HMX EVA vs. KTT Pine
An in-depth look at the HMX EVA and the KTT Pine switches—which one is the best fit for you?
Overview
When it comes to enhancing your typing experience, the choice of mechanical keyboard switches can make a significant difference. Two noteworthy options are the HMX EVA and the KTT Pine, both linear switches designed for smooth key presses but offering unique attributes that cater to different preferences. The HMX EVA, inspired by the striking colors of Evangelion Unit-01, captivates users with its resonant sound signature and luxurious silky smooth feel, making it an excellent choice for those who seek a blend of aesthetic appeal and performance. In contrast, the KTT Pine brings a more nature-inspired flair, featuring a translucent, forest green design that not only looks fresh but delivers a medium-heavy actuation force combined with a buttery smooth keypress. Its polished, factory-lubed finish further enhances the typing experience by minimizing friction, ideal for users looking for effortless key travel. While both switches promise outstanding performance and comfort, the decision ultimately depends on individual preferences regarding aesthetics and tactile feedback. However, let's dive in a bit deeper beyond generalities so you can best decide on the best switch for you.
By the numbers
Technical specifications
Actuation force
42g
Actuation force
45g
Bottom-out force
48g
Bottom-out force
58g
Pre-travel
2.00 mm
Pre-travel
1.90 mm
Total travel
3.60 mm
Total travel
4.00 mm
Factory lubed
Yes
Factory lubed
Yes
Stem construction
Standard
Stem construction
Standard
Stem material
T2
Stem material
POM
Top housing material
Nylon
Top housing material
Polycarbonate
Bottom housing material
Nylon
Bottom housing material
Polycarbonate
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Mount type
PCB (5-pin)
Spring
22mm single-stage spring
Spring
15.5mm gold-plated spring
Housing materials
The HMX EVA and KTT Pine differ significantly in their housing materials, which directly influence the sound profiles and tactile feedback of each switch. The EVA utilizes nylon for both the top and bottom housings, a material known for its softer characteristics. This results in a deeper and fuller sound profile due to nylon's ability to absorb sound, creating a more muted acoustic experience. The classic nature of nylon also implies a more traditional typing feel, conducive to a more padded auditory response when keys are pressed and released. In contrast, the KTT Pine employs polycarbonate for both its top and bottom housings, a material that is stiffer and produces a sharper, crisper sound profile. The clarity and resonance afforded by polycarbonate give an entirely different typing experience, especially suitable for those who prefer a more pronounced auditory feedback during use.
When considering the aesthetic qualities of the housing materials, the differences become even more pronounced. The nylon used in the EVA has a more subdued appearance, which aligns well with users who favor a classic or muted design ethos. On the other hand, the KTT Pine's polycarbonate top housing has a translucent quality that not only enhances its appeal but also maximizes the effects of RGB lighting. This makes the Pine particularly eye-catching in setups where illumination is a key functional and decorative component. While both switches can provide effective performance, the choice between them would depend on user preference regarding sound profile, tactile feedback, and visual appeal.
Lastly, when analyzing the impact of different materials on overall performance, it becomes clear that the sound and feel characteristics differ meshed between the top and bottom housings in both switches. For the EVA, the nylon housing contributes to the overall sound signature, absorbing vibrations and creating a softer auditory experience during key presses and releases. Conversely, the Pine's use of polycarbonate ensures that both housings contribute to a sharper sound profile; the bottom housing's enhanced sound clarity impacts the tactile feedback significantly, while the top housing accentuates the acoustic sharpness. Ultimately, while both switches offer distinct sound profiles tied to their specific materials, understanding how each housing contributes to the overall switch experience can help users achieve their desired tactile and auditory outcomes, regardless of the specific materials used.
Weight
When comparing the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, notable differences emerge in terms of both actuation force and bottom out force. The EVA switch boasts a lighter actuation force of 42 grams and a bottom out force of 48 grams, catering to users who prefer a more effortless typing experience ideal for extended use and gaming. In contrast, the Pine switch has a slightly heavier actuation force of 45 grams and a bottom out force of 58 grams, appealing to those who enjoy a more substantial push feel while typing. This means that typists who prioritize lighter switches for marathon sessions should opt for the EVA, while those who prefer the heft and feedback of a heavier switch would likely favor the Pine. Ultimately, these differences in actuation and bottom out forces can distinctly influence the typing experience, aligning with individual user preferences for lighter or heavier switches.
