United States: Free shipping on orders over $49

Huano Elf vs. KTT F2

An in-depth look at the Huano Elf and the KTT F2 switches—which one is the best fit for you?

Overview

When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the Huano Elf and KTT F2 both stand out as linear options, each offering unique characteristics that cater to different user preferences. The Huano Elf is celebrated for its innovative POK top housing, which enhances acoustics and produces a rich, deep sound signature, providing a medium-light feel that creates a satisfying typing experience. This switch is perfect for those who value a pronounced auditory feedback combined with comfort during long typing sessions. On the other hand, the KTT F2 switches carve out their niche with a distinct hollow sound signature, setting themselves apart in the auditory realm. Additionally, their medium-light weightiness ensures comfort without compromising on responsiveness, while a lightly textured surface adds a tactile nuance to every stroke. This makes the KTT F2 particularly appealing for users who appreciate a soft touch accompanied by subtle feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Technical specifications

Actuation force

42g

Actuation force

43g

Bottom-out force

N/A

Bottom-out force

53g

Pre-travel

2.00 mm

Pre-travel

1.90 mm

Total travel

3.60 mm

Total travel

3.50 mm

Factory lubed

Yes

Factory lubed

Yes

Stem construction

Standard

Stem construction

Standard

Stem material

POM

Stem material

POM

Top housing material

POK

Top housing material

Polycarbonate

Bottom housing material

Nylon

Bottom housing material

Polycarbonate

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Mount type

PCB (5-pin)

Spring

Stainless steel spring

Spring

Stainless steel

Housing materials

The housing materials of the Huano Elf and KTT F2 switches showcase distinct characteristics that influence their sound profiles and overall tactile experience. The Huano Elf utilizes POK (polyketone) for its top housing, which boasts a low coefficient of friction and exceptional durability. With a wear resistance significantly superior to POM and shock resistance that outstrips both Nylon and POM, the POK material contributes to a smooth, clacky feel that many enthusiasts appreciate. In contrast, the KTT F2 features a polycarbonate top housing, which is known for producing a sharper, higher-pitched sound profile. Polycarbonate’s stiffer nature results in a clearer resonance, making it a preferred choice for users who favor the audible feedback of their switches, particularly under RGB lighting circumstances due to its translucency.

When examining the bottom housing materials, the differences between the two switches are compelling. The Huano Elf is equipped with a nylon bottom housing, renowned for its ability to absorb sound and create a deeper, fuller audio experience. This softer plastic serves to dampen the overall noise, resulting in a rounder sound when the switch bottoms out. In contrast, the KTT F2 bottom housing is also constructed from polycarbonate, thus emulating the sharper sound profile found in its top housing. As the stiffer material reflects sound rather than absorbing it, the result is clear and pronounced audio. Therefore, the KTT F2's combination of polycarbonate materials contributes to a consistent, crisp sound that resonates throughout both the actuation and release phases of key presses.

Ultimately, the differences in material choices between the Huano Elf and KTT F2 significantly impact their acoustic properties and tactile feedback. While the Elf's use of POK and nylon fosters a smooth and deep sound experience, the KTT F2’s polycarbonate top and bottom housings create an entirely different auditory signature, one that is sharper and more resonant. Nevertheless, both switches can yield exceptional results; for instance, a POK top housing paired with a polycarbonate bottom would create a unique interplay of sound characteristics, balancing the smoothness of the former with the clarity of the latter. Thus, enthusiasts can understand how the unique attributes of each material contribute to the overall experience, allowing for tailored choices based on personal preferences in sound and feel.

