Huano Elf vs. Bsun Tomcat

Overview

When it comes to choosing the right mechanical keyboard switch, the Huano Elf and the Bsun Tomcat are two solid options for enthusiasts seeking a linear feel. The Huano Elf switch is particularly celebrated for its POK top housing, which enhances acoustics and delivers a deep sound profile, combined with a medium-light actuation force that provides a satisfying typing experience. In contrast, the Bsun Tomcat switch is defined by its Ly stems, which contribute to an exceptionally smooth keypress, paired with a resonant sound profile that many users find appealing. Both switches offer unique characteristics that cater to different preferences; the Elf may be the better choice for users who prioritize acoustic richness, while the Tomcat excels for those who value smoothness in each stroke. However, let’s dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

Huano Elf Linear

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

$2.99 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

The housing materials used in the switches of the Huano Elf and the Bsun Tomcat exhibit distinct differences, particularly in their top housing components. The Elf utilizes a polyketone (POK) top housing known for its exceptionally smooth performance and remarkable durability. With a coefficient of friction at 0.04 and impressive wear resistance over 14 times stronger than POM, the POK material enhances the overall typing experience, contributing to a smooth and clacky sound profile that many enthusiasts appreciate. In contrast, the Tomcat employs polycarbonate for its top housing, which is recognized for its stiffness and ability to produce a crisper, higher-pitched sound. The resulting sound profile benefits from the clear and resonant characteristics of polycarbonate, particularly when used in conjunction with RGB lighting. This contrast highlights how material choice affects not only the tactile feel but also the auditory experience of each switch.

On the other hand, both the Huano Elf and the Bsun Tomcat feature nylon as their bottom housing material, establishing a commonality that allows them to share similar acoustic properties. Nylon is revered for its softer composition, which absorbs sound more effectively than harder materials, resulting in a deeper and fuller auditory experience during use. This similarity in bottom housing contributes to an overall consistency in sound profile, as pressing down on either switch generates that desirable roundness and depth. The uniformity in using nylon for the bottom housing means that, despite the differences in their top components, both switches will exhibit a comparable sound character at the bottom-out stage.

In conclusion, while the Huano Elf's POK and the Bsun Tomcat's polycarbonate top housings provide distinctly different auditory experiences, the use of nylon in their bottom housings allows for a shared quality that enhances their sound profiles. The POK material's durability and smoothness contribute to the overall feel of the Elf, while the polycarbonate enhances the clarity of the Tomcat's sound. Ultimately, if one switches between these devices, the unique characteristics of the different top materials will resonate throughout the experience, although the familiar depth produced by nylon will tether both switches within a similar sound range. Thus, while their top housings diverge in function and performance, the shared nylon in the bottom ensures a consistent foundation for sound, allowing users to enjoy a fulfilling typing experience regardless of their choice.

Weight

When comparing the Huano Elf linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, it is evident that they cater to different preferences in typing feel. The Elf features a lighter actuation force of 42 grams, while the Tomcat has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams. This difference indicates that the Elf may be more suitable for users who favor a softer touch for extended typing or gaming sessions, whereas the Tomcat provides a bit more resistance, appealing to users who prefer a more substantial push feel. Additionally, the Tomcat's bottom out force is specified at 54 grams, which emphasizes its heavier overall feel when bottoming out. In contrast, the Elf's bottom out force remains unknown, which means that while both switches can offer different typing experiences, the specific resistance felt when bottoming out with the Elf cannot be directly compared to the Tomcat's 54 grams. Overall, those seeking a lighter typing experience may gravitate towards the Huano Elf, while those who appreciate a firmer touch may find the Bsun Tomcat to be the better choice.

Travel distance

Both the Huano Elf linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch exhibit the same travel distance of 3.6 mm, indicating that users will experience a similar feel when pressing down on keys equipped with either switch. This equal travel distance means that both switches will provide a comparable keystroke experience in terms of depth and feedback, allowing for a consistent performance when typing or gaming. Since both switches feature this identical travel distance, users can expect to achieve similar results regardless of which switch they choose.

Price comparison

Typing experience

In terms of sound, the Huano Elf linear switch is known for its deep sound signature resulting from its POK top housing, which enhances acoustics to produce a rich auditory experience. This switch brings a resonant sound that many users find satisfying during extended typing sessions. On the other hand, the Bsun Tomcat linear switch also delivers a resonant sound profile, which adds a distinctive character to the typing experience. While both switches provide a pleasing auditory experience, the exact sound quality may vary based on factors like the keyboard construction and keycap material used, leading to unique results despite their similarities.

When it comes to feel, the Elf switch is noted for its medium-light actuation force, which contributes to a comfortable and enjoyable typing experience. This makes the Elf feel responsive without being overly strenuous on the fingers. Conversely, the Tomcat switch, featuring Ly stems, is celebrated for its super smooth operation, enabling a fluid keystroke that can enhance typing speed and comfort. While the Elf offers a satisfying medium-light resistance, the Tomcat's smoothness can provide a different tactile sensation that many users appreciate for fast-paced typing.

In conclusion, both the Huano Elf and Bsun Tomcat linear switches present unique auditory and tactile qualities that cater to specific preferences. While the Elf's deep sound and medium-light feel offer a distinct typing experience, the Tomcat's resonant profile and silky smoothness bring their own advantages. Ultimately, whether you choose the Elf or the Tomcat, both switches share a commitment to delivering satisfying performance, ensuring a rewarding mechanical keyboard experience regardless of which switch you opt for.

Conclusion

To sum up, when deciding between the Huano Elf linear switch and the Bsun Tomcat linear switch, you’ll want to consider your personal preferences for both sound and feel. If you prioritize a unique acoustic experience alongside a medium-light typing feel, the Elf switch may be your best choice. Its POK top housing enhances acoustics, giving you a satisfying and deep sound signature that makes your typing feel enjoyable and tactile. On the other hand, if you’re looking for a smoother typing experience with a more defined resistance, the Tomcat switch would be a more suitable option. With its medium-light bottom-out force and Ly stems, it provides effortless keystrokes and a resonant sound profile that can enhance your typing rhythm. Ultimately, your choice will depend on whether you favor the acoustic richness and feel of the Elf or the smoothness and defined response of the Tomcat.

Mentioned in this article

Huano Elf Linear

$3.50

$3.29 per 10

Learn more

Bsun Tomcat Linear

$2.99 per 10

Learn more