KTT Darling vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2
An in-depth look at the KTT Darling and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
The KTT Darling, a linear switch, stands out for its chewy and substantial typing sensation, coupled with a pronounced bounciness that adds a springy responsiveness to every keystroke. This switch delivers a resonant, high-pitched sound upon bottoming out, creating a unique blend of tactile and auditory feedback. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2, also a linear switch, does not have any specific standout features mentioned. While the Darling is described as 'Bouncy', 'Clacky', 'High-pitched', and 'Resonant', the Lotus V2 lacks any defining characteristics in the provided information. If you're looking for a keyboard switch that offers a unique typing experience with tactile and auditory feedback, the Darling may be the way to go. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
45g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
53g
Bottom-out force
N/A
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.40 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
POM
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Stainless steel
Spring
Stainless steel
Housing materials
The KTT Darling utilizes a polycarbonate top housing, which creates a sharp, high-pitched, and crisp sound profile. This material is known for its stiffness, which results in a clear and resonant sound. In contrast, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 features a POM top housing, which produces a deeper and more muted sound profile. Despite their differences, both materials offer unique sound qualities that cater to different preferences. The Darling's polycarbonate top housing is ideal for those who prefer a sharper sound, while the Lotus V2's POM top housing appeals to those looking for a deeper and softer sound experience.
On the bottom housing front, the Darling features a nylon bottom housing that produces a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon, being a softer plastic, absorbs more sound and creates a duller and rounder sound compared to other materials. Similarly, the Lotus V2 also utilizes a POM bottom housing, resulting in a deeper and more muted sound profile. Both switches offer a pleasing typing experience, with the Darling providing a fuller sound and the Lotus V2 offering a slightly more muted sound. Despite the difference in materials, both switches deliver a satisfying sound profile that caters to various typing preferences.
In terms of functionality, the differences in housing materials between the KTT Darling and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 affect the overall sound and feel of the switches. The qualities of the top and bottom housing materials influence the sound profile when pressing down on the switch and releasing a key. While the Darling's polycarbonate top housing creates a distinct sound when letting go of a key, the bottom nylon housing contributes to a deeper bottom-out sound. On the other hand, the Lotus V2's POM top and bottom housing work together to create a unique typing experience with a deeper and more muted sound overall. Despite their differences, both switches offer a quality typing experience that caters to various sound preferences.
Weight
The actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Darling linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch are both 45 grams, making them equally light in terms of weight. However, when it comes to the bottom out force, the Darling has a slightly heavier force of 53 grams compared to the Lotus V2, which is unknown. The Darling provides a medium-light typing experience with a bit of resistance, while the Lotus V2's bottom out force remains a mystery. For those who prefer a more substantial typing feel, the Darling may be the preferred choice. Ultimately, the actuation force and bottom out force play a significant role in determining the typing experience and preference of the user.
Travel distance
The KTT Darling linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. This means that the Darling has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Lotus V2. Both switches fall into the category of shorter travel distances, which are popular among gamers for faster response times. If you prefer a more responsive feel, the slightly shorter travel distance of the Lotus V2 may be more suitable for you. However, if you prefer a bit more depth in the feel of the switch, the Darling with its slightly longer travel distance could be the better choice. Ultimately, the decision between the two will come down to personal preference and what feels most comfortable to you during use.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The KTT Darling has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Darling for $3.90.
The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the KTT Darling switch offers a clacky and high-pitched experience, with a resonant sound profile that can be quite engaging for users seeking a crisp and sharp auditory feedback. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switch's sound profile is unknown. It is important to note that the sound of a switch is also influenced by factors such as the keyboard board and keycaps used, which can further alter the overall sound experience.
Moving on to the feel of the switches, the KTT Darling switch is described as being bouncy, providing a spring-like and lively tactile sensation that offers a significant rebound when pressed. Unfortunately, information regarding the tactile feel of the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switch is not available at this time. Users looking for a switch with a lively and responsive keystroke may find the bounciness of the Darling switch to be a defining characteristic in their typing experience.
In conclusion, the KTT Darling linear switch stands out for its chewy and substantial typing sensation, accompanied by a pronounced bounciness and a resonant, high-pitched sound profile. While information regarding the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switch's sound and feel qualities is currently unavailable, users seeking a similar typing experience to the KTT Darling may find comparable results with the Lotus V2 switch, depending on further testing of its subjective qualities. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches may come down to individual preference in terms of sound and feel, as well as other factors such as keyboard compatibility and personal typing style.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the KTT Darling linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, consider the following guidelines. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force and enjoy a typing sensation that feels chewy, substantial, and bouncy, with a resonant, high-pitched sound, then the KTT Darling may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if bottom out force is not a concern for you and you are looking for a switch with different characteristics yet to be disclosed, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 may be worth exploring further. Ultimately, your choice will depend on your personal preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