Weight

When comparing the Huano Elf linear switch and the KTT F2 linear switch, notable differences arise in their actuation force and bottom out force. The Huano Elf features an actuation force of 42 grams, whereas the KTT F2 requires a slightly heavier actuation force of 43 grams. This minor difference indicates that the Elf switch may be more suitable for users who prefer a lighter touch, making it ideal for extended typing sessions, whereas the F2's slightly heavier actuation could offer a more substantial feel that some typists might find preferable. In terms of bottom out force, the F2 has a measurable bottom out force of 53 grams, while the Elf's bottom out force remains unknown. Consequently, the F2 is the heavier option despite being classified as medium-light, while the Elf is the lighter choice with its confirmed actuation force. If the bottom out forces were similar, users could expect a comparable typing experience; however, the difference in the F2's defined bottom out force introduces a clearer distinction in the overall feedback between the two switches.

Travel distance

When comparing the travel distances of the Huano Elf linear switch and the KTT F2 linear switch, the Elf boasts a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the F2 has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This means that the Elf is designed to provide a deeper keystroke experience compared to the F2, which can appeal to users who prefer a more pronounced depth while typing or gaming. On the other hand, the F2's shorter travel distance may offer quicker response times, aligning with the preferences of gamers who favor a more rapid actuation. Therefore, if you lean towards more responsiveness in your keystrokes, the KTT F2 would be the better option. In contrast, for those who enjoy that extra heft in their keystrokes, the Huano Elf is more suitable. While both switches are relatively close in travel distance, the slight difference may influence user experience depending on their individual preferences.

Price comparison

Which switch is more bang for your buck?

The Huano Elf has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Elf for $3.29.

The KTT F2 comes in at $3.90 per 10 switches.

Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.

That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.

Typing experience

When it comes to sound, the Huano Elf linear switch is known for producing a deep sound signature thanks to its POK top housing, which enhances its acoustics. This results in a pleasing auditory experience that can be quite satisfying for typists who appreciate a rich sound profile. In contrast, the KTT F2 linear switch has a distinct hollow sound signature, providing a unique auditory experience that sets it apart from many traditional switches. Its sound is characterized as neutral and subdued, producing a moderate sound profile that is less pronounced yet still noticeable. Ultimately, both switches might appeal to users who prefer a mild auditory presence, but the Elf's deeper signature contrasts with the F2's softer, more delicate noise.

In terms of feel, the Elf switch offers a medium-light typing experience, which strikes a balance between resistance and ease of use, making it a suitable option for both casual typing and intense gaming sessions. Meanwhile, the KTT F2 switch presents a feathery feel that is exceptionally light to press, significantly reducing finger fatigue during long periods of use. With a mild and subtle resistance, the F2 offers a gentle typing experience, where the characteristics are all pleasant and approachable. Overall, while both switches provide a comfortable feel, the Elf leans towards a balanced blend of engagement, whereas the F2 focuses more on an effortless touch.

By examining these qualities, it is clear that both the Huano Elf and KTT F2 linear switches present distinct yet complementary options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. The Elf's deep sound and medium-light feel make it a well-rounded choice, while the F2's unique hollow sound and ultra-light, feathery actuation cater to those who seek comfort and subtlety in every keystroke. Those who prefer either switch can expect a generally satisfying typing experience, but the specific characteristics will resonate differently with each typist. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you prioritize a deeper sound presence or a lighter, more feather-like feel.

Conclusion

To conclude, your choice between the Huano Elf and KTT F2 linear switches ultimately hinges on your personal preferences and the specific typing experience you desire. If you prioritize enhanced acoustics and a satisfying sound signature, the Huano Elf might be your go-to option. Its deep sound profile coupled with an overall medium-light feel can elevate your typing experience, making it a great choice if you plan to immerse yourself in a rich auditory environment while typing or gaming. On the other hand, if you seek a balance between sound and feel, the KTT F2 linear switch would be a better fit. Its distinctively hollow yet subdued sound produces a gentle audio feedback that is unobtrusive, making it ideal for shared spaces or long hours of typing without overwhelming the surroundings. The lightly textured feel of the F2 adds another layer of comfort, especially if you're engaged in extensive typing tasks, whether that be work or play. Therefore, reflect on your needs, whether they're auditory or tactile, and choose the switch that resonates most with your personal typing style and environment.

Mentioned in this article