HMX EMO vs. Gateron Type A
An in-depth look at the HMX EMO and the Gateron Type A switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to mechanical keyboard switches, the choice between the HMX EMO and the Gateron Type A can be a tough one. The HMX EMO is known for its lively and clacky feel, boasting a feather-light 46g bottom-out force that offers a smooth and satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the Gateron Type A from Sillyworks' "Project Rehash" is praised for its innovative approach to traditional travel distances and factory lubing techniques, providing a medium-weight switch with a sound signature that leans towards the deeper side of the sound spectrum. Each switch has its own unique qualities that may appeal to different preferences. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
40g
Actuation force
50g
Bottom-out force
46g
Bottom-out force
55g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.50 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
Ly
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Top housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
20mm single-stage spring
Housing materials
The housing materials of the HMX EMO and the Gateron Type A switches offer distinct qualities that affect the overall sound profile and feel of the switches. The EMO features a polycarbonate top housing, which produces a sharper, higher-pitched sound compared to the Type A's nylon top housing, which creates a deeper and fuller sound profile. The stiffer nature of polycarbonate results in a more clear and resonant sound, while the softer nylon absorbs more sound, leading to a duller and rounder sound. In terms of aesthetics, the clear polycarbonate housing of the EMO is ideal for those who plan to use RGB lighting, adding a visually appealing element to the switch.
While both the EMO and Type A switches have nylon bottom housings, they also exhibit differences in sound profiles. The softer nylon material of the bottom housing in both switches contributes to a deeper and fuller sound when typing. Although the bottom housing has more of an impact on the bottom-out sound and feel of the switch, the top housing plays a significant role in the sound when releasing a key. This split in housing materials allows for a more nuanced typing experience, with each housing material contributing distinct characteristics to the overall sound profile and feel of the switches.
Overall, the choice between the EMO and Type A switches comes down to personal preference in sound profile and feel. The polycarbonate top housing of the EMO creates a sharper and crisper sound, ideal for those who prefer a more distinct typing experience. On the other hand, the nylon top housing of the Type A offers a deeper and fuller sound, which may be preferred by users looking for a more mellow typing experience. Both switches utilize nylon bottom housings, ensuring a consistent depth and fullness in sound when typing. Ultimately, the housing materials of the switches play a crucial role in shaping the overall typing experience and can cater to different preferences in sound and feel.
Weight
When comparing the actuation force and bottom out force of the HMX EMO linear switch and the Gateron Type A linear switch, it is evident that the EMO switch is lighter in both aspects. The EMO switch has an actuation force of 40 grams and a bottom out force of 46 grams, making it a light switch overall. On the other hand, the Type A switch has a higher actuation force of 50 grams and a bottom out force of 55 grams, which places it in the medium-light category. The lighter actuation and bottom out forces of the EMO switch make it ideal for those who prefer a lighter typing experience for extended periods of time, such as during work or gaming sessions. In contrast, the heavier actuation and bottom out forces of the Type A switch cater to individuals who prefer a more substantial typing feel. Both switches offer distinct experiences due to their differences in actuation and bottom out forces, allowing users to choose based on their personal preferences for typing.
Travel distance
The HMX EMO linear switch has a travel distance of 3.5mm, making it shorter than the Gateron Type A linear switch, which has a travel distance of 4mm. The EMO switch offers a more shallow keypress experience, which may be preferred by gamers looking for faster response times. On the other hand, the Type A switch provides a deeper feel with its longer travel distance, which some users may find more satisfying for typing purposes. Ultimately, the choice between the two switches will come down to personal preference regarding keypress depth and responsiveness.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EMO has an MSRP of $3.49 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EMO for $2.79.
The Gateron Type A comes in at $4.70 per 10 switches.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When it comes to sound, the EMO switch has a unique lively and clacky feel, whereas the Type A switch offers a more neutral or subdued sound profile, leaning towards the deeper end of the spectrum. The EMO switch may produce a more satisfying and bouncy typing experience due to its factory-lubed design, while the Type A switch provides a more moderate sound signature, suitable for various purposes. The choice of keycaps and keyboard can also affect the sound of the switches.
In terms of feel, the EMO switch is known for its feather-light 46g bottom-out force, offering an effortless and smooth typing experience. On the other hand, the Type A switch is positioned as the ideal compromise for those seeking a medium-weight switch, although specific details on the feel are unknown. Both switches may offer a satisfying typing experience, but the EMO switch may provide a more bouncy and clacky feel compared to the Type A switch.
In conclusion, the HMX EMO and Gateron Type A switches provide distinct subjective qualities in terms of sound and potentially feel. The EMO switch is characterized by a lively and clacky sound, along with a feather-light bottom-out force for a bouncy typing experience, while the Type A switch offers a more neutral or subdued sound profile and a medium-weight feel. Depending on personal preferences and typing habits, users may choose between these switches for a typing experience that suits their needs. Ultimately, both switches can deliver a satisfactory typing experience, with slight differences in sound and potentially feel.
Conclusion
In summary, when deciding between the HMX EMO linear switch and the Gateron Type A linear switch, consider the factors of bottom out force, sound, and feel. If you prefer a lighter actuation force and a lively, clacky feel, the HMX EMO with its 46g bottom out force may be the right choice for you. On the other hand, if you prefer a slightly heavier actuation force and a sound signature leaning towards the deeper side, the Gateron Type A with its 55g bottom out force could be more suitable. Whether you prioritize a bouncy typing experience or a compromise with a medium-weight switch, both the EMO and Type A have their unique characteristics to cater to different preferences. Ultimately, your decision should be based on your personal preference for typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
