HMX EVA vs. KTT Phalaenopsis
An in-depth look at the HMX EVA and the KTT Phalaenopsis switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to choosing a mechanical keyboard switch, the HMX EVA and KTT Phalaenopsis each offer unique attributes that cater to different typing preferences and styles. The HMX EVA, inspired by the iconic colors of Evangelion Unit-01, is celebrated for its resonant sound signature and silky smooth keystroke feel, making it an excellent choice for those who favor a linear switch that’s both feathery and clacky, promoting a quiet yet satisfying typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Phalaenopsis stands out with its beautiful translucent design and a tactile force of 50g, delivering a pronounced bump that enhances the typing sensation while minimizing finger fatigue thanks to a light actuation force of just 37g. This switch is perfect for users who appreciate feedback with every keystroke, as it offers a delightful and engaging typing experience. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
37g
Bottom-out force
48g
Bottom-out force
50g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Partial box
Stem material
T2
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
Plate (3-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
22mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The HMX EVA and KTT Phalaenopsis exhibit notable differences in their housing materials, which significantly influence the auditory characteristics and tactile experiences of the switches. The EVA utilizes nylon for both its top and bottom housings. Nylon is celebrated for its softer properties, resulting in a deeper and fuller sound profile. This material essentially absorbs more sound, creating a duller and rounder auditory experience when typing. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis employs polycarbonate, a stiffer and more resonant material for both top and bottom housings. This choice results in a sharper and higher-pitched sound profile that is clear and crisp, redefining the user’s auditory feedback during typing.
The variations in housing materials also impact the switches' overall aesthetic appeal. The Phalaenopsis's use of polycarbonate allows for translucency, which is particularly beneficial for users who want to utilize RGB lighting. The clear housing not only enhances the illumination effects but also contributes to the vividness of the colors projected. On the contrary, while nylon does not possess the same translucent qualities, its durability and traditional appeal may attract users who appreciate a classic design aesthetic without the necessity of lighting features. Therefore, when choosing between the two, the decision often hinges on whether the user prioritizes acoustics or visual enhancements alongside functionality.
Despite the differences in materials, it is important to recognize how each switch offers distinct advantages based on their respective designs. In scenarios where users desire a blend of both characteristics, it can be beneficial to mix and match these materials within the same ecosystem. For example, adopting a nylon base with a polycarbonate top can create a unique typing experience that elicits the fullness of nylon at the bottom, paired with the clarity of a polycarbonate sound profile at the top. This dual-material approach allows users to explore a wider range of auditory and physical sensations, enabling them to tailor their switches to suit individual preferences in sound and feel.
Weight
When comparing the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, we observe some nuanced differences in their actuation and bottom out forces. The EVA switch has an actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, while the Phalaenopsis features a slightly lighter actuation force of 37 grams and a bottom out force of 50 grams. Both switches are considered light, which makes them suitable for extended typing sessions or gaming marathons. The EVA switch requires a bit more force to register a keystroke compared to the Phalaenopsis, while the Phalaenopsis has a slightly heavier bottom out force. Overall, the Phalaenopsis is the lighter option in terms of actuation, while the EVA is marginally heavier in terms of actuation force. This distinction would appeal to users seeking different tactile experiences—where the EVA provides a more substantial feel during typing, the Phalaenopsis may benefit those who prefer a lighter touch.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distances of the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch, it is clear that the EVA switch boasts a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Phalaenopsis switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This difference makes the EVA switch the shorter option, which may appeal to those who favor quicker response times often preferred by gamers. On the other hand, the Phalaenopsis, with its longer 4 mm travel, offers a more pronounced tactile experience that some users may find more satisfying and less abrupt. Therefore, if one prioritizes responsiveness and speed, the HMX EVA would be the better choice, while those seeking a deeper feel in their keystrokes might gravitate towards the KTT Phalaenopsis.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EVA has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EVA for $2.99.
The KTT Phalaenopsis has an MSRP of $4.73 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Phalaenopsis for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
The sound profile of the HMX EVA linear switch is characterized by a clacky signature, producing sharp, bright, and percussive sounds with each keystroke. This sound evokes a lively typing experience that many users find invigorating, especially in lively environments. In contrast, the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch offers a thocky sound, described as deep and rich, reminiscent of a soft "knock" or a muted "thud." This sound experience provides a more subdued auditory feedback that is often preferred for focused tasks or quieter settings, creating a stark contrast to the clack of the EVA. It's important to note that sound can also be influenced by other factors, such as the choice of keyboard body and keycap materials, meaning user experience can vary.
When it comes to feel, the HMX EVA switch delivers a remarkably light and smooth typing experience, often highlighted by its feathery touch. With minimal resistance and a silky action, these switches allow for effortless key presses, making them ideal for long typing sessions or gaming marathons where finger fatigue is a concern. Additionally, the bouncy nature of the switch provides a lively feedback, enhancing the user’s interaction with each keystroke. Conversely, the KTT Phalaenopsis features a stepped tactile feedback profile, marked by its discernible tactile bump at 50g of force. This makes for a satisfying typing experience, as the user can distinctly feel the switch engage in two stages, providing a more controlled input feel that some may find more pleasant during extended use.
In conclusion, while the HMX EVA linear switch excels in its clacky sound and exceptionally smooth, bouncy feel, the KTT Phalaenopsis switch stands out for its thocky sound and distinct tactile feedback. Ultimately, the choice between these two switches hinges on personal preference for auditory and tactile experiences during typing. If you’re seeking a lighter, more vibrant feel with a sharp sound, the EVA is a solid choice, while the Phalaenopsis provides a satisfying tactile sensation with a deeper auditory profile. Each switch excels in its unique qualities, allowing users to tailor their keyboard experience to their specific needs and preferences.
Conclusion
To conclude, the choice between the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Phalaenopsis tactile switch ultimately depends on your personal preferences and typing needs. If you prioritize a smooth, lightweight typing experience that minimizes finger fatigue, especially during prolonged use, the EVA switch is an excellent option. Its feathery actuation combined with a clacky sound signature makes it ideal for those who enjoy fast-paced gaming or need a switch for intensive typing sessions where speed and comfort are key. On the other hand, if you appreciate tactile feedback and enjoy the satisfying sensation of a tactile bump with every keystroke, the Phalaenopsis switch would be your best bet. Its slightly higher force requirement ensures a deliberate typing experience that many find rewarding, while its thocky sound provides an auditory pleasure that adds to the overall enjoyment of typing. Therefore, consider the nature of your tasks: opt for the HMX EVA for effortless, low-effort keystrokes or the KTT Phalaenopsis for a more engaging and responsive typing experience.
Mentioned in this article
