United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

KTT Darling vs. Wuque Studio WS Onion

An in-depth look at the KTT Darling and the Wuque Studio WS Onion switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the KTT Darling and the Wuque Studio WS Onion both offer unique typing experiences. The KTT Darling, a linear switch, provides a chewy and substantial typing sensation with a pronounced bounciness that adds a springy responsiveness to each keystroke. On the other hand, the WS Onion, also a linear switch, features a buttery smooth keystroke feel and a crisp, responsive touch. The Darling is known for its bouncy and clacky high-pitched sound, while the WS Onion offers a more neutral and polished sound profile. Ultimately, both switches have their own strengths and appeal to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

45g

Actuation force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Bottom-out force

63.5g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Total travel

4.00 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Partial box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel

Spring

WS CL635 Gold Plated Stainless Spring

Housing materials

Both the KTT Darling and the Wuque Studio WS Onion utilize polycarbonate for their top housings, resulting in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. The stiffness of polycarbonate contributes to a clear and resonant sound, making it ideal for switches intended for RGB lighting. However, the key difference lies in their bottom housings: the Darling features a nylon bottom housing, which produces a deeper and fuller sound, while the WS Onion also utilizes nylon for its bottom housing, providing a similar sound profile as the Darling.

The nylon bottom housing of both the KTT Darling and the Wuque Studio WS Onion offers a classic switch housing material that enhances the typing experience with a deeper and fuller sound profile. Nylon's softer nature absorbs more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when typing on switches with nylon components. This similarity in material choice for the bottom housing ensures that both switches deliver a consistent sound profile that is more robust and satisfying for typists looking for a tactile experience.

Despite the differences in their bottom housings, the KTT Darling and the Wuque Studio WS Onion both leverage the unique qualities of polycarbonate in their top housings to enhance the sound profile of the switches. The split between the bottom and top housings allows each material to showcase its specific acoustic characteristics upon key press and release, maintaining a balance between a clear and resonant sound. Whether it's the stiffer polycarbonate for a sharper sound or the softer nylon for a fuller sound, both switches offer a dynamic typing experience that caters to a variety of preferences.

Weight

When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the KTT Darling linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, it is clear that the Darling is the lighter option with an actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 53 grams, while the WS Onion is the heavier option with a bottom out force of 63.5 grams. The actuation force for the WS Onion is unknown, making a direct comparison in this aspect difficult. Those who prefer a lighter touch may opt for the Darling, as it allows for longer typing sessions without fatigue. On the other hand, the WS Onion provides a more substantial typing experience with its heavier bottom out force, ideal for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Both switches offer different typing experiences, and users can choose based on their preference for actuation and bottom out force.

Travel distance

The KTT Darling linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, making it slightly shorter than the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, which has a travel distance of 4 mm. A difference of 0.5 mm may not seem significant, but for some users, it can make a noticeable impact on the typing experience. The Darling's shorter travel distance may appeal more to gamers looking for faster response times, while the WS Onion's longer travel distance could be favored by those who prefer a more substantial keypress feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference and typing style.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The KTT Darling has an MSRP of $4.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Darling for $3.90.

The Wuque Studio WS Onion has an MSRP of $7.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the WS Onion for $5.53.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the KTT Darling linear switch is known for its clacky and high-pitched sound profile, providing a sharp and resonant auditory experience. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch boasts a neutral sound profile, making it suitable for various environments and preferences. Depending on the user's preference for sound, the Darling will offer a more assertive and engaging typing experience, while the WS Onion will provide a more understated and balanced sound.

Moving on to feel, the KTT Darling linear switch is characterized by its bouncy feedback, giving each keystroke a lively and springy sensation. In contrast, the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch offers a buttery smooth keystroke feel, delivering a seamless and uniform typing experience. The polished finish of the WS Onion switch contributes to reduced friction and smoother key travel, enhancing the overall typing feel. Whether a user prefers a more lively and dynamic typing experience with the Darling or a luxurious and effortless feel with the WS Onion, both switches excel in providing a satisfying tactile feedback.

Overall, the KTT Darling linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch present users with distinct qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the Darling excels in delivering a bouncy and resonant typing experience with a pronounced sound profile, the WS Onion offers a buttery smooth keystroke feel and a neutral sound profile. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on individual preferences for sound, feel, and typing experience. Users can expect a high level of satisfaction and performance from both switches, ensuring a premium typing experience regardless of their selection.

Conclusion

In summary, when choosing between the KTT Darling linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Onion linear switch, consider the factors of bottom out force, sound profile, and typing feel. If you prefer a medium-light bottom out force and enjoy a chewy and substantial typing sensation with a pronounced bounciness and high-pitched, resonant sound, then the Darling switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force and seek a buttery smooth keystroke feel with a crisp and neutral sound profile, then the WS Onion switch could be more suitable for your needs. Ultimately, your decision should be based on personal preferences for typing experience and sound feedback.

Mentioned in this article