Travel distance
When comparing the travel distance of the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch, it is clear that they differ in their specifications. The EVA switch features a travel distance of 3.6 mm, while the Pine switch has a slightly longer travel distance of 4 mm. This difference suggests that users who prefer a more responsive typing experience might lean toward the EVA due to its shorter travel distance, which is often favored by gamers for quicker response times. On the other hand, those who appreciate a more substantial feel might favor the KTT Pine, as its longer travel distance offers a more pronounced depth with each keystroke. Thus, while both switches provide distinct experiences, the EVA's 3.6 mm travel distance is shorter compared to the Pine's 4 mm, resulting in potentially quicker actuation for the former and a more substantial tactile experience for the latter.
Price comparison
Which switch is more bang for your buck?
The HMX EVA has an MSRP of $3.50 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the EVA for $2.99.
The KTT Pine has an MSRP of $4.60 per 10 switches. At Milktooth, we are able to pass on savings to our customers and offer the Pine for $4.15.
Here at Milktooth, we offer the best prices on switches (on average, 27% lower the competition). In addition, we offer free shipping on orders over $49.00. We also offer free returns and exchanges, so you can shop with guaranteed satisfaction.
That said, while price is an important piece of the puzzle, our opinion is that you should ultimately pick the option that most suits your unique preferences since you’ll be using these switches for years to come. In other words, finding something perfect for you is, in our view, the most important criteria.
Typing experience
When comparing the sound profiles of the HMX EVA and KTT Pine linear switches, it’s clear that the two options offer distinct auditory experiences. The EVA's sound signature is resonant, contributing to an engaging and satisfying auditory feedback during typing. This can make for a rich experience, although specifics on its exact tonal quality are not provided. In contrast, the KTT Pine switches deliver a deeper, bassy sound, characterized by low-pitched tones that enhance the overall typing experience with a rich, full-bodied sound. This bass-heavy quality can be especially appealing for those who appreciate a more profound auditory experience. However, it’s important to remember that the final sound can vary significantly depending on the chosen keyboard and keycap materials.
In terms of feel, the HMX EVA switch is celebrated for its silky smooth typing experience, though specific descriptors for its tactile feedback are lacking. This suggests a straightforward yet enjoyable feel, likely promoting a consistently fluid typing experience. On the other hand, the KTT Pine switches are described as buttery and creamy, indicating a luxurious, smooth sensation that emphasizes effortless keystrokes. The factory-lubricated finish significantly reduces friction, contributing to seamless key travel that enhances comfort over long typing sessions. Both switches command a smoother typing experience, but the KTT Pine offers an additional level of smoothness through its deliberate design features.
In conclusion, while the HMX EVA and KTT Pine linear switches differ in their sound and tactile characteristics, they both share the common trait of aiming to provide a pleasant typing experience. The EVA's resonant sound and smooth feel offer an engaging typing experience, while the KTT Pine’s bassy sound and buttery touch deliver an exceptionally smooth and effortless performance. Ultimately, users seeking a customized typing experience can find satisfaction in either switch, as both are designed to meet the demands of enthusiastic typists, albeit with unique auditory and tactile profiles.
Conclusion
To sum up, your choice between the HMX EVA linear switch and the KTT Pine linear switch ultimately depends on your typing preferences and intended use. If you gravitate towards a lighter switch that provides a unique aesthetic and sound profile, the EVA might be your ideal choice. Its 48-gram bottom-out force makes it easier to actuate, which is perfect for rapid typing and gaming scenarios where speed is crucial. Moreover, if you appreciate a resonant sound signature paired with a smooth keystroke, the EVA's design will likely enhance your overall experience. Conversely, if you prefer a more substantial typing feel with a medium-heavy actuation force of 58 grams, the KTT Pine is likely better suited for you. Its buttery smooth and creamy typing sensation provides an enjoyable experience for both typing and gaming, while its bassy, low-pitched sound may appeal to those who appreciate a richer audio profile during use. Ultimately, consider your personal typing style, the importance of sound and feel, and your aesthetic preferences when making your choice between these two compelling switches.