Gateron CM vs. Cherry MX Red
An in-depth look at the Gateron CM and the Cherry MX Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the Gateron CM and the Cherry MX Red mechanical keyboard switches, it is evident that both offer unique qualities that cater to different preferences. The CM stands out for its full nylon housing and impeccable factory lube job, resulting in a smooth and gliding typing experience with a rich sound signature. On the other hand, the MX Red from Cherry is known for its slightly heftier feel and deeper sound profile, providing a robust typing experience that is both responsive and satisfying. While the CM switch is described as 'buttery', 'bassy', and 'polished', the MX Red is characterized as 'thocky', 'low-pitched', and 'textured'. Both switches have their own strengths and appeal, making them suitable for various typing preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
55g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
63.5g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
pom
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Dual-staged 20mm lengthened gold-plated spring
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
Both the Gateron CM and Cherry MX Red switches use nylon as the material for their top and bottom housings. This choice of material results in a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing on these switches. Nylon is known for being a softer plastic that absorbs more sound than harder plastics, creating a duller and rounder sound overall. This means that users can expect a similar typing experience in terms of sound and feel from both the Gateron CM and Cherry MX Red switches.
Despite both switches utilizing nylon for their housing material, the Gateron CM and Cherry MX Red switches may differ in the overall feel and sound profile due to other factors such as spring weight or stem design. While nylon contributes to the sound profile of the switches, other components play a significant role in determining the overall typing experience. It is important to consider these additional factors when comparing and contrasting switches, as they can have a substantial impact on user preference and satisfaction.
Overall, the Gateron CM and Cherry MX Red switches offer a similar typing experience in terms of housing material. Both switches utilize nylon for their top and bottom housings, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. While the feel and sound of the switches may vary due to other factors, the nylon housing material creates a consistent typing experience in terms of the sound produced. Users can expect a tactile and satisfying typing experience from both the Gateron CM and Cherry MX Red switches, with the nylon housing contributing to the overall sound profile of the switches.
Weight
When comparing the Gateron CM linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch, the actuation force and bottom out force play a key role in determining the typing experience. The Gateron CM switch has a higher actuation force of 55 grams compared to the Cherry MX Red's 45 grams, making the CM switch feel slightly heavier to type on. In terms of bottom out force, the Gateron CM requires 63.5 grams, while the Cherry MX Red force is unknown. This means that the Gateron CM switch overall has a slightly heavier feel compared to the Cherry MX Red. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Cherry MX Red, while individuals seeking a more substantial typing experience may opt for the Gateron CM switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.
Travel distance
In comparing the travel distance of the Gateron CM linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch, it is clear that the CM has a shorter travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the MX Red has a longer travel distance of 4 mm. The difference of 0.4 mm may not seem like much, but it can have a significant impact on the feel and responsiveness of the switch. Gamers, in particular, tend to prefer shorter travel distances for quicker key presses and response times, making the CM switch a popular choice in that regard. However, some users may find the shorter travel distance to be too abrupt and prefer the more substantial feel of the MX Red switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style, with the shorter travel distance of the CM offering a faster response, while the longer travel distance of the MX Red providing a more deliberate key press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Gateron CM has an MSRP of $4.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the CM for $4.25.
The Cherry MX Red has an MSRP of $5.90 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the MX Red for $4.00.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the Gateron CM linear switch offers a bassy and thocky sound profile with a low-pitched tone, providing a deep and rich auditory experience during key presses. On the other hand, the Cherry MX Red linear switch also provides a thocky and low-pitched sound, creating a similar deep and satisfying sound profile. Both switches deliver a robust typing experience with a noticeable depth in sound, so users can expect comparable results in terms of sound quality.
Moving on to the feel, the Gateron CM linear switch is described as buttery, polished, creamy, and frictionless, offering a smooth and fluid typing experience with reduced friction and effortless key travel. In contrast, the Cherry MX Red linear switch is noted for having a textured feel, which may provide some users with a preference for a bit more friction in their typing experience. Despite this slight difference in texture, both switches aim to provide a comfortable typing sensation, ensuring users can enjoy a satisfying tactile experience with each keystroke.
In conclusion, the Gateron CM linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch offer distinct yet similar qualities in sound and feel. While the CM switch boasts a richer and bassier sound profile coupled with a buttery smooth feel, the MX Red switch provides a slightly heftier typing experience with a textured feel. Ultimately, both switches cater to users seeking a responsive and enjoyable typing journey, allowing them to find the perfect match based on their personal preferences for sound and feel.
Conclusion
To wrap up, when deciding between the Gateron CM linear switch and the Cherry MX Red linear switch, consider the factors that matter most to you. If you value a bouncy typing experience with a rich sound profile and smooth keystrokes, the Gateron CM linear switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heftier feel, deeper sound profile, and don't mind a textured typing experience, the Cherry MX Red linear switch could be more suitable. Both switches offer their own unique characteristics, so it ultimately comes down to personal preference and what feels best for your typing style. Make sure to test out both switches if possible to determine which one enhances your typing experience the most.
Mentioned in this article
