KTT Darling vs. HMX Lotus
An in-depth look at the KTT Darling and the HMX Lotus switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the KTT Darling and the HMX Lotus mechanical keyboard switches, both linear switches offer unique features that cater to different preferences. The KTT Darling is praised for its chewy and substantial typing sensation, along with a bouncy and springy responsiveness that adds to the overall experience. On the other hand, the HMX Lotus is known for its medium weight and bright, resonant sound, providing a super bouncy feeling with every keystroke. Both switches offer distinct qualities that may appeal to different users, depending on their preferences for typing feedback and sound. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
22mm single-staged spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the KTT Darling and the HMX Lotus, we can see that both switches utilize nylon as the material for their bottom housing. This means that typing on either switch will result in a deeper and fuller sound profile due to the softer nature of nylon. The absorption of sound by the nylon material creates a duller and rounder sound, enhancing the overall typing experience for the user. However, where the switches differ is in their top housing materials. The Darling features a polycarbonate top housing, which produces a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. This is because polycarbonate is a stiffer plastic that leads to a more clear and resonant sound. On the other hand, the Lotus's top housing is also made of nylon, providing a different typing experience with a deeper and fuller sound compared to the polycarbonate top housing of the Darling.
While the Darling's polycarbonate top housing creates a sharper and crisper sound profile, the Lotus's nylon top housing offers a deeper and fuller sound experience. The use of these different materials in the top housing affects the sound profile of each switch, catering to different preferences for sound when typing. In terms of aesthetics, the Darling's polycarbonate top housing is translucent, making it ideal for switches intended for use with RGB lighting. On the other hand, the Lotus's nylon top housing may not offer the same visual appeal as the polycarbonate top housing, but it still provides a unique typing experience with its deeper sound profile. The use of different housing materials in the top housing gives each switch its own distinct sound signature for users to enjoy.
Although both the KTT Darling and HMX Lotus utilize nylon for their bottom housing, giving them a similar sound profile, the differences lie in their top housing materials. The polycarbonate top housing of the Darling creates a sharper and crisper sound compared to the nylon top housing of the Lotus, which offers a deeper and fuller sound experience. This showcases how the choice of housing material can significantly impact the overall sound profile of a switch. Whether a user prefers a clear and resonant sound or a deeper and fuller sound, both switches provide options that cater to different preferences. Ultimately, the housing materials of these switches play a crucial role in determining the typing experience and sound quality for the user.
Weight
The actuation force of the KTT Darling linear switch is the same as that of the HMX Lotus linear switch, both being 45 grams. However, the bottom out force of the Darling is heavier at 53 grams compared to the Lotus's 50 grams. The Darling provides a medium-light typing experience, while the Lotus offers a lighter feel. Those who prefer a more substantial typing experience may lean towards the Darling due to its heavier bottom out force, while those who enjoy a lighter touch may opt for the Lotus. Both switches have the same actuation force, so for those who prioritize that aspect, they can expect similar results from either switch. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on individual preferences for typing feel and weight.
Travel distance
The KTT Darling linear switch and the HMX Lotus linear switch both have the same travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that when you press down on a key equipped with either switch, you will experience the same amount of key travel. Both switches offer a consistent feel and feedback due to their identical travel distances. Therefore, whether you choose the Darling or the Lotus, you can expect a similar typing experience in terms of key travel.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Darling has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Darling for $3.90.
The HMX Lotus has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus for $2.99.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Darling linear switch stands out for its clacky and high-pitched characteristics, delivering a sharp and resonant sound that adds to the overall typing experience. On the other hand, information on the sound profile of the HMX Lotus linear switch is not provided, so it is difficult to directly compare the two switches in this aspect. However, both switches are likely to provide a satisfying auditory feedback based on their respective descriptions.
When it comes to feel, the KTT Darling linear switch is known for its bouncy nature, offering a spring-like sensation with each keystroke that enhances the typing experience. Unfortunately, details on the tactile feel of the HMX Lotus linear switch are not available, making it challenging to make a direct comparison in terms of feel. Nevertheless, with the Darling being described as bouncy, it is safe to assume that the Lotus switch may also offer a similar level of responsiveness and feedback to the user.
In conclusion, the KTT Darling linear switch and the HMX Lotus linear switch both have unique qualities that cater to different preferences in mechanical keyboard switches. While the Darling excels in providing a satisfyingly bouncy and high-pitched typing sensation, the Lotus switch offers a super bouncy feeling with a bright, resonant sound. Ultimately, the choice between these switches would depend on individual preferences for sound and feel, ensuring that users can find the perfect switch to suit their typing style and preferences.
Conclusion
Therefore, when deciding between the KTT Darling linear switch and the HMX Lotus linear switch, consider the following factors. If you prefer a slightly heavier bottom out force and enjoy a typing experience that is both substantial and bouncy, with a pronounced high-pitched sound, the KTT Darling switch may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter switch that provides a super bouncy feeling with a bright, resonant sound, the HMX Lotus switch might be more suitable for your preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal typing style and the specific characteristics that appeal to you the most.
Mentioned in this article
