HMX EMO vs. Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red
An in-depth look at the HMX EMO and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the HMX EMO linear switch to the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch, it's important to note that both offer a smooth typing experience. The HMX EMO switch provides a lively and clacky feel with a feather-light 46g bottom-out force, making it effortless and bouncy to type on. On the other hand, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switch strikes a balance between responsiveness and ease of use with its medium-light actuation force. Additionally, the G Pro Red features a frosted light diffuser for brighter RGB lighting effects and a satisfying auditory experience. While both switches have their unique features that may appeal to different preferences, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
46g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
20.5mm lengthened stainless steel spring
Housing materials
Both the HMX EMO and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red feature polycarbonate top housings, which are known for creating a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile due to the stiffness of the material. This results in a clear and resonant sound when typing on these switches. Additionally, the translucency of polycarbonate makes it ideal for switches that incorporate RGB lighting, enhancing the overall aesthetic appeal of the keyboard. While both switches share this common feature in their top housing material, the differences in their bottom housing materials will likely impact the overall sound and feel of typing on the switches.
On the other hand, the EMO incorporates a nylon bottom housing, which contributes to a deeper and fuller sound profile when typing. Nylon is a softer plastic compared to polycarbonate, absorbing more sound and creating a duller and rounder sound experience. This different bottom housing material may result in a contrasting feel and sound when compared to the G Pro 3.0 Red, which also features a nylon bottom housing. The split qualities between the top and bottom housings of each switch will influence the overall typing experience, with the bottom housing having more of an impact on the bottom-out sound and feel, while the top housing affects the sound when releasing a key.
While both switches may have similar polycarbonate top housings, the differences in their bottom housing materials, nylon for the EMO and G Pro 3.0 Red, will likely provide distinct typing experiences. The choice of housing materials in switches plays a crucial role in determining the sound profile, feel, and overall user experience. The softer nylon material of the bottom housing in both switches will contribute to a deeper and fuller sound, while the stiffness of polycarbonate in the top housing will create a sharp and clear sound quality. Understanding the impact of these housing materials is essential for keyboard enthusiasts looking to customize their typing experience.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the HMX EMO linear switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch, it is clear that the EMO is the lighter option with an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 46 grams. On the other hand, the G Pro 3.0 Red has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. Both switches provide a light typing experience, but the G Pro 3.0 Red requires a slightly stronger push. For those who prefer a lighter touch for longer typing sessions or gaming, the EMO may be the better choice. However, for individuals who enjoy a more substantial typing feel, the G Pro 3.0 Red offers a bit more resistance. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for actuation and bottom out forces.
Travel distance
The HMX EMO linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5 mm, while the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch has a travel distance of 4 mm. In terms of travel distance, the G Pro 3.0 Red has a slightly longer distance compared to the EMO. The G Pro 3.0 Red's 4 mm travel distance is more traditional, providing a deeper key press feel, which may be preferred by some users. On the other hand, the EMO's shorter 3.5 mm travel distance offers a quicker response time, making it a popular choice among gamers. Ultimately, the decision between the two switches comes down to personal preference, with the EMO offering a shorter travel distance for faster input and the G Pro 3.0 Red providing a longer travel distance for a more pronounced key press.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EMO has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EMO for $2.79.
The Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red has an MSRP of $2.80 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the G Pro 3.0 Red for $2.77.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
In terms of sound, the HMX EMO switch offers a unique, lively sound that can be described as crisp and clacky. On the other hand, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switch is known for its neutral sound profile, striking a balance between moderate actuation force requirement and sound level. The sound produced by both switches can be further influenced by factors such as the keyboard build and keycap material chosen.
When it comes to feel, the HMX EMO switch provides a bouncy and satisfying typing experience with a feather-light 46g bottom-out force. In contrast, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switch offers a creamy, smooth typing sensation due to its factory-lubed construction. Additionally, the G Pro Red switch falls into the mild, polished, and silky categories, ensuring a gentle typing experience with reduced friction and smooth key travel.
In conclusion, while the HMX EMO and Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switches offer distinct sound and feel qualities, both switches provide a pleasant typing experience. The EMO switch excels in delivering a clacky sound and bouncy feel, while the G Pro Red switch offers a smooth and creamy typing experience with a medium-light actuation force. Depending on personal preferences and typing style, either switch can provide a satisfying and enjoyable mechanical keyboard experience. Ultimately, choosing between these switches will come down to individual preference for sound, feel, and other factors such as budget and lighting preferences.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the HMX EMO linear switch and the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red linear switch, consider the typing experience you prefer. If you are looking for a lively, clacky feel with a light 46g bottom-out force and smooth, bouncy typing experience, the HMX EMO switch may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a budget-friendly option with a medium-light 50g bottom-out force, a smooth typing experience, and bright RGB lighting effects, the Gateron G Pro 3.0 Red switch could be more suitable. Ultimately, your preference for typing feel, sound profile, and budget will guide your decision on which linear switch to choose.
Mentioned in this article
