United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Durock Daybreak vs. KTT Hyacinth

An in-depth look at the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Hyacinth switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Hyacinth mechanical keyboard switches, both being linear switches, some notable differences and similarities can be observed. The Durock Daybreak switch offers a solid 67g actuation force, providing a heavier typing experience ideal for those who prefer a more significant touch. Its quiet operation makes it suitable for environments where noise reduction is important. On the other hand, the KTT Hyacinth switch stands out with its 3.5mm travel distance, aiming to provide a more comfortable typing experience by avoiding the hard bottoming-out sensation common in switches with longer stems. While the Daybreak is described as 'Polished', 'Muted', 'Low-pitched', the Hyacinth is categorized as 'Neutral', 'Silky', 'Subtle'. Overall, each switch offers unique qualities that cater to different preferences and needs. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

67g

Bottom-out force

56g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated spring

Spring

22mm spring

Housing materials

Both the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Hyacinth feature polycarbonate top housings, which create a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffness of the material. This results in a clear and resonant sound when typing on these switches. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that plan to incorporate RGB lighting. However, despite using the same material for the top housing, subtle differences in design and construction may affect the overall sound and feel of the switches.

In terms of bottom housing materials, both the Daybreak and the Hyacinth utilize nylon, known for producing a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to harder plastics. The softer nature of nylon absorbs more sound, resulting in a duller and rounder sound when typing on these switches. This emphasizes the importance of the bottom housing in influencing the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch. While both switches share this material for the bottom housing, variations in design and thickness may impact the overall typing experience.

Overall, the housing materials of the Durock Daybreak and the KTT Hyacinth play a crucial role in defining the sound profile and feel of each switch. While both switches use polycarbonate for the top housing and nylon for the bottom housing, differences in design and construction may lead to variations in the typing experience. It is important to consider how each material contributes to the overall sound and feel of the switch when determining which keyboard switch is best suited for individual preferences.

Weight

The Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Hyacinth linear switch have differences in their actuation force and bottom out force. The Daybreak has an actuation force of None grams, while the Hyacinth has a force of 45 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Daybreak requires 67 grams, making it medium-heavy, whereas the Hyacinth requires 56 grams, which is considered medium-light. This means that the Daybreak will provide a more substantial typing experience with a heavier push feel, while the Hyacinth will offer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions. Both switches offer varying levels of resistance to cater to different preferences, with the Daybreak being the heavier option and the Hyacinth being the lighter one. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the user's preference for actuation force and bottom out force.

Travel distance

The Durock Daybreak linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the KTT Hyacinth linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm. In this case, the Hyacinth has a slightly shorter travel distance compared to the Daybreak. The shorter travel distance of the Hyacinth may be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times, while the slightly longer travel distance of the Daybreak may provide a more satisfying key press for those who prefer deeper actuation. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on personal preference for travel distance and the type of typing or gaming experience desired.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Durock Daybreak has an MSRP of $6.87 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Daybreak for $5.41.

The KTT Hyacinth has an MSRP of $4.03 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Hyacinth for $3.75.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Durock Daybreak linear switch is known for its muted and low-pitched sound profile, providing a quieter typing experience that is ideal for noise-sensitive environments. On the other hand, the KTT Hyacinth linear switch is described as having a neutral sound, suitable for various purposes without being too loud or too soft. Both switches offer different auditory experiences, with the Daybreak focusing on a quieter tone while the Hyacinth aims for a balanced sound profile.

When it comes to the feel of the switches, the Durock Daybreak is known for its polished finish, resulting in a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel. In contrast, the KTT Hyacinth offers a silky typing experience with subtle resistance, emphasizing smoothness and minimizing resistance when pressing and releasing keys. Both switches provide a comfortable typing feel, but the Daybreak leans towards a polished finish while the Hyacinth prioritizes a silky smooth experience.

Taking all available information into account, the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Hyacinth linear switch offer distinct qualities in terms of both sound and feel. The Daybreak provides a heavier touch with a muted and low-pitched sound, while offering a polished typing experience. On the other hand, the Hyacinth features a 3.5mm travel distance and a single-stage elongated spring, leading to a neutral sound profile and a silky smooth typing feel. Ultimately, the choice between these switches would depend on the individual's preferences for actuation force, sound profile, and typing experience.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the KTT Hyacinth linear switch, consider your preference for typing experience. If you enjoy a heavier touch and quieter operation, the Daybreak with its 67g bottom out force may be the better choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter touch and a switch designed to prevent harsh bottoming-out experiences, the Hyacinth with its 56g bottom out force and 3.5mm travel distance could be the ideal pick. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel, so your decision should be based on your personal typing preferences and the environment in which you will be using the keyboard.

Mentioned in this article