United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Durock Daybreak vs. Jerrzi Lotus V2

An in-depth look at the Durock Daybreak and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When comparing the Durock Daybreak linear switch with the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, both offer a smooth typing experience preferred by many enthusiasts. The Daybreak stands out with its 67g actuation force, providing a satisfying heft for those who prefer a more substantial touch while maintaining quiet operation, making it ideal for noise-sensitive environments. In contrast, the Lotus V2 does not have any standout features mentioned but offers a different typing feel. The Daybreak is categorized as 'Polished', 'Muted', 'Low-pitched', while the Lotus V2 is not categorized. Choosing between these two switches may come down to personal preference and typing style. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

N/A

Actuation force

45g

Bottom-out force

67g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Total travel

3.80 mm

Total travel

3.40 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Box

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Top housing material

POM

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

POM

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Gold-plated spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the Durock Daybreak and the Jerrzi Lotus V2, one significant difference is seen in their top housings. The Daybreak's polycarbonate top housing offers a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile, while the Lotus V2's POM top housing produces a deeper and more muted sound. This distinction can greatly impact the overall typing experience, as the sound and feel of a switch are closely linked to its housing material.

On the other hand, both switches feature a bottom housing made of nylon or POM, respectively. Nylon is known for creating a deeper and fuller sound profile, while POM offers a pleasing and unique sound on the deeper side. Despite the differences in sound characteristics, both nylon and POM are softer plastics that absorb more sound, resulting in a rounder and less resonant sound compared to harder materials such as polycarbonate.

In conclusion, while the Durock Daybreak and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 may have different housing materials in their top and bottom components, the overall typing experience will be influenced by a combination of these materials. The choice between polycarbonate and POM for the top housing will impact the sound when pressing and releasing a key, while the nylon or POM bottom housing will affect the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch. Ultimately, each housing material brings its unique qualities to the overall typing experience, providing users with a variety of options to suit their preferences.

Weight

In comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, it is evident that they offer different weighting options. The Daybreak has a bottom out force of 67 grams, making it a medium-heavy switch in terms of typing pressure. On the other hand, the Lotus V2 has an actuation force of 45 grams, providing a lighter touch for typing. While the actuation force of the Daybreak is not specified, it can be assumed that it may require a similar amount of force as the Lotus V2 due to both switches being linear. When considering weight, it is important to note that lighter switches like the Lotus V2 may be preferred for extended typing sessions or gaming, while heavier switches like the Daybreak may offer a more substantial typing experience for those who prefer a stronger push feel. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on the individual's typing style and preference for actuation and bottom out forces.

Travel distance

The Durock Daybreak linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch has a travel distance of 3.4 mm. The Daybreak offers a slightly longer travel distance compared to the Lotus V2. A shorter travel distance can provide a faster response time, making it preferred by gamers looking for quick reactions. On the other hand, a longer travel distance can give a more satisfying tactile feedback for those who prefer a deeper key press. Both switches fall within the range of shorter travel distances which are popular in the market today. Ultimately, the choice between the two will depend on personal preference and the specific typing or gaming experience desired.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Durock Daybreak has an MSRP of $6.87 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Daybreak for $5.41.

The Jerrzi Lotus V2 has an MSRP of $4.00 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Lotus V2 for $3.59.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Durock Daybreak linear switch stands out for its muted and low-pitched characteristics, offering a quieter typing experience with a deeper tone compared to other mechanical switches. On the other hand, the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch lacks specific descriptions in terms of sound qualities, making it difficult to directly compare with the Daybreak. However, both switches are likely to provide a relatively quiet typing experience depending on the overall setup of the keyboard, including factors such as the case and keycap material used.

Moving on to the feel of the switches, the Daybreak linear switch is praised for its polished finish, delivering a smooth and refined typing sensation with reduced friction and effortless key travel. In contrast, there is no specific information available about the feel of the Lotus V2 linear switch. Based on the lack of descriptors, it is uncertain how the Lotus V2 compares in terms of overall typing feel to the Daybreak. However, given the general qualities of linear switches, both are expected to offer a consistent and smooth keystroke.

In conclusion, the Durock Daybreak linear switch offers a heftier typing experience with a quiet operation, muted sound profile, and polished feel for enhanced smoothness and reduced friction. While specific information about the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch is lacking, it is likely to provide a similar quiet typing experience with potentially different sound and feel characteristics. Ultimately, the choice between these switches will depend on personal preference for typing experience and overall sound profile desired.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Jerrzi Lotus V2 linear switch, you should choose the Daybreak if you prefer a medium-heavy bottom out force of 67 grams and a quieter typing experience. The Daybreak's muted and low-pitched sound profile, along with its polished feel, make it a great option for those looking for a more refined and professional typing experience. On the other hand, if you prefer a lighter bottom out force or want a switch with an emphasis on a different sound or feel, then the Lotus V2 may be more suited to your preferences. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches will depend on your personal typing preferences and the specific characteristics you value most in a mechanical keyboard switch.

Mentioned in this article