear switch is described as buttery, polished, creamy, and frictionless, offering a smooth and effortless typing experience. The factory-lubed switches ensure reduced friction and smooth key travel, resulting in a seamless and uniform sensation with each keystroke. Conversely, information regarding the feel of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is not available, making it challenging to contrast the tactile experience between the two switches.
Considering the available information, the Gateron CM linear switch is praised for its bassy sound profile and buttery typing feel, making it a popular choice for those who prioritize both auditory and tactile feedback in their mechanical keyboard experience. While the subjective qualities of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch remain unknown, individuals seeking a switch with similar characteristics to the Gateron CM could potentially expect comparable results in terms of sound depth and smooth keystroke experience. Ultimately, the choice between these switches may depend on personal preference and specific requirements for sound and feel in a mechanical keyboard setup.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Gateron CM linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prioritize a medium-heavy bottom out force and enjoy a unique typing experience with a full nylon housing and a bouncy feel, then the Gateron CM switch may be the right choice for you. Additionally, if you appreciate a bassy, thocky, and low-pitched sound profile, along with a buttery, polished, creamy, or frictionless feel, the Gateron CM switch could enhance your typing enjoyment. On the other hand, if the bottom out force and sound profile are not as important to you, and you are looking for a different typing experience or sound characteristic not present in the descriptions provided for the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switch, that switch may also be worth considering. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preferences and typing style.
Mentioned in this article
