HMX EVA vs. KTT MoonRosa

Overview

When it comes to selecting the ideal mechanical keyboard switch, enthusiasts often weigh various factors like typing feel, sound signature, and overall performance. The HMX EVA switch is a standout linear option that draws inspiration from the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01, offering a resonant sound signature combined with a uniquely silky smooth typing experience. In contrast, the KTT MoonRosa is another linear switch that prides itself on its all-POM construction, providing a buttery smooth typing feel alongside a neutral sound profile. While the EVA switch is celebrated for its resonant sound, ideal for those who enjoy a bit of auditory feedback, the MoonRosa’s mild, low-pitched, and easy-to-press characteristics might appeal to those seeking a more understated experience. Ultimately, both switches cater to different preferences, making the choice between them highly personal. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.

By the numbers

HMX EVA Linear

KTT MoonRosa Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

$4.88 per 10

Learn moreLearn more

Housing materials

When comparing the housing materials of the HMX EVA and the KTT MoonRosa, notable differences emerge that ultimately influence the sound profile and tactile experience each switch offers. The EVA incorporates a nylon top and bottom housing, which is recognized for its softer properties. This results in a deeper and fuller sound, as the nylon material adeptly absorbs sound waves. The sound profile derived from its nylon composition lends itself to a nice, rounded auditory experience during typing, characterized by a satisfying bottom-out sound and a muted release. This harmonious quality of the EVA’s nylon seems to align with its intended use for enthusiasts seeking a rich acoustic environment during their typing sessions.

Conversely, the KTT MoonRosa utilizes POM for both its top and bottom housings. POM, or polyoxymethylene, delivers an appealing sound profile that also leans towards the deeper end, but with a distinct character slightly different from nylon. While both materials yield a relatively muted auditory experience, the POM's unique formulations can create a sound that is more pronounced in a particular frequency range, giving each keystroke a signature clarity. Additionally, the rigid properties of POM may result in a different tactile feedback compared to nylon, which can affect overall typing sensation and preference for some users who enjoy a firmer touch.

Despite the differences in materials used in the top and bottom housings of each switch, both the EVA and MoonRosa aim toward achieving rich acoustic results. The EVA's nylon housings contribute to a fuller sound, with a particularly soft touch that both absorbs and diffuses sound. Meanwhile, the KTT MoonRosa’s POM housing also achieves a muted sound profile that is pleasing in its own right. When pressed, the qualities of the bottom housing predominately impact the overall sound and feel, regardless of the specific material used. Thus, typists may find satisfaction in both switches, as they each achieve a satisfying performance; the EVA leans towards a deeper, rounded sound while the MoonRosa offers a uniquely crisp experience thanks to the properties of POM, showcasing how different materials can converge in functionality.

Weight

When comparing the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT MoonRosa linear switch, both exhibit light actuation and bottom out forces, catering to users who prefer a softer typing experience. The EVA switch has an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, while the MoonRosa features a slightly lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 45 grams. This makes the MoonRosa the lighter option, appealing to those seeking comfort during prolonged typing or gaming sessions. In contrast, the heavier EVA switch might be favored by users who enjoy a more substantial push feel. Despite their differences, both switches deliver similar overall results for users looking for light actuation, making them excellent choices for those who prioritize ease of use over a heavier tactile feedback.

Travel distance

The HMX EVA linear switch features a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the KTT MoonRosa linear switch has a slightly shorter travel distance of 3.5 mm. This indicates that the EVA switch travels 0.1 mm further than the MoonRosa, offering a more pronounced feel when pressing down on the key. For those who appreciate a more substantial depth and a less abrupt response, the EVA switch would be the preferred choice. Conversely, gamers looking for rapid actuation and quick response times may prefer the MoonRosa switch, as its shorter travel distance can facilitate faster key presses. Ultimately, the subtle difference in travel distance between the two switches can influence the typing experience, making each suitable for different user preferences.

Price comparison

Typing experience

The HMX EVA linear switch is characterized by its resonant sound signature, providing a unique auditory experience that distinguishes it from more common switches. This switch's sound is enriched by an inherent richness that can resonate pleasantly when typed upon, drawing a certain attention to its auditory feedback. On the other hand, the KTT MoonRosa boasts a low-pitched and neutral sound signature, which offers a mellow and bass-heavy tone that can be more subdued in comparison. The MoonRosa's sound profile is less likely to distract during use, favoring an overall smoother and more controlled audio experience, which can be appealing for those who prefer a quieter typing environment.

In terms of feel, the HMX EVA offers a silky smooth typing experience that engages typists with its seamless key presses. However, the precise texture of the feel is not elaborated upon in the context provided, leaving some ambiguity about its tactile characteristics. Conversely, the MoonRosa switch is described as providing a mild and easy-to-press experience, ensuring that the actuation is gentle and effortless, resulting in reduced finger fatigue over extended sessions. This makes the MoonRosa exceptionally approachable, appealing to typists who desire a balanced and forgiving typing experience.

When considering the overall qualities of both switches, the HMX EVA and KTT MoonRosa seem to cater to different preferences. While the EVA focuses on a resonant auditory experience paired with a silky feel, the MoonRosa emphasizes a neutral sound with a mild and easy-to-press feel to enhance comfort and control. Therefore, although these switches offer distinct experiences, both have merits that can create satisfying typing experiences, allowing users to prioritize either auditory or tactile preferences.

Conclusion

To conclude, the choice between the HMX EVA and the KTT MoonRosa linear switches ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing habits. If you are drawn to a unique aesthetic and are looking for a smoother typing experience with a resonant sound signature, the HMX EVA switch might be the right pick for you. Its slightly heavier bottom-out force at 48 grams still maintains a light typing feel, making it a good option for those who enjoy a touch of feedback while typing. However, if you're seeking an experience that blends buttery smoothness with a low-pitched sound profile, the KTT MoonRosa switch stands out with its all-POM construction. The MoonRosa's 45 grams bottom-out force and its mild, easy-to-press characteristics make it especially suitable for long typing sessions where comfort is paramount. Ultimately, if you prioritize a visually distinctive switch with a more resonant typing experience, go for the HMX EVA; if ease of use and a mellow tone are more to your liking, the KTT MoonRosa could be your best bet.

Mentioned in this article

HMX EVA Linear

$3.50

$2.99 per 10

Learn more

KTT MoonRosa Linear

$4.88 per 10

Learn more