Durock Daybreak vs. Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile
An in-depth look at the Durock Daybreak and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When considering mechanical keyboard switches, the choice between linear and tactile switches can greatly impact your typing experience. The Durock Daybreak linear switch offers a solid 67g actuation force, providing a weightier touch while maintaining a quiet operation, perfect for noise-sensitive environments. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile switch presents a 70g bump for a more pronounced tactile feedback, along with a thocky sound from nylon housings, enhancing the typing experience with a satisfying click. Both switches have their distinguishing features - the Daybreak being polished, muted, low-pitched, while the WS Heavy Tactile is accented, bouncy, clacky, high-pitched, invigorating, resonant, sharp, and snappy. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
N/A
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
67g
Bottom-out force
70g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Total travel
3.20 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
POM
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
Gold-plated spring
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the Durock Daybreak and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile, it is evident that both switches utilize nylon for their bottom housing. This material choice provides a deeper and fuller sound profile, as nylon is known for absorbing more sound than harder plastics, resulting in a duller and rounder sound. However, the Daybreak distinguishes itself with a polycarbonate top housing, offering a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile. Polycarbonate's stiffness leads to a more clear and resonant sound, making it ideal for switches utilizing RGB lighting.
On the other hand, the WS Heavy Tactile opts for a nylon top housing, aligning with the classic choice for switch housing material. This decision contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile compared to the Daybreak's polycarbonate top housing. While both switches share a nylon bottom housing, the split in housing materials showcases how each material impacts the overall sound profile differently. The bottom housing's characteristics will be more prominent in the bottom-out sound and feel when the switch is pressed, while the top housing will have more influence on the sound produced upon releasing a key.
Ultimately, the choice between the Durock Daybreak and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile comes down to personal preference in sound profile. Those seeking a crisper and resonant sound may prefer the Daybreak with its polycarbonate top housing, while individuals looking for a deeper and fuller sound may opt for the WS Heavy Tactile with its nylon top housing. Both switches offer unique qualities based on their housing materials, showcasing the impact that different materials can have on the overall typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch, it is clear that the Daybreak is lighter in terms of actuation force at None grams, while the WS Heavy Tactile requires 45 grams. In terms of bottom out force, the Daybreak is still lighter at 67 grams compared to the WS Heavy Tactile's 70 grams. Both switches fall within the medium-heavy range when it comes to bottom out force. Those who prefer a lighter typing experience may lean towards the Daybreak for longer typing sessions, while those looking for a more substantial typing feel may prefer the WS Heavy Tactile. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches will come down to personal preference in terms of actuation force and bottom out force.
Travel distance
The Durock Daybreak linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm, while the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch has a travel distance of 3.2 mm. The Daybreak offers a slightly longer travel distance compared to the WS Heavy Tactile. In terms of preference, a shorter travel distance like that of the WS Heavy Tactile may be favored by gamers seeking faster response times. On the other hand, those who enjoy a more substantial keypress experience may prefer the longer travel distance provided by the Daybreak. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches would depend on personal preference for keypress depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The Durock Daybreak has an MSRP of $6.87 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Daybreak for $5.41.
The Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile comes in at $3.50 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the Durock Daybreak linear switch is renowned for its muted and low-pitched characteristics, providing a softer and quieter typing experience compared to other switches. On the other hand, the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch is known for its clacky, high-pitched, and resonant sound profile, offering a sharp and crisp auditory feedback that can be quite engaging. Both switches offer distinct sound profiles that cater to different preferences, with the Daybreak leaning towards a more subdued sound and the WS Heavy Tactile emphasizing a more vibrant and lively tone.
When it comes to feel, the Daybreak switch is described as polished, offering a smooth and refined typing experience with reduced friction and sleek key travel. On the other hand, the WS Heavy Tactile switch is characterized by its bouncy, accented, invigorating, sharp, and snappy feel, providing a tactile feedback that is pronounced and responsive. These qualities create a typing sensation that is engaging and immersive, giving users a satisfying tactile experience with each keystroke.
Overall, the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch offer unique qualities in terms of sound and feel. The Daybreak switch provides a quieter and more polished typing experience, while the WS Heavy Tactile switch delivers a more lively and tactile feedback. Depending on personal preferences and typing style, users can choose between the two switches to achieve the desired sound and feel for their mechanical keyboard setup. Whether selecting the Daybreak for a more subdued experience or opting for the WS Heavy Tactile for a more engaging feedback, users can expect a quality typing experience with either switch option.
Conclusion
In closing, when deciding between the Durock Daybreak linear switch and the Wuque Studio WS Heavy Tactile tactile switch, it ultimately comes down to your personal preference in typing experience. If you are looking for a heavier actuation force with a quieter sound profile, the Daybreak may be the switch for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a more pronounced tactile bump, immersive resistance, and a "thocky" sound, the WS Heavy Tactile switch could be the better choice. Consider your typing style, sound preference, and desired level of tactility when making your decision. Ultimately, both switches offer unique qualities that can enhance your typing experience, so choose the one that best suits your needs and preferences.
Mentioned in this article
