HMX EMO vs. TTC Neptune
An in-depth look at the HMX EMO and the TTC Neptune switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When comparing the HMX EMO and the TTC Neptune mechanical keyboard switches, both offer distinct typing experiences that cater to different preferences. The HMX EMO switch is praised for its lively and clacky feel, coupled with a feather-light 46g bottom-out force, providing an effortless and bouncy typing experience. On the other hand, the TTC Neptune stands out for its innovative internal structure that results in a smooth and almost frictionless glide, with a unique tactile sensation akin to chewy delights like mochi or tapioca pearls. While the EMO switch offers a satisfying and smooth typing experience, the Neptune switch provides a textured pleasure with a muted sound signature. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
41g
Bottom-out force
46g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
3.80 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
POM
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
Lengthened 21.5mm spring
Housing materials
In comparing the housing materials of the HMX EMO and the TTC Neptune, we can see that both switches utilize polycarbonate in their top housing. This material choice results in a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile for both switches. However, the EMO's polycarbonate top housing is particularly beneficial for RGB lighting due to its translucency, while the Neptune's POM top housing creates a deeper and more muted sound profile. This difference in sound profiles may appeal to different preferences among keyboard enthusiasts.
On the other hand, when it comes to the bottom housing, the EMO features a nylon bottom housing while the Neptune utilizes a polycarbonate bottom housing. The use of nylon in the EMO's bottom housing creates a deeper and fuller sound profile due to its softer nature that absorbs more sound. In contrast, the polycarbonate bottom housing of the Neptune contributes to a sharper, higher-pitched, and crisper sound profile, similar to its top housing. This showcases how different housing materials can impact the overall sound and feel of a switch.
Overall, the choice of housing materials in a switch can have a significant impact on the typing experience and sound profile. While both the HMX EMO and TTC Neptune utilize polycarbonate in their top housing, the differences in their bottom housing materials lead to varying sound profiles. The EMO's nylon bottom housing provides a deeper and fuller sound, while the Neptune's polycarbonate bottom housing contributes to a sharper and clearer sound. Understanding these differences allows keyboard enthusiasts to choose the switch that best suits their preferences for typing feel and sound.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the HMX EMO linear switch and the TTC Neptune linear switch, it is evident that both switches fall on the lighter side in terms of force requirements. The EMO has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 46 grams, slightly lighter than the Neptune which has an actuation force of 41 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. While the EMO is slightly lighter in both categories, the overall differences are minimal. For those who prefer a lighter typing experience, either switch would likely provide a comfortable feel. However, for those who enjoy a bit more resistance for a more substantial typing experience, the slight difference in force may be noticeable. Ultimately, both switches offer a light actuation and bottom out force, providing a smooth typing experience for users.
Travel distance
The travel distance of the HMX EMO linear switch is 3.5 mm, while the TTC Neptune linear switch has a travel distance of 3.8 mm. In this case, the Neptune has a slightly longer travel distance compared to the EMO. The shorter travel distance of the EMO may appeal to those who prioritize quick response times, such as gamers. On the other hand, the longer travel distance of the Neptune may provide a more substantial keypress feel for those who prefer a more noticeable depth when typing or gaming. Ultimately, choosing between the two would depend on personal preference regarding travel distance and the desired typing experience.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EMO has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EMO for $2.79.
The TTC Neptune has an MSRP of $7.99 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Neptune for $5.09.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the HMX EMO switch has a distinct clacky and lively sound profile, creating a satisfying typing experience that may be more noticeable in a quieter environment. On the other hand, the TTC Neptune switch is characterized by a low-pitched, muted, and subdued sound, offering a more refined and unobtrusive auditory ambiance during typing sessions. The choice between the two switches will depend on personal preference for sound, with the EMO providing a more pronounced auditory feedback and the Neptune delivering a quieter typing experience suitable for shared spaces.
In terms of feel, the HMX EMO switch offers a bouncy and effortlessly smooth typing experience with a feather-light 46g bottom-out force, providing a tactile and responsive keypress. In contrast, the TTC Neptune switch boasts a unique "matte" feel, combining a smooth and frictionless glide with a springy resistance reminiscent of chewy delights like mochi or tapioca pearls. This fusion creates a textured pleasure with every keystroke, ensuring swift and effortless typing. Whether one prefers the buttery and gummy sensation of the Neptune or the polished and mild feel of the EMO, both switches offer a satisfying typing experience that caters to different preferences in keypress feedback.
In conclusion, the HMX EMO and TTC Neptune switches offer distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and feel. While the EMO provides a lively and clacky typing experience with a feather-light bottom-out force, the Neptune introduces a unique "matte" feel that merges smoothness with a springy resistance. Depending on personal preference for sound and feel, both switches offer a range of tactile and auditory feedback options for mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. Ultimately, choosing between the two switches will come down to individual preferences and the specific typing experience one desires.
Conclusion
To sum up, when deciding between the HMX EMO linear switch and the TTC Neptune linear switch, consider the specific qualities and preferences you have for your keyboarding experience. If you value a lively and bouncy typing feel with a lighter bottom-out force, the HMX EMO switch may be the ideal choice for you. On the other hand, if you prioritize a harmonious balance between a smooth glide and springy resistance, along with an ultralight design for swift typing, the TTC Neptune switch could be more suited to your needs. Ultimately, your decision should be based on the unique sound and feel characteristics that align best with your typing preferences.
Mentioned in this article
